This PR has several objectives:
- Ignore invalid and empty links in the frontend
- Ignore empty links when creating or updating a link field in the
backend
- Throw an error when trying to create or update a link field with an
invalid link
The logic is mostly the same in the frontend and the backend: we take
the initial primaryLink and the secondaryLinks, we discard all the empty
links (with `url === '' || url === null`), and the primaryLink becomes
the first remaining link.
## Frontend
There are three parts in the frontend where we have to remove the empty
links:
- LinksDisplay
- LinksFieldInput
- isFieldValueEmpty; used in RecordInlineCell
## Backend
I put the logic in
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/record-transformer/services/record-input-transformer.service.ts`
as it's used by the REST API, the GraphQL API, and by Create Record and
Update Record actions in the workflows.
# Introduction
Big diff a lot of tests and snapshots ( real diff < 500+ )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12117
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12133
## What has been done here
Implemented a strong integration coverage on both fieldmetadata`SELECT`
`UPDATE` and `CREATE`.
Implemented server side validation for the options `value` `label` `id`
and collision issue with also `position`
We could improve:
- Position validation
- DefaultValue validation
## Update
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/update-one-field-metadata-select.integration-spec.ts (41.054 s)
Field metadata select update tests group
✓ Update should succeed with provided option id (2565 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with valid default value (1469 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with various options id (1257 ms)
✓ Update should succeed without option id (1286 ms)
✓ Update should trim option values (1366 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with default value and no options (1122 ms)
✓ Update should fail with unknown default value and no options (1075 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces id (1195 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string id (1058 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null id (1066 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string id (1098 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long id (1373 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces label (1034 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string label (1057 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null label (1100 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string label (1144 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long label (1273 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces value (1385 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string value (1035 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null value (1068 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string value (1021 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long value (1134 ms)
✓ Update should fail with invalid option id (1137 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty options (1238 ms)
✓ Update should fail with invalid option value format (1104 ms)
✓ Update should fail with comma in option label (1004 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option values (1015 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option ids (1079 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option positions (1266 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated trimmed option values (1220 ms)
✓ Update should fail with undefined option label (1029 ms)
✓ Update should fail with an invalid default value (1142 ms)
✓ Update should fail with an unknown default value (1081 ms)
✓ Update should fail with undefined option value (1086 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 34 passed, 34 total
Snapshots: 28 passed, 28 total
Time: 41.079 s
```
## Create
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/create-one-field-metadata-select.integration-spec.ts (38.292 s)
Field metadata select creation tests group
✓ Create should succeed with provided option id (2096 ms)
✓ Create should succeed with valid default value (1316 ms)
✓ Create should succeed with various options id (1113 ms)
✓ Create should succeed without option id (1378 ms)
✓ Create should trim option values (1296 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces id (1000 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string id (1325 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null id (1060 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string id (1142 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long id (1321 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces label (999 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string label (1163 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null label (1198 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string label (1678 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long label (1527 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces value (1200 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string value (1102 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null value (1037 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string value (1462 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long value (896 ms)
✓ Create should fail with invalid option id (997 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty options (1058 ms)
✓ Create should fail with invalid option value format (1190 ms)
✓ Create should fail with comma in option label (1142 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option values (872 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option ids (860 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option positions (1002 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated trimmed option values (1336 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined option label (754 ms)
✓ Create should fail with an invalid default value (696 ms)
✓ Create should fail with an unknown default value (678 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined option value (699 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null options (720 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined options (686 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 34 passed, 34 total
Snapshots: 29 passed, 29 total
Time: 38.314 s
```
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed ! Please let me know
## Discussion about validation governance
### Front
Front side will be dealing with zod validations schema that he will
handle and maintain by himself
### Back validation instances
- Validation hold through DTO declarations ( run by yoga through the
resolvers )
- Server programmatic validation and exceptions handling ( run through
the services )
For this refactor/fix we decided to stick to the current implementation
only touching the `Server programmatic validation and exceptions
handling` we will handle validation centralization when we will onboard
the `nestjs-query` deprecation/integration refactor.
### Vision
In the best of the world we could think of an intermediary model that
will handle and take responsibility of the validation decorators that
would be run programmatically through the service, Yoga would still
consume it ? then we would need to have enough grain in the service to
know the input has already validated
## Notes
Introduced zod back side in order to handle very atomic and primitive
validation
Introducing a class of RelationException extending CustomException to
help grouping those exception in sentries by ExceptionCode.
I did not introduce a filter as these are thrown in utils that can be
used in multiple places now or in the future, and filters are to be
added at resolver-level.
We have approvedAccessDomain custom exceptions, but they were never
filtered while some of them reflects 4xx errors which we don't want to
be captured as 5xx errors
### Solution
> After discussion with charles & weiko, we chose the long term
solution.
>
> Fix FE to request checkUserExists resolver with lowercased emails
> Add a decorator on User (and AppToken for invitation), to lowercase
email at user (appToken) creation. ⚠️ It works for TypeOrm .save method
only (there is no user email update in codebase, but in future it
could..)
> Add email lowercasing logic in external auth controller
> Fix FE to request sendInvitations resolver with lowercased emails
> Add migration command to lowercase all existing user emails and
invitation emails
> For other BE resolvers, we let them permissive. For example, if you
made a request on CheckUserExists resolver with uppercased email, you
will not found any user. We will not transform input before checking for
existence.
[link to comment
](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12130#discussion_r2098062093)
### Test 🚧
- sign-in and up from main subdomain and workspace sub domain > Google
Auth (lowercased email) ✔️ | Microsoft Auth (uppercased email ✔️ &
lowercased email) | LoginPassword (uppercased email ✔️& lowercased
email✔️)
- invite flow with uppercased and lowercased ✔️
- migration command + sign-in ( former uppercased microsoft email ✔️) /
sign-up ( former uppercased invited email ✔️)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/278, closes
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/275, closes
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/279
### Context
Several 'Customer not found' errors arrived in Sentry, all coming from
webhook-entitlement.service, at subscription creation (coinciding with
customer creation 99% of the time).
Stripe sends many events to update/create customer, subscription,
entitlement, ...
All these events are handle in parallel but customer.created stripe
event arrived first and few seconds after subscription.created and
entitlements.active_entitlement_summary.updated
Issue happens at entitlements.active_entitlement_summary.updated
handling. It checks for customer existence through subscription. But
subscription can be not created yet at this moment.
### Solution
Check directly for customer existence in billingCustomer table. Not sure
it will fix the error because of the parallel handling of Stripe event,
but should still be better.
### Tested
- Workspace creation
- Subscription upgrade (check for entitlement update)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11960
- fix missing createBy injection in api createOne and createMany
endpoints
- add a command to fix null default value for createdBySource in
production entities
- tested on `1747159401197/` dump extract of production db without issue
Fix the following error:
Cannot use a pool after calling end on a pool
<img width="917" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-17 at 14 56 18"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63081831-9a7e-4633-8274-de9f8a48dbae"
/>
The problem was that the datasource manager was destroying the
connections when a datasource cache expired.
This PR implements a global PostgreSQL connection pool sharing
mechanism.
- Patches pg.Pool to reuse connection pools across the application when
connection parameters match, reducing resource overhead.
- New environment variables allow enabling/disabling sharing and
configuring pool size, idle timeout, and client exit behavior.
WorkspaceDatasourceFactory will now use shared pools if enabled, this
will avoid recreating 10 connections for each pods for each workspace.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Yoga graphql error were not correctly interpreted by the exception
handler. Mostly validations on the scalars such as bad enum options,
wrong format for uuid and such.
This PR adds a new convertGraphQLErrorToBaseGraphQLError utility
function in graphql-errors.util.ts that converts those errors to our
custom BaseGraphQLError by using the extension.http.code from the error
when possible so they can be handled the same way we treat the graphql
errors we throw ourselves.
Before
<img width="799" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 11 04 08"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/08b0a908-34d8-45a6-b315-8e211d1104ce"
/>
After
<img width="797" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-16 at 11 16 37"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3fff0a70-6c3f-413a-b458-56030377fec9"
/>
Follow-up on https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12007
In this PR
- adding a filter on HttpExceptionHandlerService to filter out 4xx
errors from driver handling (as we do for graphQL errors: see
useGraphQLErrorHandler hook - only filteredIssues are sent to`
exceptionHandlerService.captureExceptions()`.)
- grouping together more missing metadata issues
- attempting to use error codes as issues names in sentry to improve UI;
for now it says "Error" all the time
As discussed with @Weiko
Even though we cache the datasource, the connection expire after
10minutes in TypeORM, that might be the reason why our app is spamming
the proxy asking for connections. Also lowering the pool size.
Updated URL reference from getFrontUrl to getBaseUrl to ensure correct
hostname handling. Adjusted record filtering logic to exclude successful
records, preventing unnecessary rendering in the UI.
# Introduction
Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles
## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc
## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment
## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11864 and
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/908
We should not send `createManyXXX` mutations with FE-forged ids in the
payload if we want to do an upsert, because that 1) prevents records
from being merged 2) triggers optimistic rendering while we can't know
before-hand which records will actually be created and which records
will only be updated
Also noticed createdBy was being overriden even for records we are
updating and not creating, which did not seem right, so fixed that too
## Description
When a calendar channel fails, its status is not reset during the
reconnect step.
In some cases, resetting is necessary—especially when we’ve deployed a
fix and users try to reconnect their accounts after the patch.
## Why reseting to initial state
Our processes are idempotent, so we can safely set the status to null to
restart the flow. This approach covers all cases and avoids edge
conditions caused by inconsistent statuses.
Fixes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12026
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12040
When fields are deleted but still used in workflows we do not update
create record action settings.
It breaks all following workflow execution and the user cannot update
the settings anymore.
This PR fixes the bug by filtering on existing fields.
Next step will be to clean settings on field deletion. Adding it to fast
follows.
Also lowering throttle limit because some infinite loops are not
catched.
This PR attemps at improving sentry grouping and filtering by
- Using the exceptionCode as the fingerprint when the error is a
customException. For this to work in this PR we are now throwing
customExceptions instead of internalServerError deprived of their code.
They will still be converted to Internal server errors when sent back as
response
- Filtering 4xx issues where it was missing (for emailVerification
because errors were not handled, for invalid captcha and billing errors
because they are httpErrors and not graphqlErrors)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Several users have complained about not being able to read their emails
anymore.
This is because the find-messages post query hook is expecting
ObjectRecord[] as an input but is actually getting a graphql Connection
Typing was wrong. This PR fixes the typing and make sure the post query
hook always get an ObjectRecord[]
Using useEffect triggered at ActivityRichTextEditor unmount, to delete
attachments only when note is closed (and not when file block is deleted
during note update to keep command + z shortcut)
closes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11229
## What
This PR fixes a regression tied to the new relation format refactoring.
I'm also slightly improving the performance by decreasing the number of
queries.
## Considerations
1. I've started adding an integration test to cover relation creation
and deletion but we are still using the r`elation-metadata.service` to
create a relation and the `field-metadata.service` to delete it. As we
plan to fully deprecate the `relation-metadata.service`, I did not want
to invest into writing test tooling to change it in a few weeks so I've
reverted the test
2. We are still maintaining relationMetadata table up-to-date (so
deleting them when we delete the field). relationMetadata full
deprecation is up coming but I'm waiting a bit so we don't have breaking
changes in 0.53
This is a first PR to remove old relation logic
Next steps:
- remove relationMetadata from cache
- remove relationMetadata table content and structure
- refactor relationDefinition to leverage field.settings instead
- In this PR the default value of IS_CONFIG_VARIABLES_IN_DB_ENABLED has
been changed to true,
- This is my first time writing integration tests, so I’d appreciate a
thorough review. :)
I’ve tried to follow the existing test patterns closely, but there might
be some small mistakes I may have missed.
Also let me know if I have missed any important test cases that should
be tested
UPDATE -
### Config Value Converter Refactoring
- Created a centralized type transformers registry with bidirectional
validation
- Refactored ConfigValueConverterService to support validation in both
directions:
- Maintained existing DB-to-app conversion behavior
- Added validation for app-to-DB conversion
- Added integration tests to verify validation works in both directions
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Encountering a blocking issue due to legacy upgrade history in staging
due to relation refactor
For the moment ( release 0.53 ) swallowing
@charlesBochet
## How to test
```ts
checkout v0.52.11
yarn
database:reset
checkout 0.53
yarn
build server
migrate
upgrade
```
# Display "Soft-Deleted Workspace Members" in Actor Field Display
Reminder of the issue :
<img width="154" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 11 59"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/168f8743-2684-4d9a-b1a4-e86bb335f7a4"
/>
- `ActorFieldDisplay` component : display soft-deleted members
- `UserService` includes soft-deleted records when fetching workspace
members. This is the tricky part : do we want that for all workspace
members or maybe i could create another property dedicated to workspace
members and softdeleted ones. To be discussed
Result looks like this (we loose the source and the context in this
impleentation)
<img width="114" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 05 28"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cdddd91-454f-4e96-8d6d-6fe671658945"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11870
Another way we could also get into :
We could also, when a workspace user is softDeleted, change the current
implementation : we could avoid to delete the ActorMetadata like
CreatedByName (and context and source) in the "Person" table.
It would look more like this
<img width="111" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 06 16"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/daa4ece2-200a-41f0-ba24-177375c72983"
/>
However, this implementation is requires more work, and IMO harder to
maintain since is decouples completely the record from the workspace
member. This could be an issue in case we want tohard delete a user, or
decide another logic to display the Actor name.
Since the usecase should be pretty rare, I chose the first one but
willing to discuss it
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
## Context
While deploying the IS_NEW_RELATION_ENABLED (we don't compute relation
based on relationMetadata anymore) to existing workspace, I've tested to
run a sync-metadata post feature flag activation. This has raised two
issues:
- the workspaceMigration generator (which is over-complex and should be
refactored later) for fieldMetadata of type RELATION was not handling
settings update properly ;
- we need to delete existing fieldMetadata corresponding to the UUID
foreignKey as they are not needed anymore. This is handled as a 0.53
upgrade command as 0.53 will also come with the full removal of the old
relation system
---------
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
This PR adds what's needed to filter on the ADDRESS sub-fields, notably
the country sub-field, that requires a country multi select component,
which was created in this PR (ObjectFilterDropdownCountrySelect)
This PR refactors the common logic between advanced filter dropdown
field selection logic and view bar filter dropdown field selection
logic, notably in useFilterDropdownSelectableFieldMetadataItems.
There are now new components to identify clearly what's tied to view bar
or advanced filter, it could be further simplified or factorized, but as
it is right now, it's simple enough to be maintained easily even if a
little bit too verbose, which is often the best trade-off we should aim
for.
Improvements :
- Added the CompositeFieldSubFieldName where needed
- Fixes bug in advanced filter dropdown input
- Fixes dropdown content width bug in advanced filter dropdown input
- Fixes a bug when inputing a Currency filter without a sub-field in
view bar filter dropdown
- Used DropdownMenuSearchInput instead of a custom StyledInput which was
doing exactly the same thing
- Factorized the state setting logic in
useSetAdvancedFilterDropdownStates in an anonymous function
setAdvancedFilterDropdownStates
- Created useSelectFilterFromViewBarFilterDropdown hook to have a more
meaningful and clear logic to abstract what happens when we select a
field to filter in the view bard field select dropdown
- Fixes a bug with advanced filter operand dropdown select which wasn't
modifying the current record filter and creating a stale state.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/612
