This PR is simple, it creates states for record sort, mirroring record
filter states.
It also implements RecordSortsComponentInstanceContext everywhere
RecordFiltersComponentInstanceContext is used.
This could be later merged into a common RecordContext concept but we
first need to decide how to handle the existing ContextStore and
RecordIndexContext and ideally end up with a unique context (or a
context provider component that wraps in all those contexts at once).
Some bugs are already present on main when trying to delete a sort, they
will be fixed in the next PRs.
In this huge (sorry!) PR:
- introducing objectMetadataItem in contextStore instead of
objectMetadataId which is more convenient
- splitting some big hooks into smaller parts to avoid re-renders
- removing Effects to avoid re-renders (especially onViewChange)
- making the view prefetch separate from favorites to avoid re-renders
- making the view prefetch load a state and add selectors on top of it
to avoir re-renders
As a result, the performance is WAY better (I suspect the favorite
implementation to trigger a lot of re-renders unfortunately).
However, we are still facing a random app freeze on view creation. I
could not investigate the root cause. As this seems to be already there
in the precedent release, we can move forward but this seems a urgent
follow up to me ==> EDIT: I've found the root cause after a few ours of
deep dive... an infinite loop in RecordTableNoRecordGroupBodyEffect...
prastoin edit: close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10253
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
This PR progressively introduces fieldMetadataItemUsedInDropdown instead
of filterDefinitionUsedInDropdown where most easy to replace.
This allows to use `fieldMetadataItemUsedInDropdown.id` instead of
`filterDefinition.fieldMetadataId`, which is one easy dependency to
remove on filter definition.
We still derive filterDefinition instead of fully replacing it, because
it will be easier to remove RecordFilterDefinition usage in a bottom-up
approach instead.
In multiple components of the filter dropdown, we try to replace
filterDefinition by fieldMetadataItem derivation : Icon, label, id,
type, etc.
We also introduce the usage of subFieldNameUsedInDropdown instead of
storing it dynamically on filterDefinition, for handling filtering on
composite sub fields.
The method `formatFieldMetadataItemAsFilterDefinition()` that is used to
derive filterDefinition from fieldMetadataItem is what was being used
originally to create the availableFilterDefinition state. (That is
already removed)
Fixed associated unit tests accordingly.
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
This PR refactors the record filter saving to view filters.
Before we used states to track the change of view filters, now we just
check if there's a difference between the current record filters and the
current view filters before saving.
We also use this check to show the reset and save buttons.
CRUD operations to perform on view filters are computed by utils , and .
Also added unit tests on those utils.
This PR is only moving and renaming types, hooks and utils to
record-filter module folder.
- Moved and renamed types from object filter modules to record filter…-
Moved and renamed types from object filter modules to record filter
module
- Moved useApplyRecordFilter to record filter module
- Renamed util getOperandsForFilterDefinition to
getRecordFilterOperandsForRecordFilterDefinition
- Added a new Seeder service to help with custom object seeds
- Added RichTextFieldInput to edit a rich text field directly on the
table, but deactivated it for now.
`No Value` view groups wasn't properly created when we select a group by
field metadata, this PR fix the issue.
Also a script is added to backfill the current view groups.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
In this PR, we are introducing aggregate queries on table views, behind
a feature flag.
This does not work with view groups yet, nor with views that have
records until the bottom. (both will be tackled next)
Fix#8758
This PR is migrating the recoil component state from v1 to v2 for board.
It also now share some states and logics between board and table,
further can be done later.
Lastly this PR fix an issue since the PR #8613 that was treating
no-value as a normal record-group.
Fixes#8591
1. Summary
We disabled hide/dnd(drag-and-drop) options for `No value` view group
intentionally in the first implementation. We want to change it to
behave like normal view groups, so enable hide/dnd for `No value` view
group as well.
2. Solution
I have removed the code that filters the `No value` group out of view
groups, so `No value` is stored in the same array as other view groups.
I have removed the `No value` flag check for `Hide` button on the
hamburger menu of the Kanban header. I had to update the code in
`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/views/utils/mapViewGroupsToRecordGroupDefinitions.ts`
because it was ignoring the visibility flag of the `No value` view group
and set it always to true. Also, it was always putting the `No value`
group last ignoring the previous position.
>**_I am not 100% confident in the changes I made in
`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/views/utils/mapViewGroupsToRecordGroupDefinitions.ts`.
I'd like to have a review from someone more familiar with that part._**
3. Recording
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e135e22e-6e3a-4f94-a898-aafc03bba060
Fix#4244 and #4356
This pull request introduces the new "view groups" capability, enabling
the reordering, hiding, and showing of columns in Kanban mode. The core
enhancement includes the addition of a new entity named `ViewGroup`,
which manages column behaviors and interactions.
#### Key Changes:
1. **ViewGroup Entity**:
The newly added `ViewGroup` entity is responsible for handling the
organization and state of columns.
This includes:
- The ability to reorder columns.
- The option to hide or show specific columns based on user preferences.
#### Conclusion:
This PR adds a significant new feature that enhances the flexibility of
Kanban views through the `ViewGroup` entity.
We'll later add the view group logic to table view too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Solves issue #5917.
This PR is now ready for the first review!
Filters do not fully work yet, there's a problem applying multiple
filters like the following:
```
{
and: [
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
gte: start.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
lte: end.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
],
}
```
I'll do my best to dig into it tonight!
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
# This PR
- Moves dev and ci scripts to the `project.json` file in the
twenty-front package
- Adds a project.json file in the root of the project with the main
start command that start both twenty-server and twenty-front
applications concurrently
- Updates the script command of the root project with the start:prod
command (replacing the start command which will be used in dev with the
help of nx)
- Add a start:prod command in the twenty-front app, replacing the start
command (now used for dev purpose)
Issue ref #4645
@charlesBochet @FelixMalfait please let me know how can I improve it
---------
Co-authored-by: Thaïs Guigon <guigon.thais@gmail.com>
- Fix default value sent to backend, using single quotes by default
- Use default value in field definition and column definition so that
field inputs can access it
- Used currency default value in CurrencyFieldInput
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
* feat: display record identifier field as first column in table
& forbid hiding and moving record identifier column
Closes#3303
* refactor: add availableTableColumnKeysSelectorScopeMap
* feat: show plus icon button for label identifier column and dropdown menu for other columns
* fix: use label identifier field value in RecordShowPage title
* refactor: remove availableColumnKeys selector
* refactor: review - compute label identifier logic in mapViewFieldsToColumnDefinitions + remove selectors
* fix: several fixes
* fix: fix board fields isVisible
* fix: fix board fields reordering
* fix: more board fields fixes
* fix: fix hiddenTableColumnsSelectorScopeMap
* Store compact view status
* Rename to isCompact
* Fixes
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
