This PR fixes many small bugs around the recent hotkey scope refactor.
- Removed unused ActionBar files
- Created components CommandMenuOpenContainer and
KeyboardShortcutMenuOpenContent to avoid mounting listeners when not
needed
- Added DEFAULT_CELL_SCOPE where missing in some field inputs
- Called setHotkeyScopeAndMemorizePreviousScope instead of
setHotkeyScope in new useOpenFieldInputEditMode hook
- Broke down RecordTableBodyUnselectEffect into multiple simpler effect
components that are mounted only when needed to avoid listening for
keyboard and clickoutside event
- Re-implemented recently deleted table cell soft focus component logic
into RecordTableCellDisplayMode
- Created component selector isAtLeastOneTableRowSelectedSelector
- Drill down hotkey scope when opening a dropdown
- Improved debug logs
# Description
Closes [#696](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/696)
- `useAction` hooks have been removed for all actions
- Every action can now declare a react component
- Some standard action components have been introduced: `Action`,
`ActionLink` and `ActionModal`
- The `ActionDisplay` component uses the new `displayType` prop of the
`ActionMenuContext` to render the right component for the action
according to its container: `ActionButton`, `ActionDropdownItem` or
`ActionListItem`
- The `ActionDisplayer` wraps the action component inside a context
which gives it all the information about the action
-`actionMenuEntriesComponenState` has been removed and now all actions
are computed directly using `useRegisteredAction`
- This computation is done inside `ActionMenuContextProvider` and the
actions are passed inside a context
- `actionMenuType` gives information about the container of the action,
so the action can know wether or not to close this container upon
execution
This PR was originally about fixing advanced filter dropdown auto resize
to avoid breaking the app main container, but the regression is not
limited to advanced filter dropdown, so this PR fixes the regression for
every dropdown in the app.
This PR adds a max dropdown max width to allow resizing dropdowns
horizontally also, which can happen easily for the advanced filter
dropdown.
In this PR we also start removing `fieldMetadataItemUsedInDropdown` in
component `AdvancedFilterDropdownTextInput` because it has no impact
outside of this component which is used only once.
The autoresize behavior determines the right padding-bottom between
mobile and PC.
Mobile :
<img width="604" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-07 à 16 03 12"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fbdd8020-1bfc-4e01-8a05-3a9f114cdd40"
/>
PC :
<img width="757" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-07 à 16 03 30"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f80a5967-8f60-40bb-ae3c-fa9eb4c65707"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/725
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11409
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fix Uncaught Error: Workflow is not enabled. If you want to use it,
please enable it in the lab.
<img width="505" alt="erroractionmenu"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/66e60219-20fb-4b00-90e4-d6bd640be774"
/>
This error was due to using the hook `useWorkflowWithCurrentVersion`
outside of a workflow object. Adding a skip parameter wasn't enough
because the `useFindOneRecord` uses `useObjectMetadataItem` which throws
if workflows aren't enabled.
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
Introduce two hooks:
- `useRegisteredRecordActions`
- `useRegisteredRecordAgnosticActions`
These hooks will be used to read directly the registered actions
according to the context.
We will stop to rely on `actionMenuEntriesComponentState` to improve
performances and reduce state copies and updates.
This PR is part of
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/683, and at this
step, we still save the actions inside
`actionMenuEntriesComponentState`.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/690
This PR is the first part of a refactoring on the actions system
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/683. It:
- Removes `shouldBeRegistered` from the useAction hook
- Instead `shouldBeRegistered` becomes a function to which we can pass
parameters which describe the context of the app (the object, the
selected record, information about favorites ...). It returns a boolean.
- `useShouldActionBeRegisteredParams` returns the parameters to pass to
the `shouldBeRegistered`
- Introduces a way to inherit actions from the default config and to
overwrite its properties, closing
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/72
Some tests testing if an action was registered correctly have been
removed, we should add them back at the end of the global refactoring.
On default objects:
- Add see workflows
On workflows:
- Add see all runs (no selection)
On workflow runs:
- Add see workflows (no selection)
- Add see linked workflow (single record selection)
- Add see run version (single record selection)
On workflows versions
- Add see all runs (no selection)
- Add see workflows (no selection)
- Add see linked workflow (single record selection)
- Add see linked runs (single record selection)
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
Fixing:
- Export as PDF on empty note
- Command O (sub commands) not using the right contextStore
- BelongsToOne Field input triggering an error on open if no existing
relation record is pre-selected
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/271
This PR
- Removes the feature flag IS_COMMAND_MENU_V2_ENABLED
- Removes all old Right drawer components
- Removes the Action menu bar
- Removes unused Copilot page
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/491
This PR:
- Duplicates the right drawer pages for the command menu and replace all
the states used in these pages by component states (The right drawer
pages will be deleted when we deprecate the command menu v1)
- Wraps those pages into a component instance provider
- We store the component instance id upon navigation to restore the
states when we navigate back to a page
The only pages which are not updated for now are the pages related to
the workflow objects, this will be done in another PR.
In another PR, to improve the navigation experience I will replace the
icons and titles of the chips by the label identifier and the avatar if
the page is a record page.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a76d3345-01f3-4db9-8a55-331cca8b87e0
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/63
This PR:
- Creates an **Import csv** action
- Allows the import of notes and tasks
- Removes the import action from the index option menu
- Adds export action when only one record is selected
- Adds see deleted record action to workflow objects
## Introduction
Added coverage on the `useDeleteOneRecord` hooks, especially its
optimistic behavior feature.
Introduced a new testing tool `InMemoryTestingCacheInstance` that has
builtin very basic expectors in order to avoid future duplication when
covering others record hooks `update, create, destroy` etc etc
## Notes
Added few comments in this PR regarding some builtin functions I've
created around companies and people mocked object model and that I think
could be cool to spread and centralize within a dedicated "class
template"
Also put in light that unless I'm mistaken some tests are running on
`RecordNode` and not `RecordObject`
Took few directions on my own that as I always I would suggestion nor
remarks on them !
Let me know
## Misc
- Should we refactor `useDeleteOneRecord` tests to follow `eachTesting`
pattern ? => I feel like this is inappropriate as this hooks is already
high level, the only plus value would be less tests code despite
readability IMO
This PR simply implements record filter group states and context, as we
did for record filter and record sort.
We use a separate context for record filter and record filter group,
we'll see later if it can be merged in practice, but better be cautious
for now.
In the action menu dropdown, we only want to display the actions for the
selected records, so we need to filter available actions according to
their type and scope.
Note: the `Search record` action was appearing twice because one is a
standard action and one is a fallback action and both are registered in
the available actions. We don't want to display this action because it
isn't related to the selected records, it is a global action.
Before:
<img width="226" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-02-21 à 12 12 53"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a4f9b8c-4e30-4697-9861-559e76dc288f"
/>
After:
<img width="241" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-02-21 à 12 10 34"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0a98c9d5-432d-4018-a4d3-bf3a6d0c49be"
/>
This PR is simple, it creates states for record sort, mirroring record
filter states.
It also implements RecordSortsComponentInstanceContext everywhere
RecordFiltersComponentInstanceContext is used.
This could be later merged into a common RecordContext concept but we
first need to decide how to handle the existing ContextStore and
RecordIndexContext and ideally end up with a unique context (or a
context provider component that wraps in all those contexts at once).
Some bugs are already present on main when trying to delete a sort, they
will be fixed in the next PRs.
In this huge (sorry!) PR:
- introducing objectMetadataItem in contextStore instead of
objectMetadataId which is more convenient
- splitting some big hooks into smaller parts to avoid re-renders
- removing Effects to avoid re-renders (especially onViewChange)
- making the view prefetch separate from favorites to avoid re-renders
- making the view prefetch load a state and add selectors on top of it
to avoir re-renders
As a result, the performance is WAY better (I suspect the favorite
implementation to trigger a lot of re-renders unfortunately).
However, we are still facing a random app freeze on view creation. I
could not investigate the root cause. As this seems to be already there
in the precedent release, we can move forward but this seems a urgent
follow up to me ==> EDIT: I've found the root cause after a few ours of
deep dive... an infinite loop in RecordTableNoRecordGroupBodyEffect...
prastoin edit: close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10253
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
The command menu search bar was reset after clicking on the `Search
records` fallback action, but it shouldn't.
This PR:
- Introduces a new type of action: `Fallback` actions
- Reset the search bar only if the action key differs from
'record-search-fallback'
# Introduction
At the moment when updating any record cache occurence, we will build a
fragment that will expect all of the object metadata item fields to be
provided.
Which result in the following traces: ( in the video companies aren't
fetch with companyId and other missing fields )
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56eab7c1-8f01-45ff-8f5d-78737b788b92
By definition as we're using graphql we might not request every record's
fields each time we wanna consume them.
In this way we will now dynamically compute or expect depending on the
CRUD operation specific fields to be written in the cache, and not all
of them
Tested all optimistic and failure management use cases
## Covering cache
Added coverage only for the `deleteOne` and `deleteMany` hooks, it cover
only the record record cache and not its relations hydratation ( for the
moment )
## Why not closing #9927
Unless I'm mistaken everything done here have fixed the same logs/traces
issue for updates and deletion but not creation.
Which means we still need to investigate the mass upload from import and
prefillRecord behavior
In a nutshell: went over each `updateRecordFromCache` calls, still need
to do all `createRecordInCache` calls
related to #9927
## Conlusion
Sorry for the big PR should have ejected into a specific one for the
`MinimalRecord` refactor
Will also continue covering others hooks later in my week as for the
`deleteOne`
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
Close
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1334441759484149793
Using refetch queries was not working for certain use cases.
To find manual active workflows in cmd+k, we use a query with specific
filters that was complicated to refetch.
Finally I will update the cache manually. It was not properly updated
before because the json value of the version trigger was stringified
without spaces. So the entity was not found in apollo cache.
