Compile with swc on twenty-server (#4863)

Experiment using swc instead of tsc (as we did the switch on
twenty-front)

It's **much** faster (at least 5x) but has stricter requirements.
I fixed the build but there's still an error while starting the server,
opening this PR for discussion.

Checkout the branch and try `nx build:swc twenty-server`

Read: https://docs.nestjs.com/recipes/swc#common-pitfalls
This commit is contained in:
Félix Malfait
2024-04-14 09:09:51 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent f82b1ff9ef
commit 9aa24ed803
50 changed files with 600 additions and 152 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
import { Relation } from 'src/engine/workspace-manager/workspace-sync-metadata/interfaces/relation.interface';
import { FullNameMetadata } from 'src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/composite-types/full-name.composite-type';
import { LinkMetadata } from 'src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/composite-types/link.composite-type';
import { FieldMetadataType } from 'src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/field-metadata.entity';
@ -129,7 +131,7 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
joinColumn: 'companyId',
})
@IsNullable()
company: CompanyObjectMetadata;
company: Relation<CompanyObjectMetadata>;
@FieldMetadata({
standardId: personStandardFieldIds.pointOfContactForOpportunities,
@ -144,7 +146,7 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
inverseSideFieldKey: 'pointOfContact',
onDelete: RelationOnDeleteAction.SET_NULL,
})
pointOfContactForOpportunities: OpportunityObjectMetadata[];
pointOfContactForOpportunities: Relation<OpportunityObjectMetadata[]>;
@FieldMetadata({
standardId: personStandardFieldIds.activityTargets,
@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
inverseSideTarget: () => ActivityTargetObjectMetadata,
onDelete: RelationOnDeleteAction.CASCADE,
})
activityTargets: ActivityTargetObjectMetadata[];
activityTargets: Relation<ActivityTargetObjectMetadata[]>;
@FieldMetadata({
standardId: personStandardFieldIds.favorites,
@ -173,7 +175,7 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
onDelete: RelationOnDeleteAction.CASCADE,
})
@IsSystem()
favorites: FavoriteObjectMetadata[];
favorites: Relation<FavoriteObjectMetadata[]>;
@FieldMetadata({
standardId: personStandardFieldIds.attachments,
@ -187,7 +189,7 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
inverseSideTarget: () => AttachmentObjectMetadata,
onDelete: RelationOnDeleteAction.CASCADE,
})
attachments: AttachmentObjectMetadata[];
attachments: Relation<AttachmentObjectMetadata[]>;
@FieldMetadata({
standardId: personStandardFieldIds.messageParticipants,
@ -203,7 +205,7 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
onDelete: RelationOnDeleteAction.SET_NULL,
})
@IsSystem()
messageParticipants: MessageParticipantObjectMetadata[];
messageParticipants: Relation<MessageParticipantObjectMetadata[]>;
@FieldMetadata({
standardId: personStandardFieldIds.calendarEventParticipants,
@ -221,7 +223,7 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
featureFlag: 'IS_CALENDAR_ENABLED',
})
@IsSystem()
calendarEventParticipants: CalendarEventParticipantObjectMetadata[];
calendarEventParticipants: Relation<CalendarEventParticipantObjectMetadata[]>;
@FieldMetadata({
standardId: personStandardFieldIds.events,
@ -237,5 +239,5 @@ export class PersonObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
})
@IsNullable()
@IsSystem()
events: EventObjectMetadata[];
events: Relation<EventObjectMetadata[]>;
}