We should not depend on the foreign data wrapper type to manage distant
table. The remote server should be enough to handle the table creation.
Here is the new flow to fetch available tables:
- check if the remote server have available tables already stored
- if not, import full schema in a temporary schema
- copy the tables into the available tables field
- delete the schema
Left todo:
- update remote server input for postgres so we receive the schema
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
1/ When the user inputs wrong connection informations, we do not inform
him. He will only see that no tables are available.
We will display a connection failed status if an error is raised testing
the connection
2/ If the connection fails, it should still be possible to delete the
server. Today, since we try first to delete the tables, the connection
failure throws an error that will prevent server deletion. Using the
foreign tables instead of calling the distant DB.
3/ Redirect to connection show page instead of connection list after
creation
4/ Today, foreign tables are fetched without the server name. This is a
mistake because we need to know which foreign table is linked with which
server. Updating the associated query.
<img width="632" alt="Capture d’écran 2024-04-12 à 10 52 49"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/22936103/9e8406b8-75d0-494c-ac1f-5e9fa7100f5c">
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
Closes#4556
- Renames some pages and components after discussion about terminology
with @thomtrp.
- Creates the Settings/Integrations/Database/Connection page.
