# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
This PR fixes hotkey escape on advanced filter dropdown, which wasn't
working.
It adds a parameters to openDropdown, because in this particular case,
the dropdown is not opened from its clickable component but from an
openDropdown, in that case it wasn't possible for openDropdown to know
which hotkey scope to take, because the hotkey scope is generally passed
in the Dropdown component props.
We might want to find a more robust solution, where a dropdown knows its
hotkey scope without having to be mounted.
---------
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
There is a problem of hotkey scope not being passed to the relation
picker used for single record select fields.
Fixed it where we open a single record select.
This PR fixes all followup that @Bonapara add on Discord.
- [x] When no group by is set, clicking on group by should open the
"field selection" menu
- [x] When closed, chevron should be "chevron-right" instead of
"chevron-up"
- [x] Sort : Add ability to switch from alphabetical to manual when
moving a option in sort alphabetical
- [x] Add subtext for group by and sort
- [x] Group by menu display bug
- [x] Changing the sort should not close the menu
- [x] Group by Activation -> shows empty state + is slow
- [x] Switching from Kanban view Settings to Table Options menu displays
an empty menu
- [x] Unnecessary spacing under groups
- [x] When no "select" are set on an object, redirect the user directly
to the new Select field page
- [x] Sort : Default should be manual
- [x] Hidding "no value" displays all options and remove the "hide empty
group" toggle
- [x] Hide Empty group option disappeared
- [x] Group by should not be persisted on "Locked/Main view" (**For now
we just disable the group by on main view**)
- [x] Hide Empty group should not be activated by default on
Opportunities Kanban view
- [ ] Animate the group opening/closing (**We'll be done later**)
Performance improvement:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd2acf66-0e56-45d0-8b2f-99c62e57d6f7https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80f1a2e1-9f77-4923-b85d-acb9cad96886
Also fix#9036
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Added a new Seeder service to help with custom object seeds
- Added RichTextFieldInput to edit a rich text field directly on the
table, but deactivated it for now.
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* Migrate record table to scope map
* Update record scope id to record id
* Remove todos and fix edit mode
* Fix perf
* Fix tests
* Fix tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
