This PR is fixing the Task/Note Target picker.
## Issue
A few weeks ago, we have simplified the recordPicker logic. During this
refacto, we stopped making sure the selected records were fetched.
However, the optimistic update of the activity supposed that current
activityTargets are present in the selection in the picker in order to
filter out the removed items.
## Fix
In case we don't find the record in the picker selection, we don't
filter it out (it means the user cannot have removed it)
## Next step
@ijreilly I think we should put it back, as the selected records do not
appear on top anymore
- Rename all parts using the name "relation" to "record" when component
is only selecting record
- Remove the use of scope states in folder
- Rename entities to records
This PR prepares the use of the record picker in workflows
Fixes#4692
This is not the most beautiful fix (I think the right fix is to add 1px
somewhere), but this issue is old and deserved to be closed quickly
without spending too much time as this will likely be refactored and is
not very important
Fixes: #8487#5027
1. Summary
The purpose of these changes is to elevate the dev/user experience when
the initial config load call fails for whatever reason by displaying a
fallback component.
2. Solution
I ended up making more changes than I initially planned. I had to update
the order of the contexts a bit because `GenericErrorFallback` is
dependent on `AppThemeProvider` for styling and `AppThemeProvider` is
dependent on `ObjectMetadataItemsProvider` for
[`useObjectMetadataItem`](ae2f193d68/packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-metadata/hooks/useObjectMetadataItem.ts (L22))
hook (`AppThemeProvider` -> `useColorScheme` -> `useUpdateOneRecord` ->
`useObjectMetadataItem`). I had to create a wrapper component for
`AppThemeProvider` and stylize it in a way that it looks responsive on
both mobile and desktop devices. Finally, I had to introduce the
`isErrored` flag to differentiate the loading and error states.
There are some improvements we can make later -
- Display a loading state for the initial config load
- Implement a refetch logic for the initial config loading failure
3. Recording
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c2f43573-8006-4118-8e18-8576099d78fdhttps://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c5853d3-539b-4880-aa38-c416c3e13594
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
FIX: #6977
Implementation:
1. Parent (Summary componenet) width is set to 100%. (dosen't grow even
if the child exceeds width)
2. span element is set to `text-overflow: ellipses` when overflown.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-7536](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-7536).
---
### Description
Migrate all menu items components to twenty ui and update imports.
```typescript
MenuItem
MenuItemAvata
MenuItemCommand
MenuItemCommandHotKeys
MenuItemDraggable
MenuItemMultiSelect
MenuItemMultiSelectAvatar
MenuItemMultiSelectTag
MenuItemNavigate
MenuItemSelect
MenuItemSelectAvatar
MenuItemSelectColor
MenuItemSelectTag
MenuItemSuggestion
MenuItemToggle
```
\
Also migrate all other dependent components and utilities like
`Checkbox` & `Toggle`\
\
Fixestwentyhq/private-issues#82
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Simplifying the logic around multi-object pickers and search by getting
rid of the behaviour that keeped selected elements even when they did
not match the search filter (eg keeping selected record "Brian Chesky"
in dropdown even when search input is "Qonto"). This allows us to
simplify the fetch queries around the search to only do one query.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
### Description
- This PR has as the base branch the TWNTY-5491 branch, but we also had
to include updates from the main branch, and currently, there are
conflicts in the TWNTY-5491, that cause errors on typescript in this PR,
so, we can update once the conflicts are resolved on the base branch,
but the functionality can be reviewed anyway
- We Implemented a new layout of object details settings and new, the
data is auto-saved in `Settings `tab of object detail
- There is no indication to the user that data are saved automatically
in the design, currently we are disabling the form
### Demo\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4198c0aa54b5450780a570ceee574838?sid=b4ef0a42-2d41-435f-9f5f-1b16816939f7>
### Refs
#TWNTY-5491
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Reusing the useUploadAttachment Hook
In the implementation of the feature to ensure the attachment table is
updated whenever new images are added to a RICH_TEXT field #7617 , it is
likely that the useUploadAttachment hook is reused.
The useUploadAttachment hook is responsible for handling the upload of
attachments, including images, and returning the uploaded file URL. By
reusing this hook, you can leverage its existing functionality to handle
image uploads within the RICH_TEXT field.
In this case, the modified image handling logic would utilize the
useUploadAttachment hook to upload new images added to the RICH_TEXT
content. The hook would then return the uploaded file URL, which would
be used to update the attachment table with the details of the newly
added images.
By reusing the useUploadAttachment hook, you can avoid duplicating code
and ensure consistency in the way attachments are handled throughout the
application.
Fixes#6565
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
[This PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8210) introduced a
regression, causing noteId or taskId (respectively for noteTarget or
taskTarget creation) to be overwritten with an undefined value in the
input for noteTarget or taskTarget creation.
This is because in ActivityTargetInlineCellEditMode, in addition to the
noteId and taskId we are declaring, we are looking into the object
(noteTarget or taskTarget)'s fields and prefilling the record-to-create
with a value, potentially undefined, for all of the object fields.
So when looping over noteTarget's fields, we would find the `note`
relation field, and eventually add `note: undefined` to the
record-to-create input, in addition to the non-empty and valid existing
`noteId`.
Then in sanitizeRecordInput, from the note added right above, we add an
empty noteId to the input from node, overwriting the "good" noteId.
There are several ways to fix this, I chose to update prefillRecord not
to add an empty "note" object that makes no sense in addition to the
"noteId" we already have at this stage.
It is also possible to update `sanitizeRecordInput` not to overwrite a
value from a relation (noteId from note relation) if there is already a
value in the input.
@ehconitin following your question I did a quick refactoring of the show
page - we can push it much further but it would be better to start from
this code than from main
Edit: I will merge to avoid conflicts, this is very far from perfect but
still much better than the mess we had before
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fixed bug that was appearing with records without any activity target
The problem may come from the new TwentyORM that doesn't understand the
filter like before.
This PR Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6942
Other improvements :
- Fetch activities (note and task) title only when loading timeline, so
we don't always have a clickable title.
- Fixed IconButton width regression.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR Solves #6830
## Issue Summary
The tasks are grouped by their respective statuses and displayed on the
ui. The grouping is performed by `lodash.groupBy` which doesn't maintain
explicit ordering of the keys.
## Fix
Sort the tasks groups array by their status on the basis of
reverse-alphabetical order before generating task component for each
task data.
#### Why reverse alphabetical?
It implicitly sorts the statuses as per the order `TODO` ->
`IN_PROGRESS` -> `DONE`
Caveats:
1. Changing the name of one or more status might result in a different
unwanted order.
2. `null` is unhandled, although the original code doesn't allow for
nulls as status while displaying
### Alternative Fix
Maintain an explicit ordering of the statuses and sort the tasks
accordingly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
