Refers #8128
Changes Introduced:
- Added i18n configuration.
- Added a feature flag for localization.
- Enabled language switching based on the flag.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Before the `recordIndexId` was the name plural. This caused problems
because the component states were the same for every view of an object.
When we switched from one view to another, some states weren't reset.
This PR fixes this by:
- Creating an effect at the same level of page change effect to set the
`currentViewId` inside the object `contextStore`
- Adding the `currentViewId` to the `recordIndexId`
Follow ups:
- We need to get rid of
`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/views/states/currentViewIdComponentState.ts`
and use the context store instead
We were using metadata client by legacy. Architecture is not great for
Core engine: workflows are available both in data and metadata client.
It makes more sense to use the data client since workflows are part of
standard objects
In this PR:
- migrate WorkspaceActivationStatus to twenty-shared (and update case to
make FE and BE consistent)
- introduce isWorkspaceActiveOrSuspended in twenty-shared
- refactor the code to use it (when we fetch data on the FE, we want to
keep SUSPENDED workspace working + when we sync workspaces we want it
too)
### Context
- Update /plan-required page to let users get free trial without credit
card plan
- Update usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation to redirect paused and
canceled subscription (suspended workspace) to /settings/billing page
### To do
- [x] Update usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation test
- [x] Update ChooseYourPlan sb test
closes#9520
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
After hitting use as draft, we redirect the user to the workflow page.
If the user already accessed that page, the workflow and its current
version will be stored in cache. So we also need to update that cache.
I tried to update it manually but it was more complex than expected.
Steps and trigger are not fully defined objects.
I ended with a simple refetch query that I wanted to avoid but that is
at least fully working with minimum logic.
Closestwentyhq/twenty#8240
This PR introduces email verification for non-Microsoft/Google Emails:
## Email Verification SignInUp Flow:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/740e9714-5413-4fd8-b02e-ace728ea47ef
The email verification link is sent as part of the
`SignInUpStep.EmailVerification`. The email verification token
validation is handled on a separate page (`AppPath.VerifyEmail`). A
verification email resend can be triggered from both pages.
## Email Verification Flow Screenshots (In Order):
## Sent Email Details (Subject & Template):
### Successful Email Verification Redirect:
### Unsuccessful Email Verification (invalid token, invalid email, token
expired, user does not exist, etc.):
### Force Sign In When Email Not Verified:
# TODOs:
## Sign Up Process
- [x] Introduce server-level environment variable
IS_EMAIL_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED (defaults to false)
- [x] Ensure users joining an existing workspace through an invite are
not required to validate their email
- [x] Generate an email verification token
- [x] Store the token in appToken
- [x] Send email containing the verification link
- [x] Create new email template for email verification
- [x] Create a frontend page to handle verification requests
## Sign In Process
- [x] After verifying user credentials, check if user's email is
verified and prompt to to verify
- [x] Show an option to resend the verification email
## Database
- [x] Rename the `emailVerified` colum on `user` to to `isEmailVerified`
for consistency
## During Deployment
- [x] Run a script/sql query to set `isEmailVerified` to `true` for all
users with a Google/Microsoft email and all users that show an
indication of a valid subscription (e.g. linked credit card)
- I have created a draft migration file below that shows one possible
approach to implementing this change:
```typescript
import { MigrationInterface, QueryRunner } from 'typeorm';
export class UpdateEmailVerifiedForActiveUsers1733318043628
implements MigrationInterface
{
name = 'UpdateEmailVerifiedForActiveUsers1733318043628';
public async up(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> {
await queryRunner.query(`
CREATE TABLE core."user_email_verified_backup" AS
SELECT id, email, "isEmailVerified"
FROM core."user"
WHERE "deletedAt" IS NULL;
`);
await queryRunner.query(`
-- Update isEmailVerified for users who have been part of workspaces with active subscriptions
UPDATE core."user" u
SET "isEmailVerified" = true
WHERE EXISTS (
-- Check if user has been part of a workspace through userWorkspace table
SELECT 1
FROM core."userWorkspace" uw
JOIN core."workspace" w ON uw."workspaceId" = w.id
WHERE uw."userId" = u.id
-- Check for valid subscription indicators
AND (
w."activationStatus" = 'ACTIVE'
-- Add any other subscription-related conditions here
)
)
AND u."deletedAt" IS NULL;
`);
}
public async down(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> {
await queryRunner.query(`
UPDATE core."user" u
SET "isEmailVerified" = b."isEmailVerified"
FROM core."user_email_verified_backup" b
WHERE u.id = b.id;
`);
await queryRunner.query(`DROP TABLE core."user_email_verified_backup";`);
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Introduce unit tests to validate the behavior of the useSignInUpForm
hook. Tests cover default initialization, handling of developer
defaults, and prefilled values based on state.
## Context
avatarUrl is a TEXT field type so non nullable, which means if we try to
run a mutation with null it will either fail or be ignored. Here this is
the second option, done in sanitizeRecordInput where when a
fieldMetadata has isNullable=false and the value is null, we return
undefined. This caused the mutation to send an empty input and not
remove the avatar
This PR is only moving and renaming types, hooks and utils to
record-filter module folder.
- Moved and renamed types from object filter modules to record filter…-
Moved and renamed types from object filter modules to record filter
module
- Moved useApplyRecordFilter to record filter module
- Renamed util getOperandsForFilterDefinition to
getRecordFilterOperandsForRecordFilterDefinition
In this PR, I implemented or confirmed that the read-only mode works for
the following fields:
- [x] FormUuidFieldInput
- [x] FormRawJsonFieldInput
- [x] FormPhoneFieldInput
- [x] FormEmailsFieldInput
- [x] FormLinksFieldInput
- [x] FormAddressFieldInput
- [x] FormFullNameFieldInput
Fix production bug caused by old relation filter value.
**Draft, not tested yet at all, working on it right now.**
---------
Co-authored-by: ad-elias <elias@autodiligence.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
<img width="1349" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-13 at 17 18 24"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4f5da0e9-0245-41c6-bde2-4d52e0ba34ed"
/>
Feature flags are stored in DB and then cast as FeatureFlag gql type
from its corresponding enum.
This means if a value from the DB does not match that enum type, the gql
server will reject the call when returning the object in the resolver.
(see screenshot above)
To solve that, we want to do 2 things:
- The ORM should still return the feature flag even if it's not valid,
this is actually in the DB so we don't want to "hide" that, however we
now have a warning message.
- The service is not changed for the same reason, the limitation comes
from gql behaviour so this is not the goal of the service nor the ORM to
act on it (except the warning message)
- The resolver should be updated, here we want to filter-out non-valid
feature flags so it does not break the API.
Because featureFlags used to be auto-generated by nestjsquery and we
want to change its behavior, I had to manually create a resolveField for
featureFlags and remove the auto-generated one. That means we lose some
features such as filter/sort coming from nestjs-query pagination (which
is something we will want to implement once we will remove nestjs-query
but that's a whole other subject)
In this PR
- fixing Collapse on view groups views: aggregate bar should be included
in the collapse (@magrinj )
- respect the html table pattern: the aggregate bar is now a <tr>
element included in a <table> (before that, it was a <tr> not included
in anything)
- add a top-border on the aggregate bar
- introduce short labels for the on-cell value display (display "Empty"
instead of "Count empty" to lighten the interface)
- remove the feature flag !
