This PR is only moving and renaming types, hooks and utils to
record-filter module folder.
- Moved and renamed types from object filter modules to record filter…-
Moved and renamed types from object filter modules to record filter
module
- Moved useApplyRecordFilter to record filter module
- Renamed util getOperandsForFilterDefinition to
getRecordFilterOperandsForRecordFilterDefinition
Fix production bug caused by old relation filter value.
**Draft, not tested yet at all, working on it right now.**
---------
Co-authored-by: ad-elias <elias@autodiligence.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR fixes all followup that @Bonapara add on Discord.
- [x] When no group by is set, clicking on group by should open the
"field selection" menu
- [x] When closed, chevron should be "chevron-right" instead of
"chevron-up"
- [x] Sort : Add ability to switch from alphabetical to manual when
moving a option in sort alphabetical
- [x] Add subtext for group by and sort
- [x] Group by menu display bug
- [x] Changing the sort should not close the menu
- [x] Group by Activation -> shows empty state + is slow
- [x] Switching from Kanban view Settings to Table Options menu displays
an empty menu
- [x] Unnecessary spacing under groups
- [x] When no "select" are set on an object, redirect the user directly
to the new Select field page
- [x] Sort : Default should be manual
- [x] Hidding "no value" displays all options and remove the "hide empty
group" toggle
- [x] Hide Empty group option disappeared
- [x] Group by should not be persisted on "Locked/Main view" (**For now
we just disable the group by on main view**)
- [x] Hide Empty group should not be activated by default on
Opportunities Kanban view
- [ ] Animate the group opening/closing (**We'll be done later**)
Performance improvement:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd2acf66-0e56-45d0-8b2f-99c62e57d6f7https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80f1a2e1-9f77-4923-b85d-acb9cad96886
Also fix#9036
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
The DX is not great when you need to do a lot of database
resets/command.
Should we disable Typescript validation to speed things up? With this
and caching database:reset takes 1min instead of 2 on my machine.
See also: https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/issues/4136
And #9291 / #9293
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
In this PR, we are introducing aggregate queries on table views, behind
a feature flag.
This does not work with view groups yet, nor with views that have
records until the bottom. (both will be tackled next)
Fix#8757
This PR is adding the Add new button on view groups.
Also this PR fix an issue where the pending record can be draggable, and
is causing error.
<img width="1119" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 4 24 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fd01e99-c85e-4a06-a733-cbf3cc32957d">
It also start to issues with the way we're using Context.
We're initializing pretty much all Context like this:
```typescript
export const RecordTableContext = createContext<RecordTableContextProps>(
{} as RecordTableContextProps,
);
```
This is causing issues when by mistake we use the context like this
outside the Provider hierarchy:
```typescript
const context = useContext(RecordTableContext);
```
This is going to fail silently, and all the context variables become
undefined...
To fix this I've introduced an util called `createRequiredContext`, this
one is returning an array containing the provider and the hook to
retrieve the context.
The context is initialized to undefined inside this utility, this way we
can check if the value has been initialized with the provider to check
if we're inside it. It'll throw an error if this one is used outside the
provider.
The return values are properly typed, so `undefined` is not added to the
value of the Context.
I'll create a followup ticket to use this new utility function, if
that's ok and replace it everywhere in the codebase.
We can also consider adding a eslint rule to warn about the use of
`createContext` directly.
- create a serverless function when creating a new workflow code step
- add code editor in workflow code step
- move workflowVersion steps management from frontend to backend
- add a custom resolver for workflow-version management
- fix optimistic rendering on frontend
- fix css
- delete serverless function when deleting workflow code step
TODO
- Don't update serverlessFunction if no code change
- Factorize what can be between crud trigger and crud step
- Publish serverless version when activating workflow
- delete serverless functions when deleting workflow or workflowVersion
- fix optimistic rendering for code updates
- Unify CRUD types
<img width="1279" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3d97ee9f-4b96-4abc-9d36-5c0280058be4">
Fix#8758
This PR is migrating the recoil component state from v1 to v2 for board.
It also now share some states and logics between board and table,
further can be done later.
Lastly this PR fix an issue since the PR #8613 that was treating
no-value as a normal record-group.
Fix#4244 and #4356
This pull request introduces the new "view groups" capability, enabling
the reordering, hiding, and showing of columns in Kanban mode. The core
enhancement includes the addition of a new entity named `ViewGroup`,
which manages column behaviors and interactions.
#### Key Changes:
1. **ViewGroup Entity**:
The newly added `ViewGroup` entity is responsible for handling the
organization and state of columns.
This includes:
- The ability to reorder columns.
- The option to hide or show specific columns based on user preferences.
#### Conclusion:
This PR adds a significant new feature that enhances the flexibility of
Kanban views through the `ViewGroup` entity.
We'll later add the view group logic to table view too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
In this PR, I'm fixing part of the impact of soft deletion on optimistic
rendering.
## Backend Vision
1) Backend endpoints will not return soft deleted records (having
deletedAt set) by default. To get the softDeleted records, we will pass
a { withSoftDelete: true } additional param in the query.
2) Record relations will NEVER contain softDeleted relations
## Backend current state
Right now, we have the following behavior:
- if the query filters do not mention deletedAt, we don't return
softDeletedRecords
- if the query filters mention deletedAt, we take it into consideration.
Meaning that if we want to have the softDeleted records in any way we
need to do { or: [ deletedAt: NULL, deletedAt: NOT_NULL] }
## Optimistic rendering strategy
1) useDestroyOne/Many is triggering destroyOptimisticEffects (previously
deleteOptimisticEffects)
2) UseDeleteOne/Many and useRestoreOne/Many are actually triggering
updateOptimisticEffects (as they only update deletedAt field) AND we
need updateOptimisticEffects to take into account deletedAt (future
withSoftDelete: true) filter.
Closes#7336
Create 3 states:
- `contextStoreCurrentObjectMetadataIdState`: is set when we change
object metadata
- `contextStoreCurrentViewIdState`: is set when we change view
- `contextStoreTargetedRecordIdsState`: is set when we select records
inside a table or a board or when a show page is opened. Is reset when
we change view.
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
- Fix duplicate view field creation
- Fix redirect to proper settings data model page
- Refetch view fields after field creation (temporary solution)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5598
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
We used to not type properly the return of getRecordFromCache before the
work from last week.
The getViewFromCache function was patching this temporarily in a "dirty"
way.
Now that this is cleaner, I'm removing the typescript patch. This fixing
several behaviors on viewBar
Split from https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/4518
Related to #4766
Mutualizes eslint config between projects.
I didn't include `twenty-server` in this PR as this was causing too many
lint errors.
When writing to the normalized cache (record), it's crucial to use _refs
for relationships to avoid many problems. Essentially, we only deal with
level 0 and generate all fields to be comfortable with their defaults.
When writing in queries (which should be very rare, the only cases are
prefetch and the case of activities due to the nested query; I've
reduced this to a single file for activities
usePrepareFindManyActivitiesQuery 🙂), it's important to use queryFields
to avoid bugs. I've implemented them on the side of query generation and
record generation.
When doing an updateOne / createOne, etc., it's necessary to distinguish
between optimistic writing (which we actually want to do with _refs) and
the server response without refs. This allows for a clean write in the
optimistic cache without worrying about nesting (as the first point).
To simplify the whole activities part, write to the normalized cache
first. Then, base queries on it in an idempotent manner. This way,
there's no need to worry about the current page or action. The
normalized cache is up-to-date, so I update the queries. Same idea as
for optimisticEffects, actually.
Finally, I've triggered optimisticEffects rather than the manual update
of many queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* Store compact view status
* Rename to isCompact
* Fixes
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
