- composite field need to be formatted before being saved
- repository.create() does not do it. So we simply lose the composite
fields on the way
- save() does it directly and doing create() before does not change
anything
Having a global record crud action adds complex logic.
We decided to split those actions. I only kept a common folder / module
in backend.
⚠️ this may break existing workflows if these were using previous
actions!
Output schema is now separated in two sections:
- object, that gather all informations on the selectable object
- fields, that display object fields in a record context, or simply the
available fields from the previous steps
The dropdown variable has now a new mode:
- if objectNameSingularToSelect is defined, it goes into an object mode.
Only objects of the right type will be shown
- if not set, it will use the already existing mode, to select a field
When an object is selected, it actually set the id of the object
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c95f8fd-10f0-4c1c-aeb7-c7d847e89536
This PR is fixing the following issues with record groups:
- [x] [Backend] - Only update view groups when a field is edited if this
one already has view groups
- [x] [Backend] - Editing a Select field metadata option brake view
groups
- [x] [Frontend] - Changing the group by field from one to another brake
record group and doesn't remove the previous ones
- [x] [Frontend & Backend] - Mark `kanbanFieldMetadataId` as deprecated
in favour of `viewGroups.fieldMetadataId`
Also the following has been checked:
- [x] Properly displayed a table with only one view groups
- [x] Properly displayed a table without view groups
- [ ] Catch this specific `500` error
- [ ] Make sure catched `500` errors are sent to sentry for the Cloud
version
- [ ] Hide the option to sync email with google in this situation where
the according env var is missing
- [x] Add Worskpace information to all catched errors for better
debugging
fix#8607
- create a serverless function when creating a new workflow code step
- add code editor in workflow code step
- move workflowVersion steps management from frontend to backend
- add a custom resolver for workflow-version management
- fix optimistic rendering on frontend
- fix css
- delete serverless function when deleting workflow code step
TODO
- Don't update serverlessFunction if no code change
- Factorize what can be between crud trigger and crud step
- Publish serverless version when activating workflow
- delete serverless functions when deleting workflow or workflowVersion
- fix optimistic rendering for code updates
- Unify CRUD types
<img width="1279" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d97ee9f-4b96-4abc-9d36-5c0280058be4">
- Refactor VariableTagInput to have a reusable low-level TipTap editor
- Create three primitive form fields:
- Text
- Number
- Boolean
## Notes
- We should automatically recognize the placeholder to use for every
FormFieldInput, as it's done for FieldInputs.
## Design decisions
Our main challenge was for variables and inputs to be able to
communicate between each other. We chose an API that adds some
duplication but remains simple and doesn't rely on "hacks" to work.
Common styles are centralized.
## Demo
"Workflow" mode with variables:
FormFieldInput mode, without variables:
Behavior difference between fields that can contain variables and static
content, and inputs that can have either a variable value or a static
value:
## Context
We recently added a command to ensure uniqueness on the viewId column in
the viewField table. This created some issues for some old workspaces
that had viewFields with an empty viewId.
This command should get rid of those and set the column as non-nullable.
Also updating the onDelete action accordingly and set one missing for
FavoriteFolder
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8300
## Context
API events were created too late and were already formatted as Gql
responses (including nesting with edges/node/type + formatting that
should not exist in an event payload). This PR moves the emit logic to
the resolver where we actually do the DB query
Note: Also added RESTORED events
## Context
- Fixing folder structure where 0.33 was inside 0.32.
- Updating the command so it runs enforce uniqueness on all tables
- Updating workspaces entities so the sync metadata adds the index
## Context
The object metadata map is becoming quite large and its structure could
be simplified.
We are removing byNameSingular/byNamePlural keys, the former can be
retrieved through a new helper and the latter is not used in the code
base currently.
Fixes bug introduced in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8193
Taking into account linked event name `linked-{eventName}` as before
issue
## Before
`linked-created` and `linked-updated` activity targets were not created
in `timelineActivity` table
## After
`linked-created` and `linked-updated` activity targets are created in
`timelineActivity` table
Steps to enable workflows:
- enable feature flags
- run metadata sync
- run this command
If the feature flag is not true, the command will fail. Which will be
useful to prevent seeding a wrong workspace.
Including a little fix for send email aciton error
Implemented:
* Account Connect
* Calendar sync via delta ids then requesting single events
I think I would split the messaging part into a second pr - that's a
step more complex then the calendar :)
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
- add `inputSchema` column in serverless function. This is an array of
parameters, with their name and type
- on serverless function id update, get the `inputSchema` + store empty
settings in step
- from step settings, build the form
TODO in next PR:
- use field type to decide what kind of form should be printed
- have a strategy to handle object as input
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ed96f919-24b5-4baf-a051-31f76f45e575
- Removing unique constraint creation in 0.32 as we have a dependency on
sync-metadata and sync-metadata has a dependency on it if we keep it.
- sync-metadata does not support well the deletion of activity +
activityTarget, silently swallow the exception for now
## Context
ObjectMetadataService became quite large and handles too many
responsibilities. I'm trying to refactor a bit this part in preparation
of a larger work that will combine object-metadata services and
sync-metadata logic
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_ICONS that can be reused in relation
creation to refer to a standard object icon.
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELD_IDS that can be used with an object
name to get its standard field ids.
- Moved migration, record and relation creations to dedicated services,
refactored to improve performances and readability
- Refactored some validation logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
- Add support for manual triggers in the backend
- Add a right drawer to let users select the type of trigger they want
- Create a specific right drawer for database event triggers
- Create a right drawer for manual triggers; let the user select where
the manual trigger should be made available
- Create a default trigger as soon as the user selects the type of
trigger they want. It prevents the user to see empty selects for record
type and event type. By default, the database event trigger will be set
to "company.created". It should be visible enough for users to
understand what happens and choose another record type or event type.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29a21985-1823-4890-9eb3-e4f876459c7a
Fix#4244 and #4356
This pull request introduces the new "view groups" capability, enabling
the reordering, hiding, and showing of columns in Kanban mode. The core
enhancement includes the addition of a new entity named `ViewGroup`,
which manages column behaviors and interactions.
#### Key Changes:
1. **ViewGroup Entity**:
The newly added `ViewGroup` entity is responsible for handling the
organization and state of columns.
This includes:
- The ability to reorder columns.
- The option to hide or show specific columns based on user preferences.
#### Conclusion:
This PR adds a significant new feature that enhances the flexibility of
Kanban views through the `ViewGroup` entity.
We'll later add the view group logic to table view too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
