# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
## Introduction
Added coverage on the `useDeleteOneRecord` hooks, especially its
optimistic behavior feature.
Introduced a new testing tool `InMemoryTestingCacheInstance` that has
builtin very basic expectors in order to avoid future duplication when
covering others record hooks `update, create, destroy` etc etc
## Notes
Added few comments in this PR regarding some builtin functions I've
created around companies and people mocked object model and that I think
could be cool to spread and centralize within a dedicated "class
template"
Also put in light that unless I'm mistaken some tests are running on
`RecordNode` and not `RecordObject`
Took few directions on my own that as I always I would suggestion nor
remarks on them !
Let me know
## Misc
- Should we refactor `useDeleteOneRecord` tests to follow `eachTesting`
pattern ? => I feel like this is inappropriate as this hooks is already
high level, the only plus value would be less tests code despite
readability IMO
Prepare for better version upgrade system + split admin panel into two
permissions + fix GraphQL generation detection
---------
Co-authored-by: ehconitin <nitinkoche03@gmail.com>
Workspace Member will get their own record page in the future.
This PR lays backend changes to prepare for this:
- Settings most fields on WorkspaceMember as system fields
- Renaming workspaceMember/workspaceMemberId to
forWorkspaceMember/forWorkspaceMemberId as it conflicts with the morph
relationship, if we want to be able to add a workspace member as
favorite
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/410
- Added `openRecordIn` column in the `view` entity, which is set to
`SIDE_PANEL` by default
- Created a new option inside the view option dropdown to be able to set
`openRecordIn`
- Updated all record show page openings to reflect the setting behavior
- For `workflow`, `workflowVersion` and `workflowRun` (what I call
workflow objects), we want the default view `openRecordIn` to be set to
`RECORD_PAGE`. When seeding the views for the new workspaces, we set
`openRecordIn` to `RECORD_PAGE` for workflow objects. Since the workflow
objects views `openRecordIn` will be set to the default value
`SIDE_PANEL` for the existing workspaces when the sync metadata runs, I
created a script to run in the 0.43 update to update this value.
- Updated `closeCommandMenu` because of problems introduced by the
animate presence wrapper around the command menu. We now reset the
states at the end of the animation.
Note: We want to be able to open all workflow objects pages in the side
panel, but this requires some refactoring of the workflow module. For
now @Bonapara wanted to allow the possibility to change the
`openRecordIn` setting to `SIDE_PANEL` even for the workflows even if
it's buggy and not ready for the moment. Since this is an experimental
feature, it shouldn't cause too many problems.
## Context
With the new permissions system, we now need to hide some items from the
settings navigation and gate some routes so they can't be accessed
directly.
To avoid having to set permission gates in all the component pages, I'm
introducing wrapper at the route level and in the Navigation. This is
not required and is mostly for pages that are strictly mapped to a
single permission, for the rest we still need to use the different hooks
manually but it should avoid a bit of boilerplate for most of the cases.
- currentUserWorkspaceState to access settingsPermissions
- SettingsProtectedRouteWrapper in the router that can take a
settingFeature or a featureFlag as a gate logic, if the currentUser does
not have access to the settingFeature or the featureFlag is not enabled
they will be redirected to the profile page.
- SettingsNavigationItemWrapper & SettingsNavigationSectionWrapper. The
former will check the same logic as SettingsProtectedRouteWrapper and
not display the item if needed. The later will check if all
SettingsNavigationItemWrapper are not visible and hide itself if that's
the case.
- useHasSettingsPermission to get a specific permission state for the
current user
- useSettingsPermissionMap to get a map of all permissions with their
values for the current user
- useFeatureFlagsMap same but for featureFlags
# Introduction
While importing records encountering missing expected fields when
writting a fragment from apollo cache
## Updates
### 1/ `createdBy` Default value
When inserting in cache in create single or many we will now make
optimistic behavior on the createdBy value
### 2/ `createRecordInCache` dynamically create `recordGrqlFields`
When creating an entry in cache, we will now dynamically generate fields
to be written in the fragment instead of expecting all of them. As by
nature record could be partial
### 3/ Strictly typed `RecordGqlFields`
# Conclusion
closes#9927
Introduce isCustomDomainEnabled field in Workspace entity to manage
custom domain activation. Update related services, types, and logic to
validate and toggle the custom domain's status dynamically based on its
current state. This ensures accurate domain configurations are reflected
across the system.
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
At the moment when updating any record cache occurence, we will build a
fragment that will expect all of the object metadata item fields to be
provided.
Which result in the following traces: ( in the video companies aren't
fetch with companyId and other missing fields )
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56eab7c1-8f01-45ff-8f5d-78737b788b92
By definition as we're using graphql we might not request every record's
fields each time we wanna consume them.
In this way we will now dynamically compute or expect depending on the
CRUD operation specific fields to be written in the cache, and not all
of them
Tested all optimistic and failure management use cases
## Covering cache
Added coverage only for the `deleteOne` and `deleteMany` hooks, it cover
only the record record cache and not its relations hydratation ( for the
moment )
## Why not closing #9927
Unless I'm mistaken everything done here have fixed the same logs/traces
issue for updates and deletion but not creation.
Which means we still need to investigate the mass upload from import and
prefillRecord behavior
In a nutshell: went over each `updateRecordFromCache` calls, still need
to do all `createRecordInCache` calls
related to #9927
## Conlusion
Sorry for the big PR should have ejected into a specific one for the
`MinimalRecord` refactor
Will also continue covering others hooks later in my week as for the
`deleteOne`
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
# Content
- Introduce the `workspaceUrls` property. It contains two
sub-properties: `customUrl, subdomainUrl`. These endpoints are used to
access the workspace. Even if the `workspaceUrls` is invalid for
multiple reasons, the `subdomainUrl` remains valid.
- Introduce `ResolveField` workspaceEndpoints to avoid unnecessary URL
computation on the frontend part.
- Add a `forceSubdomainUrl` to avoid custom URL using a query parameter
Refresh of `objectmetadataitems` was not happening fast enough. Page was
breaking when enabling the feature flag. Instead of not storing worklow
objects in state, we will use the feature flag to block on read. This
way we avoid race conditions
<img width="1511" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-02-04 à 14 11 56"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/912cc59a-f422-48ab-84b7-7fdd7bbc35c1"
/>
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Fixes
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1333822806504247467
In this PR:
- Make the workflow step title input readonly when the visualizer is in
readonly mode
- Make all the fields of the Update Record and Delete Record readonly
when the visualizer is in readonly mode
- Create stories for the Create Record, Updated Record and Delete Record
actions; I'm checking for the default mode and several variants of the
disabled mode
- Set up mocks for the workflows and use them in msw handlers
Follow up:
- We use `readonly` and `disabled` alternatively; these are two
different states when talking about a HTML `<input />` element. I think
we should settle on a single word.
- Refactor the `<WorkflowSingleRecordPicker />` component to behave as
other selects
| Current component | Should look like |
|--------|--------|
| 
| 
|
The property name "hasValidEntrepriseKey" was corrected to
"hasValidEnterpriseKey" across multiple files for consistency and
accuracy. This ensures proper alignment with naming conventions and
avoids potential issues in usage or understanding.
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
# Introduction
By initially fixing this Fixes#9381, discovered other behavior that
have been fix.
Overall we encountered a bug that corrupts a workspace and make the
browser + api crash
This issue https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/25
suggests a refactor that has final save button instead of auto-save
## `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` form default value
The default value resulted in being undefined, resulting in react hook
form `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` is required field error.
### Fix
Setting default value fallback to `null` as field is `nullable`
## `SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` never triggers form
Unless I'm mistaken in production touching any fields within
`SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` would never trigger form
submission until you also modify `SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm`
fields
### Fix
Provide and apply `onblur` that triggers the form on both
`SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` inputs
## Wrong default `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` on first page render
When landing on the page for the first time, if a custom
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` has been set it won't be computed
within the `PreviewCard`.
Occurs when `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` form default value is
undefined, due to `any` injection.
### Fix
In the `getLabelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` check the
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataIdFormValue` definition, if undefined
fallback to current `objectMetadata` identifier
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Billing portal is created in settings/billing page even if subscription
is canceled, causing server internal error. -> Skip back end request
Bonus : display settings/billing page with disabled button even if
subscription is canceled
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
- migrate WorkspaceActivationStatus to twenty-shared (and update case to
make FE and BE consistent)
- introduce isWorkspaceActiveOrSuspended in twenty-shared
- refactor the code to use it (when we fetch data on the FE, we want to
keep SUSPENDED workspace working + when we sync workspaces we want it
too)
### Context
- Update /plan-required page to let users get free trial without credit
card plan
- Update usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation to redirect paused and
canceled subscription (suspended workspace) to /settings/billing page
### To do
- [x] Update usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation test
- [x] Update ChooseYourPlan sb test
closes#9520
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
Closestwentyhq/twenty#8240
This PR introduces email verification for non-Microsoft/Google Emails:
## Email Verification SignInUp Flow:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/740e9714-5413-4fd8-b02e-ace728ea47ef
The email verification link is sent as part of the
`SignInUpStep.EmailVerification`. The email verification token
validation is handled on a separate page (`AppPath.VerifyEmail`). A
verification email resend can be triggered from both pages.
## Email Verification Flow Screenshots (In Order):
## Sent Email Details (Subject & Template):
### Successful Email Verification Redirect:
### Unsuccessful Email Verification (invalid token, invalid email, token
expired, user does not exist, etc.):
### Force Sign In When Email Not Verified:
# TODOs:
## Sign Up Process
- [x] Introduce server-level environment variable
IS_EMAIL_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED (defaults to false)
- [x] Ensure users joining an existing workspace through an invite are
not required to validate their email
- [x] Generate an email verification token
- [x] Store the token in appToken
- [x] Send email containing the verification link
- [x] Create new email template for email verification
- [x] Create a frontend page to handle verification requests
## Sign In Process
- [x] After verifying user credentials, check if user's email is
verified and prompt to to verify
- [x] Show an option to resend the verification email
## Database
- [x] Rename the `emailVerified` colum on `user` to to `isEmailVerified`
for consistency
## During Deployment
- [x] Run a script/sql query to set `isEmailVerified` to `true` for all
users with a Google/Microsoft email and all users that show an
indication of a valid subscription (e.g. linked credit card)
- I have created a draft migration file below that shows one possible
approach to implementing this change:
```typescript
import { MigrationInterface, QueryRunner } from 'typeorm';
export class UpdateEmailVerifiedForActiveUsers1733318043628
implements MigrationInterface
{
name = 'UpdateEmailVerifiedForActiveUsers1733318043628';
public async up(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> {
await queryRunner.query(`
CREATE TABLE core."user_email_verified_backup" AS
SELECT id, email, "isEmailVerified"
FROM core."user"
WHERE "deletedAt" IS NULL;
`);
await queryRunner.query(`
-- Update isEmailVerified for users who have been part of workspaces with active subscriptions
UPDATE core."user" u
SET "isEmailVerified" = true
WHERE EXISTS (
-- Check if user has been part of a workspace through userWorkspace table
SELECT 1
FROM core."userWorkspace" uw
JOIN core."workspace" w ON uw."workspaceId" = w.id
WHERE uw."userId" = u.id
-- Check for valid subscription indicators
AND (
w."activationStatus" = 'ACTIVE'
-- Add any other subscription-related conditions here
)
)
AND u."deletedAt" IS NULL;
`);
}
public async down(queryRunner: QueryRunner): Promise<void> {
await queryRunner.query(`
UPDATE core."user" u
SET "isEmailVerified" = b."isEmailVerified"
FROM core."user_email_verified_backup" b
WHERE u.id = b.id;
`);
await queryRunner.query(`DROP TABLE core."user_email_verified_backup";`);
}
}
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Eliminated all references to `isSSOEnabled` across the frontend,
backend, and configuration files. This change simplifies the codebase by
removing unnecessary feature flag checks, associated logic, and
environment variables. The SSO feature remains available without
reliance on this flag.
Replaced user-based parameterization with workspace-focused logic across
seed scripts, mocks, and billing services. Removed redundant `user`
references and standardized to `workspace` to align with updated
business rules. Adjusted mock data and tests to reflect these changes.
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9295
The DX is not great when you need to do a lot of database
resets/command.
Should we disable Typescript validation to speed things up? With this
and caching database:reset takes 1min instead of 2 on my machine.
See also: https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/issues/4136
And #9291 / #9293
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
