# Introduction
This PR contains around ~+300 tests + snapshot additions
Please check both object model creation and edition
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/355
Refactored into two agnostic forms the Object Model settings page for
instance `/settings/objects/notes#settings`.
## `SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm`
Added a new abstraction `SettingsUpdateDataModelObjectAboutForm` to wrap
`SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm` in an `update` context
Schema:
```ts
const requiredFormFields = objectMetadataItemSchema.pick({
description: true,
icon: true,
labelPlural: true,
labelSingular: true,
});
const optionalFormFields = objectMetadataItemSchema
.pick({
nameSingular: true,
namePlural: true,
isLabelSyncedWithName: true,
})
.partial();
export const settingsDataModelObjectAboutFormSchema =
requiredFormFields.merge(optionalFormFields);
```
## `SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard`
Update on change
Schema:
```ts
export const settingsDataModelObjectIdentifiersFormSchema =
objectMetadataItemSchema.pick({
labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId: true,
imageIdentifierFieldMetadataId: true,
});
```
## Error management and validation schema
Improved the frontend validation form in order to attest that:
- Names are in camelCase
- Names are differents
- Names are not empty string ***SHOULD BE DONE SERVER SIDE TOO*** ( will
in a next PR, atm it literally breaks any workspace )
- Labels are differents
- Labels aren't empty strings
Hide the error messages as we need to decide what kind of styling we
want for our errors with forms
( Example with error labels )
This PR improves advanced filter code and fixes the bug that prevented
the creation of a filter group.
On the debugging side :
- Adding an advanced filter rule to create a group now works
On the refactoring side :
- We now use AdvancedFilterRecordFilterGroupChildOptionsDropdown to
clarify the code that show the option dropdown of a group.
- Refacatored useCurrentViewViewFilterGroup to
useChildRecordFiltersAndRecordFilterGroups. It is now using only
RecordFilter and RecordFilterGroup type instead of view types. It also
exports recordFilters and recordFilterGroups alone, when they are
children of a group, so we don't have to extract them from the merged
array that is typed RecordFilter | RecordFilterGroup, which is necessary
for displaying a group.
- Two typeguards have been introduced to help discern RecordFilter from
RecordFilterGroup : isRecordFilterGroupChildARecordFilterGroup and
isRecordFilterGroupChildARecordFilter, this allows to remove any typing
on child processing.
- Renaming from view to record (but there are still some left)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/491
This PR:
- Duplicates the right drawer pages for the command menu and replace all
the states used in these pages by component states (The right drawer
pages will be deleted when we deprecate the command menu v1)
- Wraps those pages into a component instance provider
- We store the component instance id upon navigation to restore the
states when we navigate back to a page
The only pages which are not updated for now are the pages related to
the workflow objects, this will be done in another PR.
In another PR, to improve the navigation experience I will replace the
icons and titles of the chips by the label identifier and the avatar if
the page is a record page.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a76d3345-01f3-4db9-8a55-331cca8b87e0
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Create a workflow version component family state for each workflow
version : `stepId` => `StepOutputSchema`
- Populate this state when reaching the workflow visualizer of the
workflow version
- Wrap the right drawer when in edit mode with the context. It is the
only one who needs this schema
Next step:
- read this state from the variables
This PR removes the legacy useGetCurrentView hook that still returned
view with combined filters and sorts, which we don't use anymore.
This allows to remove a bug where we couldn't select the "open in"
settings of a view.
**TLDR:**
Deprecate getProductPrices in the frontEnd and replace it with
BillingBaseProductPrices.
**In order to test:**
- Have the environment variable IS_BILLING_ENABLED set to true and add
the other required environment variables for Billing to work
- Do a database reset (to ensure that the new feature flag is properly
added and that the billing tables are created)
- Run the command: npx nx run twenty-server:command
billing:sync-plans-data (if you don't do that the products and prices
will not be present in the database)
- Run the server , the frontend, the worker, and the stripe listen
command (stripe listen --forward-to
http://localhost:3000/billing/webhooks)
- Buy a subscription for acme workspace the choose your plan should be
using the new front end endpoint
This PR partially fixes advanced filters that were not working even with
feature flag activated.
Bugs fixed here :
- Advanced filters are not applied
- Root advanced filters cannot be created
- Cannot close advanced filters dropdown
- Can create multiple times the same non-advanced filter (reserved for
advanced filters)
upsertRecordFilter and removeRecordFilter have been refactored to take
record filter id instead of field metadata id, because the user should
be allowed to apply multiple filters for the same field.
We now base view filter CRUD directly on id, otherwise it could lead to
inconsistencies between advanced filters and simple filters.
This PR also refactors an important hook :
computeRecordGqlOperationFilter, so that it takes an object instead of
multiple params.
There are still bugs left, they will be taken in other PRs.
## Context
ActivityTargetsInlineCell was not using the useIsFieldValueReadOnly hook
but a dedicated prop instead. To align with the rest of the
implementation I've updated that part of the code however we still want
the table/kanban views to always be in read-only mode regardless of the
hook logic so I've updated the hook to take the ContextStoreViewType
into account.
This PR implements CRUD for view filter groups with the new logic as
already done for view filters and view sorts.
It also completely removes the old combined view filter group states and
usage.
This PR is quite big but the impact is limited since it only changes
advanced filters module, which is under feature flag at the moment, and
it is already in a broken state so unusable, even if someone activates
the feature flag.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/63
This PR:
- Creates an **Import csv** action
- Allows the import of notes and tasks
- Removes the import action from the index option menu
- Adds export action when only one record is selected
- Adds see deleted record action to workflow objects
## Introduction
Added coverage on the `useDeleteOneRecord` hooks, especially its
optimistic behavior feature.
Introduced a new testing tool `InMemoryTestingCacheInstance` that has
builtin very basic expectors in order to avoid future duplication when
covering others record hooks `update, create, destroy` etc etc
## Notes
Added few comments in this PR regarding some builtin functions I've
created around companies and people mocked object model and that I think
could be cool to spread and centralize within a dedicated "class
template"
Also put in light that unless I'm mistaken some tests are running on
`RecordNode` and not `RecordObject`
Took few directions on my own that as I always I would suggestion nor
remarks on them !
Let me know
## Misc
- Should we refactor `useDeleteOneRecord` tests to follow `eachTesting`
pattern ? => I feel like this is inappropriate as this hooks is already
high level, the only plus value would be less tests code despite
readability IMO
This PR implements hooks and utils logic for handling CRUD and view
filter group comparison.
The main hook is useAreViewFilterGroupsDifferentFromRecordFilterGroups,
like view filters and view sorts.
Inside this hook we implement getViewFilterGroupsToCreate,
getViewFilterGroupsToDelete and getViewFilterGroupsToUpdate.
All of those come with their unit tests.
In this PR we also introduce a new util to prevent nasty bugs happening
when we compare undefined === null,
This util is called compareStrictlyExceptForNullAndUndefined and it
should replace every strict equality comparison between values that can
be null or undefined (which we have a lot)
This could be enforced by a custom ESLint rule, the autofix may also be
implemented (maybe the util should be put in twenty-shared ?)
This PR fixed ViewBar chips that were using margin instead of padding
and gaps.
This SortOrFilter chip was using margin left to space itself where it
was the role of the view bar to handle gap between chips and
padding-left at the beginning.
During sign-up, new users setting new workspaces are required to choose
a billing plan (30-days or 7 days). They are then redirected to
billing.twenty.com to confirm and configure their plan choice.
Then they are quickly redirected to /settings/billing before being
redirected to /create-workspace.
The problem is that even though /create-workspace is not a gated path,
/settings/billing is: it is a path gated by WORKSPACE permission which
has not been granted to the user at this stage. therefore the user is
not redirected to /create-workspace since they do not reach
/settings/billing path but is redirected to the profile page instead.
(To see this feature flag must be removed + billing enabled: you can use
this branch [from this closed
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10570)).
The chosen workaround is to bypass, in the FE, the permission check for
WORKSPACE permission if the workspace's activation status is
PENDING_CREATION. There is no need for any BE change.
This PR implements the initialization of current record filter groups
state from view.
It also implements mapRecordFilterGroupToViewFilterGroup,
mapRecordFilterGroupLogicalOperatorToViewFilterGroupLogicalOperator and
mapViewFilterGroupLogicalOperatorToRecordFilterGroupLogicalOperator with
their corresponding unit tests.
Some unused states not caught by ESLint are also removed.
