Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
41f3a63962 [BUGFIX] ObjectMetadata item server validation (#10699)
# Introduction
This PR contains several SNAPSHOT files explaining big +

While refactoring the Object Model settings page in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10653, encountered a critical
issue when submitting either one or both names with `""` empty string
hard corrupting a workspace.

This motivate this PR reviewing server side validation

I feel like we could share zod schema between front and back

## Refactored server validation
What to expect from Names:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Contains only a-z A-Z and 0-9
- Follows camelCase
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )

What to expect from Labels:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive ( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )

close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10694

## Creation integrations tests
Created new integrations tests, following
[EachTesting](https://jestjs.io/docs/api#testeachtablename-fn-timeout)
pattern and uses snapshot to assert errors message. These tests cover
several failing use cases and started to implement ones for the happy
path but object metadata item deletion is currently broken unless I'm
mistaken @Weiko is on it

## Notes
- [ ] As we've added new validation rules towards names and labels we
should scan db in order to standardize existing values using either a
migration command or manual check
- [ ] Will review in an other PR the update path, adding integrations
tests and so on
2025-03-11 12:14:37 +01:00
589a0c7b2d Fix graphql conflict between role custom object and role dto (#10479)
## Context
Following the strategy where we want to block custom object creation
when the type is reserved by core objects. The issue happened again with
the recently introduced role table.
2025-02-25 15:46:06 +01:00
8b8b9fe55b Add "type" to reserved keywords in object metadata validation (#8548)
This PR adds "type" to the reserved keywords list in
validate-object-metadata-input.util.ts. This prevents users from
creating objects with "type" as a key, which has caused issues in the
past .
issue solved #8543 

1.Updated the RESERVED_KEYWORDS array to include "type"

---------

Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
2024-11-18 15:10:49 +01:00
51c54d4c5b validation on Select field (#8316)
fix #8204
I changed "API keys" to "API values".
Stopped inputting special characters in Select field option keys.

@lucasbordeau please check the changes and tell me if I need to do any
other changes. :)

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2024-11-14 17:46:18 +01:00
28815f54fe Refactor object metadata service (#8123)
## Context
ObjectMetadataService became quite large and handles too many
responsibilities. I'm trying to refactor a bit this part in preparation
of a larger work that will combine object-metadata services and
sync-metadata logic

- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_ICONS that can be reused in relation
creation to refer to a standard object icon.
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELD_IDS that can be used with an object
name to get its standard field ids.
- Moved migration, record and relation creations to dedicated services,
refactored to improve performances and readability
- Refactored some validation logic

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2024-10-28 14:13:15 +01:00
414f2ac498 Support custom object renaming (#7504)
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-5491](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-5491).
This ticket was imported from:
[TWNTY-5491](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5491)

 --- 

### Description

**How To Test:**\
1. Reset db using `npx nx database:reset twenty-server` on this PR

1. Run both backend and frontend
2. Navigate to `settings/data-model/objects/ `page
3. Select a `Custom `object from the list or create a new `Custom
`object
4. Navigate to custom object details page and click on edit button
5. Finally edit the object details.

**Issues and bugs**
The Typecheck is failing but we could not see this error locally
There is a bug after updating the label of a custom object. View title
is not updated till refreshing the page. We could not find a consistent
way to update this, should we reload the page after editing an object?


![](https://assets-service.gitstart.com/45430/03cd560f-a4f6-4ce2-9d78-6d3a9f56d197.png)###
Demo



<https://www.loom.com/share/64ecb57efad7498d99085cb11480b5dd?sid=28d0868c-e54f-454d-8432-3f789be9e2b7>

### Refs

#5491

---------

Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
2024-10-24 11:52:30 +00:00
ee6180a76f [Fix] Prevent fields name conflicts with composite subfields names (#6713)
At field creation we are checking the availability of the name by
comparing it to the other fields' names' on the object; but for
composite fields the fields' names' as indicated in the repository do
not exactly match the column names' on the tables (e.g "createdBy" field
is actually represented by columns createdByName, createdBySource etc.).

In this PR we prevent the conflict with the standard composite fields'
names.
There is still room for errors with the custom composite fields: for
example a custom composite field "address" of type address on a custom
object "listing" will introduce the columns addressAddressStreet1,
addressAddressStreet2 etc. while we won't prevent the user from later
creating a custom field named "addressAddressStreet1".
For now I decided not to tackle this as this seem extremely edgy + would
impact performance on creation of all fields while never actually useful
(I think).
2024-08-23 13:24:10 +02:00
6cd154aac6 Forbid names above 63 characters to comply with pg identifier limit (#6095)
Fixes #6032.

Pg has a char limit on identifiers (= table, columns, enum names) of 63
bytes.
Let's limit the metadata names that will be converted to identifiers
(objects names, fields names, relation names, enum values) to 63 chars.
For the sake of simplicity in the FE we will limit the input length of
labels.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2024-07-04 15:32:42 +02:00
a15884ea0a Add exceptions for metadata modules (#6070)
Class exception for each metadata module + handler to map on graphql
error

TODO left :
- find a way to call handler on auto-resolvers nestjs query (probably
interceptors)
- discuss what should be done for pre-hooks errors
- discuss what should be done for Unauthorized exception
2024-07-01 13:49:17 +02:00
def1774bf0 [Fix] Object names should be camel cased (#5571)
as per title
2024-05-25 10:29:00 +02:00
1694e0cccd Fix missing name validation on object names at update (#5434)
## Context
as per title

## How was it tested? 
local (/metadata + in product)
2024-05-16 18:15:56 +02:00
7c3e82870c [fix] Increment cache version after object/field/relation update (#5316)
Fixes #5276.

Updates were not triggering a cache version incrementation because they
do not trigger migrations while that is where the caching version logic
was.
We have decided to move the cache incrementation logic to the services.
2024-05-07 16:30:25 +02:00
e0ece3c917 Rename types for UserMappingOptions (#5230)
Following #5210

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2024-05-01 11:46:47 +02:00
ff39ba5a15 [fix] Support non latin characters in schema names (#5063)
Fixes #4943

## How was it tested?
Local (front + /metadata)
Unit tests for utils

---------

Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
2024-04-23 13:37:29 +02:00