Better catching label input
- there were absolutely no check on label when creating the target field
while doing a relation : we crearted these checks here.
- We keep the label quite open to special char as discussed with Felix.
so mostly checking length of label.
- We check that label does not already exists on the targetted object
- making sure the Target fieldinput label is checked before we create
it. The previous checks are not enough since the label goes through
anoteher merthod before going in the database
- validate-metadata-name-is-camel-case.utils.ts : making sure we can use
this error message for metadata name and for target label
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
# Introduction
This PR might have a lot of impact on tested validation
Avoid catching programmatically thrown error
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
Added to the existing useGraphQLErrorHandlerHook yoga hook to increment
metrics after all query executions based on their error codes. I
originally wanted to create a new useMetrics hook but most of the error
handling was done in useGraphQLErrorHandlerHook so we decided to keep it
there for now.
<img width="1310" alt="Screenshot 2025-06-24 at 15 58 26"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/498d3754-851a-4051-a5c2-23ac8253aa6a"
/>
This PR improves error handling in `handleDriverException` by adding a
duck-typing check for `MessageImportDriverException` objects. It ensures
that errors are correctly identified and processed even if they are
received as plain objects rather than class instances. This change
prevents missed exception handling and increases the robustness of the
message import process.
In this PR:
- add query hashKey to ObjectMetadataItems query graphql cache to avoid
caching outdated queries
- improve performance by removing ResolveField at FieldLevel and adding
this at resolver level
This PR fixes this issue from the connected account refresh token
service that is
This PR fixes error handling in `handleDriverException` by ensuring that
errors resembling `MessageImportDriverException` are correctly detected,
even if they are plain objects and not true class instances. This
prevents missed exception handling due to failed `instanceof` checks.
Was introduced by [this
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12233) that did not know all
provider cases that can occur.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12589
Fixes#11927
I have added 'format' in the zod schema of currency, and for using it, I
am separately passing 'format' to 'currencyDisplay.'
The feature is working correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Rastoin <45004772+prastoin@users.noreply.github.com>
In this PR:
## Improve recompute metadata cache performance. We are aiming for
~100ms
Deleting relationMetadata table and FKs pointing on it
Fetching indexMetadata and indexFieldMetadata in a separate query as
typeorm is suboptimizing
## Remove caching lock
As recomputing the metadata cache is lighter, we try to stop preventing
multiple concurrent computations. This also simplifies interfaces
## Introduce self recovery mecanisms to recompute cache automatically if
corrupted
Aka getFreshObjectMetadataMaps
## custom object resolver performance improvement: 1sec to 200ms
Double check queries and indexes used while creating a custom object
Remove the queries to db to use the cached objectMetadataMap
## reduce objectMetadataMaps to 500kb
<img width="222" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2370dc80-49b6-4b63-8d5e-30c5ebdaa062"
/>
We used to stored 3 fieldMetadataMaps (byId, byName, byJoinColumnName).
While this is great for devXP, this is not great for performances.
Using the same mecanisme as for objectMetadataMap: we only keep byIdMap
and introduce two otherMaps to idByName, idByJoinColumnName to make the
bridge
## Add dataloader on IndexMetadata (aka indexMetadataList in the API)
## Improve field resolver performances too
## Deprecate ClientConfig
- id field should only be available for search records action
- create record action does not work for relations. Requires to send
`accountOwner: { id: string }` instead of `accountOwner: string`
- hidding `runs` for version views as we did for workflows
Let's introduce an object-limited role for Tim, to test and/or spot
incompatibilities with restricted permissions in the future.
Our main user tim@apple.dev is now assigned a role that has all settings
permissions, and all object permissions except for update on Pets (to
test read-only view) and read on Rockets.
Since we still need an admin user for each workspace we are introducing
a new member, Jane, who has the admin role
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
We were using a global ValidationPipe in main.ts. This is an issue as
@Controllers should return HttpExecption and @Resolvers should return
GraphqlErrors
Removing the global pipe and creating a ResolverValidationPipe able to
generate GraphqlError. We also need to handle the exception in a filter
to avoid nest to think it's unhandled and make it flow to logs
Next step:
- it would be nice to have both @UsePipes(ResolverValidationPipe) +
@UseFilters(GraphqlValidationExceptionFilter) come together. This should
be possible if we create a @GraphQLResolver annotation
Test was flaky because sometimes a calendar event is associated to an
account which the user does not have access to
Removing the snapshot to test the exact response value but the test is
still there (more flexible)
In order to put back relations on track, we need to allow the
preexisting indexes to be created in indexmetadata, but also to avoid
failure when the migration runner will try to re-apply a pre-existing
index
- Fix an issue where custom object were seeded with 2 views, and with
the wrong icon
- ACME becomes YCombinator
- Allow 2 workspaces to have different metadata seeded
- Add many seeds for messages
- Add many seeds for calendar events
- Randomize createdBy for person and companies
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
This migration has been introduced in 0.54 we should determine how we
wanna handle retro-compatibility with this, might not wanna merge this
one latest main 🤔 but only a new 0.54 patch
related to
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12651#issuecomment-2988164122
## Concerns
If a workspace fails this migration that's not a good sign, the metadata
schema should be completely empty since 0.54 `metadata` merge into
`core` migration.
Please review you existing entries in the schema and verify they exists
in the dest `core` one
Why : we had an issue impoting events du to CalendarEvents not yet
existing while inserting the CalendarChannelAssociation due to inverted
method in the service
This PR refactors the calendar event import logic by
- renaming
- splitting utility functions for better clarity and maintainability.
- adding TSDoc comments to explain the purpose and uniqueness of the
`eventExternalId` field in calendar event associations
Fixes#12690
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12343
Adding a transform step for any field phone in order to infer country
code and calling code from the number if they're provided
## Edges cases
```ts
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_NUMBER:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_CALLING_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_CALLING_CODE_AND_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_CALLING_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_URL:
```
## Coverage
Note: Will handle REST api integration testing pivot and UPDATE
operation later in the afternoon, critical bug appeared that I prefer
handling before improving this PR coverage, also would be too many
updates
Note2: Haven't fuzzed all of the string inputs, would seem overkill for
such a use case, to be debated
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/phone/create-one-field-metadata-phone.integration-spec.ts (23.609 s)
Phone field metadata tests suite
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field (1397 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with number and other information (930 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international format and other information (893 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international and infer other information from it but not the countryCode as its shared (825 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international and infer other information from it (818 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with empty payload (827 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with number and other information (894 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international format and other information (1024 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international and infer other information from it but not the countryCode as its shared (808 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international and infer other information from it (751 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with empty payload (739 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field without country or calling code at all (776 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid country code (782 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid calling code (858 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting country code and calling code (872 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid phone number format (1489 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number country code (1425 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number calling code (1553 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field without country or calling code at all (814 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid country code (813 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid calling code (742 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting country code and calling code (783 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid phone number format (731 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number country code (947 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number calling code (822 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 25 passed, 25 total
Snapshots: 14 passed, 14 total
Time: 23.627 s
```
