# Introduction
Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles
## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc
## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment
## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
We have recently discovered that we were using ID type in place of UUID
type in many place in the code.
We have merged #4895 but this introduced bugs as we forgot to replace it
everywhere
**Context**
cf. feature request
[#4597](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/4597)
Enables deletion of custom fields that aren't active nor of type
relation
Also
1. renamed a misnamed file
2. deleted redundant hook BeforeDeleteOneField as it seemed best to move
the logic to the resolver instead
**How was it tested?**
Did not write unit tests as code is to be migrated (discussed with
@Weiko).
Locally tested.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <mariestoppa@MacBook-Pro-de-Marie.local>
