This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-6260](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-6260).
This ticket was imported from:
[TWNTY-6260](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6260)
---
### Description
This is the second PR on TWNTY-6260 which handles data migration of
Phone field to Phones field.\
\
How to Test?\
Follow the below steps:
- On the main branch,
- go to
`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm-seeds/workspace/people.ts`
and change any person's phone number to a string with characters for
example: "test invalid phone", and then reset the DB.
- reset database using `npx nx database:reset twenty-server`
- This is to make sure that invalid numbers will be handled properly. We
should use the invalid value itself to avoid removing data and see how
the behavior is on the front end. should be the same as in the main, the
display shows the invalid value, but the input is empty when you click,
and then you can update.
- Checkout to `TWNTY-6260-phone-migration` branch
- Rebuild typescript using `npx nx build twenty-server`
- Run command `yarn command:prod upgrade-0.32` to do migration
- Run both backend and frontend to see the migrated field
### Demo
- **Loom Video:**\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4b9bcb423cee447d8ad09852a83b27da?sid=ed74ecaa-0339-4575-acdc-a863e95e94fd>
### Refs
#6260
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
From PR: #6626Resolves#6763Resolves#6055Resolves#6782
## GTK
I retain the 'Invite by link' feature to prevent any breaking changes.
We could make the invitation by link optional through an admin setting,
allowing users to rely solely on personal invitations.
## Todo
- [x] Add an expiration date to an invitation
- [x] Allow to renew an invitation to postpone the expiration date
- [x] Refresh the UI
- [x] Add the new personal token in the link sent to new user
- [x] Display an error if a user tries to use an expired invitation
- [x] Display an error if a user uses another mail than the one in the
invitation
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR resolves the issue raised under #6797. Earlier no view/edit
option were present for inActive objects in data-model inside settings.
To resolve that following changes were done:
1. `SettingsObjectFieldItemTableRow` was not passing the onEdit with url
to `SettingsObjectFieldActiveActionDropdown` to redirect on clicking it.
So passed onEdit there.
2. `SettingsObjectFieldActiveActionDropdown` was not implementing the
onEdit functionality, so implemented that by creating `handleEdit()`
function.
3. `SettingsObjectFieldEdit` was assuming only `activeObjectMetadata
`will be coming to render on page. So, when inactive object was accessed
the path not found error message was thrown. Thus did changes to manage
both active and inactive objects by generalizing the
`activeObjectMetadata ` -> `objectMetadata`
`activeMetadataField `-> `metadataField`.
4. `findObjectMetadataItemBySlug `function was written inside
`useFilteredObjectMetadataItems` for fetching active/inactive object.
5. Updated `SettingsObjectFieldEdit` button to show and change the
active to inactive state and vice versa.
6. Test was written for `findObjectMetadataItemBySlug`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
This is the second PR on TWNTY-6261 which handlesdata migration of Email
field to Emails field.\
\
How to Test?\
Firstly make sure that you have completed the testing steps on first PR
then follow the below steps:
- Checkout to TWNTY-6261-emails-migrations branch
- Rebuild typescript using "npx nx build twenty-server"
- Run command "yarn command:prod upgrade-0.25" to do migration\
\
Loom Video:\
<https://www.loom.com/share/f82b8d29f8f64f92abe3c59c01147b45?sid=9f8ccc05-aa38-4c49-b139-fd0823066273>
**Testing Messaging Sync functionality:**
Please watch the below video to see that the synchronization of contacts
is working fine after migrating Email field to Emails field:\
<https://www.loom.com/share/400949464b244272b78c25e338cc6ab2?sid=103f6625-5933-4b99-9825-0fed33782f36>
**Question to the client**
should we rename email to emails here? in the DomainName PR, the name
did not change.
```typescript
@WorkspaceField({
standardId: PERSON_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.email,
type: FieldMetadataType.EMAILS,
label: 'Email',
description: 'Contact’s Email',
icon: 'IconMail',
})
email: EmailsMetadata;
```
**Test Messaging Sync**
This pr will update messaging sync files so the changes shouldn't break
existing functionality of importing people and companies in the app.\
To test messaging sync you should follow the below steps:\
1. you need to connect a google account to see the importing
functionality. For this purpose you
have to create a project inside Google Cloud. But to make things easier
you can use the below credentials of an already created project. Put
them in .env of twenty-server package:
```properties
MESSAGING_PROVIDER_GMAIL_ENABLED=true
CALENDAR_PROVIDER_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID=951231465939-h61tg6nkpkv1821qi899fjbj9looquto.apps.googleusercontent.com
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET=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
AUTH_GOOGLE_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google/redirect
AUTH_GOOGLE_APIS_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google-apis/get-access-token
MESSAGE_QUEUE_TYPE=bull-mq
```
Alternative env
```properties
MESSAGING_PROVIDER_GMAIL_ENABLED=true
CALENDAR_PROVIDER_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID=622006708006-dc4n3vrtf3cs2h6k7hgbborudme7ku9l.apps.googleusercontent.com
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET=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
AUTH_GOOGLE_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google/redirect
AUTH_GOOGLE_APIS_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google-apis/get-access-token
MESSAGE_QUEUE_TYPE=bull-mq
```
1. Launch your worker with `npx nx run twenty-server:worker`
2. npx nx run twenty-server:command cron:messaging:messages-import
3. npx nx run twenty-server:command cron:messaging:message-list-fetch
4. npx nx run twenty-server:command
cron📆calendar-event-list-fetch
5. Run the app and navigate to Settings/Accounts then connect your
Google account
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
### Description
- This is the first PR on Phones field;
- We are introducing new field type(Phones)
- We are Forbidding creation of Phone field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Phones field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
**How to Test**
1. Checkout to TWNTY-6260 branch
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command
3. Add custom field of type Phones in settings/data-model
**Loom Video:**\
<https://www.loom.com/share/3c981260be254dcf851256d020a20ab0?sid=58507361-3a3b-452c-9de8-b5b1abda70ac>
### Refs
#6260
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
- make member nullable on favorites
- add potential relation with view entity
- add a new type of favorite list in front : workspace favorite
- build a new component for retrieving workspace favorite to display +
refacto the existing one
Bonus:
- removing activities seed since this is deprecated
In this PR:
- revert de-optimization of icons bundle for storybook. This was forcing
the browser to load ~3k files while running stories
- adding lazy loading on Settings route to improve developer experience
(some files will be loaded later)
- fix FE tests: unit, modules stories, pages stories
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR adds the possibility of creating new steps. For now, only
actions are available. The steps are stored on the server, and the
visualizer is reloaded to include them.
Selecting a step opens the right drawer and shows its details. For now,
it's only the id of the step, but in the future, it will be the
parameters of the step.
In the future we'll want to let users add steps at any point in the
diagram. As a consequence, it's crucial to be able to walk in the tree
that make the steps to find the correct place where to put the new step.
I wrote a function that returns where the new step should be inserted.
This function will become recursive once we get branching implemented.
Things to mention:
- Reactflow needs every node and edge to have a unique identifier. In
this PR, I chose to use steps' id as nodes' id. That way, it's easy to
move from a node to a step, which helps make operations on a step
without resolving the step's id from the node's id.
### Description
1.
- We are introducing new field type(Emails)
- We are Forbiding creation of Email field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Emails field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
\
How To Test\
Follow the below steps for testing locally:\
1. Checkout to TWENTY-6261\
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command\
3. Run both the backend and frontend app\
4. Go to Settings/Data model and choose one of the standard objects like
people\
5. Click on Add Field button and choose Emails as the field type
\
### Refs
#6261\
\
### Demo
\
<https://www.loom.com/share/22979acac8134ed390fef93cc56fe07c?sid=adafba94-840d-4f01-872c-dc9ec256d987>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
## Features
- Fetch a workflow and display it in a tree with the React Flow library
- The nodes are positioned by an algorithm
- The feature is put behind a feature flag. The `/workflow/:id` route is
disabled if the flag is off.
- I started implementing a right drawer. That's a big WIP and it will be
finished in another PR.
## How to test this feature
1. Create a workflow instance in the database through a GraphQL query.
See below for instructions.
2. After enabling the feature flag, you should be able to see the
workflow you created in the workflows list. To visualize the workflow,
go to the `/workflow/:id` page where the id is the id of the workflow.
See the video for a quick way to do so.
```gql
// First
mutation createWorkflow($data: WorkflowCreateInput!) {
createWorkflow(data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "test"
}
}
// Second
mutation createWorkflowVersion($data: WorkflowVersionCreateInput!) {
createWorkflowVersion (data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "v1",
"trigger": {
"name": "trigger",
"displayName": "New or Updated Row",
"type": "DATABASE_EVENT",
"settings": {
"eventName": "company.created",
"triggerName": "Company Created"
},
"nextAction": {
"name": "step_1",
"displayName": "Code",
"type": "CODE",
"valid": true,
"settings": {
"serverlessFunctionId": "function_id",
"errorHandlingOptions": {
"retryOnFailure": {
"value": false
},
"continueOnFailure": {
"value": false
}
}
}
}
},
"workflowId": "workflow_id"
}
}
```
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42bbd98c-5e13-447c-9307-461a18ac2195
- Remove raw queries and replace them by using `twentyORM`
- Refactor into services and utils
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR introduces the following changes:
- Add the ability to filter webhooks by objectSingularName and Actions
- Refactor SettingsWebhookDetails edition to not use react-hook-form
(which will be deprecated on the whole project)
- Updating the tests with a complex set of mock (we just need to fix ~30
of them now :D)
<img width="1053" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e56d972-f129-4789-8d1c-4b5797a8ffd7">
In this PR:
- adding Favorites to Tasks and Notes
- fixing inconsistencies between custom object creation and sync of
standard fields of custom objects
- fixing workspaceCacheVersion not used to invalidate existing
datasource
This pull request introduces a new `FieldMetadataType` called `ACTOR`.
The primary objective of this new type is to add an extra column to the
following objects: `person`, `company`, `opportunity`, `note`, `task`,
and all custom objects.
This composite type contains three properties:
- `source`
```typescript
export enum FieldActorSource {
EMAIL = 'EMAIL',
CALENDAR = 'CALENDAR',
API = 'API',
IMPORT = 'IMPORT',
MANUAL = 'MANUAL',
}
```
- `workspaceMemberId`
- This property can be `undefined` in some cases and refers to the
member who created the record.
- `name`
- Serves as a fallback if the `workspaceMember` is deleted and is used
for other source types like `API`.
### Functionality
The pre-hook system has been updated to allow real-time argument
updates. When a record is created, a pre-hook can now compute and update
the arguments accordingly. This enhancement enables the `createdBy`
field to be populated with the correct values based on the
`authContext`.
The `authContext` now includes:
- An optional User entity
- An optional ApiKey entity
- The workspace entity
This provides access to the necessary data for the `createdBy` field.
In the GraphQL API, only the `source` can be specified in the
`createdBy` input. This allows the front-end to specify the source when
creating records from a CSV file.
### Front-End Handling
On the front-end, `orderBy` and `filter` are only applied to the name
property of the `ACTOR` composite type. Currently, we are unable to
apply these operations to the workspace member relation. This means that
if a workspace member changes their first name or last name, there may
be a mismatch because the name will differ from the new one. The name
displayed on the screen is based on the workspace member entity when
available.
### Missing Components
Currently, this PR does not include a `createdBy` value for the `MAIL`
and `CALENDAR` sources. These records are created in a job, and at
present, we only have access to the workspaceId within the job. To
address this, we should use a function similar to
`loadServiceWithContext`, which was recently removed from `TwentyORM`.
This function would allow us to pass the `authContext` to the jobs
without disrupting existing jobs.
Another PR will be created to handle these cases.
### Related Issues
Fixes issue #5155.
### Additional Notes
This PR doesn't include the migrations of the current records and views.
Everything works properly when the database is reset but this part is
still missing for now. We'll add that in another PR.
- There is a minor issue: front-end tests are broken since this commit:
[80c0fc7ff1).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5741
Filtering was already working.
I just added the required logic in the frontend to allow sorting by
primary link url (because label can be empty)
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#6431
- create new field `activationStatus`
- create migration commands
- add logic to update `activationStatus` on workspace activation and on
stripe subscriptionStatus change
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fcdd5ca-4329-467c-ada8-4dd5d45be259">
Open questions:
- the Tag component does not match Figma in term of style and API for
"transparent" | "outline". We need to discuss with @Bonapara what is the
desired behavior here
- right now opportunity.stage is not nullable. We need to discuss with
@FelixMalfait and @Bonapara what we want here. I would advocate to make
a it nullable for now until we introduce settings on select fields.
custom select are nullable and it could be confusing for the user
Follow up:
- enhance tests on Tags
- add story to cover the No Value column on record board
