# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/748
In the frame of the work on permissions we
- remove all raw queries possible to use repositories instead
- forbid usage workspaceDataSource.executeRawQueries()
- restrict usage of workspaceDataSource.query() to force developers to
pass on shouldBypassPermissionChecks to use it.
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles
## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc
## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment
## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
First and main step of
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/747
We are implementing a permission check layer in our custom
WorkspaceEntityManager by overriding all the db-executing methods (this
PR only overrides some as a POC, the rest will be done in the next PR).
Our custom repositories call entity managers under the hood to interact
with the db so this solves the repositories case too.
This is still behind the feature flag IsPermissionsV2Enabled.
In the next PR
- finish overriding all the methods required in WorkspaceEntityManager
- add tests
No need to audit log workflow runs as it's already a form of audit log.
Add more audit log for other objects
Rename MessagingTelemetry to MessagingMonitoring
Merge Analytics and Audit in one (Audit)
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
From now on workflow entities and views will be seed for every new
workspace. What will prevent user to see those is the feature flag used
in frontend. It will prevent workflow objects to be stored in the recoil
state.
Without feature flag, workflows will:
- remain invisible in metadata
- not be accessible through views or show page
- remain invisible on side menu
Fixes bug introduced in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8193
Taking into account linked event name `linked-{eventName}` as before
issue
## Before
`linked-created` and `linked-updated` activity targets were not created
in `timelineActivity` table
## After
`linked-created` and `linked-updated` activity targets are created in
`timelineActivity` table
## Context
ObjectMetadataService became quite large and handles too many
responsibilities. I'm trying to refactor a bit this part in preparation
of a larger work that will combine object-metadata services and
sync-metadata logic
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_ICONS that can be reused in relation
creation to refer to a standard object icon.
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELD_IDS that can be used with an object
name to get its standard field ids.
- Moved migration, record and relation creations to dedicated services,
refactored to improve performances and readability
- Refactored some validation logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Following figma updates
https://www.figma.com/design/PNBfTgOVraw557OXChYagk/Explo?node-id=21872-7929&t=DOUzd6rzwr6lprcs-0
- No activity targets for workflow entities for now
- Adding a direct relation between workflow run et workflow
- Adding a status on the version (draft, active, deactivated)
- Adding a list of statuses on workflow
- publishedVersionId => lastPublishedVersionId
Also adding:
- the endpoint to deactivate a version
In this PR:
- adding Favorites to Tasks and Notes
- fixing inconsistencies between custom object creation and sync of
standard fields of custom objects
- fixing workspaceCacheVersion not used to invalidate existing
datasource
## Context
LabelIdentifier and ImageIdentifier are metadata info attached to
objectMetadata that are used to display a record in a more readable way.
Those columns point to existing fields that are part of the object.
For example, for a relation picker of a person, we will show a record
using the "name" labelIdentifier and the "avatarUrl" imageIdentifier.
<img width="215" alt="Screenshot 2024-07-11 at 18 45 51"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/1834158/488f8294-0d7c-4209-b763-2499716ef29d">
Currently, the FE has a specific logic for company and people objects
and we have a way to update this value via the API for custom objects,
but the code is not flexible enough to change other standard objects.
This PR updates the WorkspaceEntity API so we can now provide the
labelIdentifier and imageIdentifier in the WorkspaceEntity decorator.
Example:
```typescript
@WorkspaceEntity({
standardId: STANDARD_OBJECT_IDS.activity,
namePlural: 'activities',
labelSingular: 'Activity',
labelPlural: 'Activities',
description: 'An activity',
icon: 'IconCheckbox',
labelIdentifierStandardId: ACTIVITY_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.title,
})
@WorkspaceIsSystem()
export class ActivityWorkspaceEntity extends BaseWorkspaceEntity {
@WorkspaceField({
standardId: ACTIVITY_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.title,
type: FieldMetadataType.TEXT,
label: 'Title',
description: 'Activity title',
icon: 'IconNotes',
})
title: string;
...
```
Insert inside AuditLog table are all failing due to objectMetadataId
column missing.
The FieldMetadata was sharing the same standard-id with another one
(objectName) so it was skipped during the comparison step of the
sync-metadata.
Running a sync-metadata again should fix this issue. Note that this
column is non-nullable so if the table contains existing records, it
will fail. However, since the insert was failing I'm assuming the table
is empty anyway.
This PR introduce a new decorator named `@WorkspaceJoinColumn`, the goal
of this one is to manually declare the join columns inside the workspace
entities, so we don't have to rely on `ObjectRecord` type.
This decorator can be used that way:
```typescript
@WorkspaceRelation({
standardId: ACTIVITY_TARGET_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.company,
type: RelationMetadataType.MANY_TO_ONE,
label: 'Company',
description: 'ActivityTarget company',
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
inverseSideTarget: () => CompanyWorkspaceEntity,
inverseSideFieldKey: 'activityTargets',
})
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
company: Relation<CompanyWorkspaceEntity> | null;
// The argument is the name of the relation above
@WorkspaceJoinColumn('company')
companyId: string | null;
```
This PR introduces an `upsert` parameter (along the existing `data`
param) for `createOne` and `createMany` mutations.
When upsert is set to `true`, the function will look for records with
the same id if an id was passed. If not id was passed, it will leverage
the existing duplicate check mechanism to find a duplicate. If a record
is found, then the function will perform an update instead of a create.
Unfortunately I had to remove some nice tests that existing on the args
factory. Those tests where mostly testing the duplication rule
generation logic but through a GraphQL angle. Since I moved the
duplication rule logic to a dedicated service, if I kept the tests but
mocked the service we wouldn't really be testing anything useful. The
right path would be to create new tests for this service that compare
the JSON output and not the GraphQL output but I chose not to work on
this as it's equivalent to rewriting the tests from scratch and I have
other competing priorities.
This PR is replacing and removing all the raw queries and repositories
with the new `TwentyORM` and injection system using
`@InjectWorkspaceRepository`.
Some logic that was contained inside repositories has been moved to the
services.
In this PR we're only replacing repositories for calendar feature.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
### Overview
This PR introduces significant enhancements to the MessageQueue module
by integrating `@Processor`, `@Process`, and `@InjectMessageQueue`
decorators. These changes streamline the process of defining and
managing queue processors and job handlers, and also allow for
request-scoped handlers, improving compatibility with services that rely
on scoped providers like TwentyORM repositories.
### Key Features
1. **Decorator-based Job Handling**: Use `@Processor` and `@Process`
decorators to define job handlers declaratively.
2. **Request Scope Support**: Job handlers can be scoped per request,
enhancing integration with request-scoped services.
### Usage
#### Defining Processors and Job Handlers
The `@Processor` decorator is used to define a class that processes jobs
for a specific queue. The `@Process` decorator is applied to methods
within this class to define specific job handlers.
##### Example 1: Specific Job Handlers
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('taskQueue')
export class TaskProcessor {
@Process('taskA')
async handleTaskA(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task A with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task A
}
@Process('taskB')
async handleTaskB(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task B with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task B
}
}
```
In the example above, `TaskProcessor` is responsible for processing jobs
in the `taskQueue`. The `handleTaskA` method will only be called for
jobs with the name `taskA`, while `handleTaskB` will be called for
`taskB` jobs.
##### Example 2: General Job Handler
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('generalQueue')
export class GeneralProcessor {
@Process()
async handleAnyJob(job: { id: string, name: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling job ${job.name} with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for any job
}
}
```
In this example, `GeneralProcessor` handles all jobs in the
`generalQueue`, regardless of the job name. The `handleAnyJob` method
will be invoked for every job added to the `generalQueue`.
#### Adding Jobs to a Queue
You can use the `@InjectMessageQueue` decorator to inject a queue into a
service and add jobs to it.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';
import { InjectMessageQueue, MessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Injectable()
export class TaskService {
constructor(
@InjectMessageQueue('taskQueue') private readonly taskQueue: MessageQueue,
) {}
async addTaskA(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskA', data);
}
async addTaskB(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskB', data);
}
}
```
In this example, `TaskService` adds jobs to the `taskQueue`. The
`addTaskA` and `addTaskB` methods add jobs named `taskA` and `taskB`,
respectively, to the queue.
#### Using Scoped Job Handlers
To utilize request-scoped job handlers, specify the scope in the
`@Processor` decorator. This is particularly useful for services that
use scoped repositories like those in TwentyORM.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue, Scope } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor({ name: 'scopedQueue', scope: Scope.REQUEST })
export class ScopedTaskProcessor {
@Process('scopedTask')
async handleScopedTask(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling scoped task with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for scoped task, which might use request-scoped services
}
}
```
Here, the `ScopedTaskProcessor` is associated with `scopedQueue` and
operates with request scope. This setup is essential when the job
handler relies on services that need to be instantiated per request,
such as scoped repositories.
### Migration Notes
- **Decorators**: Refactor job handlers to use `@Processor` and
`@Process` decorators.
- **Request Scope**: Utilize the scope option in `@Processor` if your
job handlers depend on request-scoped services.
Fix#5628
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR is updating all object metadata entities with the new
decorators, and deleting the old ones.
This way we can use the new TwentyORM with all the standard objects.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
## Context
JobsModule is hard to maintain because we provide all the jobs there,
including their dependencies. This PR aims to split jobs in dedicated
modules.
Refactored the code to introduce two different concepts:
- AuditLogs (immutable, raw data)
- TimelineActivities (user-friendly, transformed data)
Still some work needed:
- Add message, files, calendar events to timeline (~2 hours if done
naively)
- Refactor repository to try to abstract concept when we can (tbd, wait
for Twenty ORM)
- Introduce ability to display child timelines on parent timeline with
filtering (~2 days)
- Improve UI: add links to open note/task, improve diff display, etc
(half a day)
- Decide the path forward for Task vs Notes: either introduce a new
field type "Record Type" and start going into that direction ; or split
in two objects?
- Trigger updates when a field is changed (will be solved by real-time /
websockets: 2 weeks)
- Integrate behavioral events (1 day for POC, 1 week for
clean/documented)
<img width="1248" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-12 at 09 24 49"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/6399865/9428db1a-ab2b-492c-8b0b-d4d9a36e81fa">
