# Ability to navigate dropdown menus with keyboard
The aim of this PR is to improve accessibility by allowing the user to
navigate inside the dropdown menus with the keyboard.
This PR refactors the `SelectableList` and `SelectableListItem`
components to move the Enter event handling responsibility from
`SelectableList` to the individual `SelectableListItem` components.
Closes [512](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/512)
## Key Changes:
- All dropdowns are now navigable with arrow keys
## Technical Implementation:
- Each `SelectableListItem` now has direct access to its own `Enter` key
handler, improving component encapsulation
- Removed the central `Enter` key handler logic from `SelectableList`
- Added `SelectableList` and `SelectableListItem` to all `Dropdown`
components inside the app
- Updated all component implementations to adapt to the new pattern:
- Action menu components (`ActionDropdownItem`, `ActionListItem`)
- Command menu components
- Object filter, sort and options dropdowns
- Record picker components
- Select components
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
When inserting a new step between step 1 et step 2, then step 1 should
have the new step as next step id, add stop having step 2.
When deleting a step, we link the parent and next steps together. It may
change in the future
> [!WARNING]
> I refactored a bunch of components into utility functions to make it
possible to display the `WorkflowStepHeader` component for **triggers**
in the `CommandMenuWorkflowRunViewStep` component. Previously, we were
asserting that we were displaying the header in `Output` and `Input`
tabs only for **actions**. Handling triggers too required a bunch of
changes. We can think of making a bigger refactor of this part.
In this PR:
- Only display the Flow for Workflow Runs; removed the Code Editor tab
- Allows users to see the Output of trigger nodes
- Prevent impossible states by manually setting the selected tab when
selecting a node
## Demo
### Success, Running and Not Executed steps
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6bebd0f-5da2-4ccc-aef2-d9890eafa59a
### Failed step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e1f4e13a-2f5e-4792-a089-928e4d6b1ac0
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/709
- requires a refacto so several fields can be updated at once
- updating object name on record picker will now update placeholder
- add a min-height to label so fields do not get moved when the label is
deleted
This PR was originally about fixing advanced filter dropdown auto resize
to avoid breaking the app main container, but the regression is not
limited to advanced filter dropdown, so this PR fixes the regression for
every dropdown in the app.
This PR adds a max dropdown max width to allow resizing dropdowns
horizontally also, which can happen easily for the advanced filter
dropdown.
In this PR we also start removing `fieldMetadataItemUsedInDropdown` in
component `AdvancedFilterDropdownTextInput` because it has no impact
outside of this component which is used only once.
The autoresize behavior determines the right padding-bottom between
mobile and PC.
Mobile :
<img width="604" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-07 à 16 03 12"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fbdd8020-1bfc-4e01-8a05-3a9f114cdd40"
/>
PC :
<img width="757" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-07 à 16 03 30"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f80a5967-8f60-40bb-ae3c-fa9eb4c65707"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/725
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11409
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fix Uncaught Error: Workflow is not enabled. If you want to use it,
please enable it in the lab.
<img width="505" alt="erroractionmenu"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/66e60219-20fb-4b00-90e4-d6bd640be774"
/>
This error was due to using the hook `useWorkflowWithCurrentVersion`
outside of a workflow object. Adding a skip parameter wasn't enough
because the `useFindOneRecord` uses `useObjectMetadataItem` which throws
if workflows aren't enabled.
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/690
This PR is the first part of a refactoring on the actions system
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/683. It:
- Removes `shouldBeRegistered` from the useAction hook
- Instead `shouldBeRegistered` becomes a function to which we can pass
parameters which describe the context of the app (the object, the
selected record, information about favorites ...). It returns a boolean.
- `useShouldActionBeRegisteredParams` returns the parameters to pass to
the `shouldBeRegistered`
- Introduces a way to inherit actions from the default config and to
overwrite its properties, closing
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/72
Some tests testing if an action was registered correctly have been
removed, we should add them back at the end of the global refactoring.
Fixes#11310
Note:
- I changed "system to advanced" because I think we will link that to
the Advanced Mode in the future
- Not sure when to use useCallback / useMemo, AI added some useCallbacks
which I removed but I left some useMemo... Not sure what should be the
rule
- It had to use MenuItem because this sub-menu behavior wasn't available
in the Standard select component. We should probably rename the
"MenuItem" elements to something more generic. I didn't do it in this PR
because I'm not sure about the strategy and it would change a lot of
files.
Mostly renaming objects to avoid conflicts (it was painful because names
were too generic so you could cmd+replace easily)
Also refactoring `useBuildAvailableFieldsForImport`
# Description
I previously introduced the `RecordTitleCell` component, but it was
coupled with the field context, so it was only usable for record fields.
This PR:
- Introduces a new component `TitleInput` for side panel pages which
needed to have an editable title which wasn't a record field.
- Fixes the hotkey scope problem with the workflow step page title
- Introduces a new hook `useUpdateCommandMenuPageInfo`, to update the
side panel page title and icon.
- Fixes workflow side panel UI
- Adds jest tests and stories
# Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c501245c-4492-4351-b761-05b5abc4bd14
Currently, when filling the form, values are not saved in the action
settings. This is an issue because we do not see the response in the
node settings, only in the output of the step.
This PR:
- adds a new endpoint to update a step in the run flow output
- updates this flow when a step is updated
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2e74a010-a0d2-4b87-bd1f-1c91f7ca6b60
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Wrap the content of Workflow View, Workflow Edit, and Workflow Run
side panels with a container making them take all the available height
- Remove the `StyledContainer` of code steps as it's redundant with the
global container
- Add the WorkflowStepHeader to the input and output tabs
- Make the JSON visualizer take all the available height in input and
output tabs
- Reuse the WorkflowStepBody component in the input and output tabs as
it applies proper background color
## Demo
Fixes
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1351906809417568376
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
- create a form filler component
- send the response on submit
- put back a field name. We need it for the step output
- validate a form is well set before activation
TODO:
- we need to refresh to see the form submitted. We need to discuss about
a strategy
- the response is not saved in the step settings. We need a new endpoint
to update workflow run step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f34a6cd-ed8c-4d9a-a1d4-51455cc83443
Workflows step details in workflows and versions should be different
from the node tab in run. For most cases, it was using the same
component. But for forms, it will be a different one.
This PR:
- renames form action into formBuilder. formFiller is coming
- put code into a separated folder
- creates a new component for node details
- Move the JsonTree component and the other components to twenty-ui
- Rely on a React Context to provide translations
## Future work
It would be good to migrate the `createRequiredContext` function to
`twenty-ui`. I didn't want to migrate it in this PR but would have liked
to use it.
