## Introduction
This refactor results from this
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10493 review
Introduced a new abstraction to the extinsting
`generateDepthOneRecordGqlFields` that was accepting an optional record
in arg in order to map generated `recordGqlFields` to the keys in the
record
1/ Created a dedicated util method
`generateDepthOneRecordGqlFieldsFromRecord` to do so
2/ Updated each previous `generateDepthOneRecordGqlFields` passing a
record to call new `generateDepthOneRecordGqlFieldsFromRecord`
# Introduction
While importing records encountering missing expected fields when
writting a fragment from apollo cache
## Updates
### 1/ `createdBy` Default value
When inserting in cache in create single or many we will now make
optimistic behavior on the createdBy value
### 2/ `createRecordInCache` dynamically create `recordGrqlFields`
When creating an entry in cache, we will now dynamically generate fields
to be written in the fragment instead of expecting all of them. As by
nature record could be partial
### 3/ Strictly typed `RecordGqlFields`
# Conclusion
closes#9927
# Introduction
At the moment when updating any record cache occurence, we will build a
fragment that will expect all of the object metadata item fields to be
provided.
Which result in the following traces: ( in the video companies aren't
fetch with companyId and other missing fields )
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56eab7c1-8f01-45ff-8f5d-78737b788b92
By definition as we're using graphql we might not request every record's
fields each time we wanna consume them.
In this way we will now dynamically compute or expect depending on the
CRUD operation specific fields to be written in the cache, and not all
of them
Tested all optimistic and failure management use cases
## Covering cache
Added coverage only for the `deleteOne` and `deleteMany` hooks, it cover
only the record record cache and not its relations hydratation ( for the
moment )
## Why not closing #9927
Unless I'm mistaken everything done here have fixed the same logs/traces
issue for updates and deletion but not creation.
Which means we still need to investigate the mass upload from import and
prefillRecord behavior
In a nutshell: went over each `updateRecordFromCache` calls, still need
to do all `createRecordInCache` calls
related to #9927
## Conlusion
Sorry for the big PR should have ejected into a specific one for the
`MinimalRecord` refactor
Will also continue covering others hooks later in my week as for the
`deleteOne`
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
Implements filtering, ordering and cursor filtering for the hook
useCombinedFindManyRecords, because it was not implemented, which was
misleading because variables could be passed to it.
The difficult part was to make sure that the cursor filtering was
working, both before and after a cursor, because it was only hard coded
for last cursor (equivalent to after).
The duplicate limit parameter in the type RecordGqlOperationVariables
was merged into one limit parameter, because it was making the developer
guess how both could be handled.
This single limit parameter can be used for either : general limit
without cursor, first records from after cursor, last records until
before cursor. Since those cases are exclusive it's better to have only
one limit parameter and have an internal logic handling those cases.
Tests were added on the relevant parts, especially
useCombinedFindManyRecordsQueryVariables which requires its own unit
test to handle this cursor + limit logic.
Record show page pagination was tested to make sure removing the
duplicate limit parameter had no impact.
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
This PR targets twentyhq/core-team-issues#85.
@FelixMalfait As we discussed I have made those changes . Could you
please test it at your end?
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Steps to test
1. Run metadata migrations
2. Run sync-metadata on your workspace
3. Enable the following feature flags:
IS_SEARCH_ENABLED
IS_QUERY_RUNNER_TWENTY_ORM_ENABLED
IS_WORKSPACE_MIGRATED_FOR_SEARCH
4. Type Cmd + K and search anything
### Description
- This is the first PR on Phones field;
- We are introducing new field type(Phones)
- We are Forbidding creation of Phone field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Phones field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
**How to Test**
1. Checkout to TWNTY-6260 branch
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command
3. Add custom field of type Phones in settings/data-model
**Loom Video:**\
<https://www.loom.com/share/3c981260be254dcf851256d020a20ab0?sid=58507361-3a3b-452c-9de8-b5b1abda70ac>
### Refs
#6260
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
### Description
1.
- We are introducing new field type(Emails)
- We are Forbiding creation of Email field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Emails field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
\
How To Test\
Follow the below steps for testing locally:\
1. Checkout to TWENTY-6261\
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command\
3. Run both the backend and frontend app\
4. Go to Settings/Data model and choose one of the standard objects like
people\
5. Click on Add Field button and choose Emails as the field type
\
### Refs
#6261\
\
### Demo
\
<https://www.loom.com/share/22979acac8134ed390fef93cc56fe07c?sid=adafba94-840d-4f01-872c-dc9ec256d987>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request introduces a new `FieldMetadataType` called `ACTOR`.
The primary objective of this new type is to add an extra column to the
following objects: `person`, `company`, `opportunity`, `note`, `task`,
and all custom objects.
This composite type contains three properties:
- `source`
```typescript
export enum FieldActorSource {
EMAIL = 'EMAIL',
CALENDAR = 'CALENDAR',
API = 'API',
IMPORT = 'IMPORT',
MANUAL = 'MANUAL',
}
```
- `workspaceMemberId`
- This property can be `undefined` in some cases and refers to the
member who created the record.
- `name`
- Serves as a fallback if the `workspaceMember` is deleted and is used
for other source types like `API`.
### Functionality
The pre-hook system has been updated to allow real-time argument
updates. When a record is created, a pre-hook can now compute and update
the arguments accordingly. This enhancement enables the `createdBy`
field to be populated with the correct values based on the
`authContext`.
The `authContext` now includes:
- An optional User entity
- An optional ApiKey entity
- The workspace entity
This provides access to the necessary data for the `createdBy` field.
In the GraphQL API, only the `source` can be specified in the
`createdBy` input. This allows the front-end to specify the source when
creating records from a CSV file.
### Front-End Handling
On the front-end, `orderBy` and `filter` are only applied to the name
property of the `ACTOR` composite type. Currently, we are unable to
apply these operations to the workspace member relation. This means that
if a workspace member changes their first name or last name, there may
be a mismatch because the name will differ from the new one. The name
displayed on the screen is based on the workspace member entity when
available.
### Missing Components
Currently, this PR does not include a `createdBy` value for the `MAIL`
and `CALENDAR` sources. These records are created in a job, and at
present, we only have access to the workspaceId within the job. To
address this, we should use a function similar to
`loadServiceWithContext`, which was recently removed from `TwentyORM`.
This function would allow us to pass the `authContext` to the jobs
without disrupting existing jobs.
Another PR will be created to handle these cases.
### Related Issues
Fixes issue #5155.
### Additional Notes
This PR doesn't include the migrations of the current records and views.
Everything works properly when the database is reset but this part is
still missing for now. We'll add that in another PR.
- There is a minor issue: front-end tests are broken since this commit:
[80c0fc7ff1).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Closes#5924.
Adding the "many" side of relations in the table view, and fixing some
issues (glitch in Multi record select, cache update after update).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR introduces an `upsert` parameter (along the existing `data`
param) for `createOne` and `createMany` mutations.
When upsert is set to `true`, the function will look for records with
the same id if an id was passed. If not id was passed, it will leverage
the existing duplicate check mechanism to find a duplicate. If a record
is found, then the function will perform an update instead of a create.
Unfortunately I had to remove some nice tests that existing on the args
factory. Those tests where mostly testing the duplication rule
generation logic but through a GraphQL angle. Since I moved the
duplication rule logic to a dedicated service, if I kept the tests but
mocked the service we wouldn't really be testing anything useful. The
right path would be to create new tests for this service that compare
the JSON output and not the GraphQL output but I chose not to work on
this as it's equivalent to rewriting the tests from scratch and I have
other competing priorities.
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
* perf: apply record optimistic effects with cache.modify on mutation
Closes#3509
* refactor: return early when created records do not match filter
* fix: fix id generation on record creation
* fix: comment filtering behavior on record creation
* Fixed typing error
* refactor: review - use ??
* refactor: review - add variables in readFieldValueToSort
* docs: review - add comments for variables.first in triggerUpdateRecordOptimisticEffect
* refactor: review - add intermediary variable for 'not' filter in useMultiObjectSearchMatchesSearchFilterAndToSelectQuery
* refactor: review - add filter utils
* fix: fix tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* fix: fix Relation field optimistic effect on Record update
Related to #3099
* Fix lint
* Fix
* fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
* Use new ObjectRecordConnection
* Use new records without connection in GraphQLView
* Added playwright for storybook tests
* Fixed lint
* Fixed test and tsc
* Fixed storybook tests
* wip tests
* Added useMapConnectionToRecords unit test
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
* WIP
* Finished cleaning favorites create, update, delete on record show page
* Fixed context menu favorite
* Fixed relation field bug
* Fix from review
* Review
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
