Workflow version statuses are too complex to handle in cache. You always
need to:
- modify entity in cache
- modify queries in cache
- do the same for all other version statuses that should also be updated
This complex behavior leads to bugs because of a cache wrongly updated.
Let's simply do a refetch versions on status update.
**This PR implements a new layout for the visualizer, but the dimensions
of the nodes will change soon. I used hard-coded dimensions, like
`40px`, but I'll update them when I work on fixing the nodes' design. I
think we can merge this PR first and then fix the nodes' design.**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/580fa812-ee8e-4452-b6ac-ca55ecb31759
- remove delete serverless function when archiving workflow version
- update copy serverless function to reset serverless function to old
version
- remove createNewWorkflowVersion and use createDraftFromWorkflowVersion
- fix step update issue and optimistic rendering when generate draft
from active version
In this PR:
- removing rootDir / baseUrl from any tsconfig.json
- we need to keep it in tsconfig.spec.json and also specify rootDir in
jest.config.ts moduleMapper because of the way nx jest executor works
(automatically moving back to root)
- we need to explictly specify the depencies to twenty-shared /
twenty-emails (built packages) in packages package.json to help nx
understand dependencies
- Clean Playwright's configuration:
- Remove artificial 500ms delay between each step
- Group all tests under a `chrome` project relying on a `setup` project
to get an authentication state which all tests can reuse
- Changes on the `Sign up with invite link via email` test:
- Generate a new email for each test trial, as previously it was failing
when run many times
- Make deleting the account part of the test; if we write other tests
for account sign-up, we'll prefer to delete the accounts with an HTTP
call to speed up things
- Added some assertions to ensure we reached steps when expected, as we
removed the 500ms delay between each step, and it made some assertions
fail
- Wrote new tests for workflows:
- Created `Create workflow`, a test asserting we can create a workflow
from the record table
- Created `Create simple workflow`, a test asserting we can create a
simple flow; I will add more assertions to this test and write other
tests once this first PR is approved
- I make HTTP calls to delete and destroy workflows after they run to
keep the database clean
- Added a data-testid to ensure we focus elements from the Cmd+K; our
selectors are not strong – see `getByRole('textbox')` – and I preferred
to scope them to a root element
- Added an `aria-label` to a button
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
We were using metadata client by legacy. Architecture is not great for
Core engine: workflows are available both in data and metadata client.
It makes more sense to use the data client since workflows are part of
standard objects
After hitting use as draft, we redirect the user to the workflow page.
If the user already accessed that page, the workflow and its current
version will be stored in cache. So we also need to update that cache.
I tried to update it manually but it was more complex than expected.
Steps and trigger are not fully defined objects.
I ended with a simple refetch query that I wanted to avoid but that is
at least fully working with minimum logic.
There are many fields so I will cut my work in several small PRs.
Here, I updated the following fields:
- [x] `FormBooleanFieldInput`
- [x] `FormCurrencyFieldInput`
- [x] `FormNumberFieldInput`
- [x] `FormDateFieldInput`
- [x] `FormDateTimeFieldInput`
- [x] `FormMultiSelectFieldInput`
- [x] `FormSelectFieldInput`
The updates in the components are relatively small. I wrote Storybook
tests, and this is why the PR is quite big.
The changes in the components should mostly the same.
I added a disabled state to some inputs.
I created a specialized `VariableChip` as its styles started diverging
from the original `SortOrFilterChip`.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/52
- contrary to title, we do not remove serverless functions on workflow
version archivation because serverless fucntion might be used in another
workflow version
- we fix the serverless funciton version displayed in the code step
- we allow test function version in step display right drawer
- we delete serverless function only when serverless function has no
published version
When a workflow was activate, the previous activated version was still
available in cmd+k
This is because we were only updating entities in cache after
activation.
We also need to update the queries stored in cache, because this is
where the cmd+k look to know which workflow is active.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/750cc24a-7583-4641-856c-0f9892d26331
When switching between the same step detail component, even if the props
is updated, component is not re-created.
This is an issue since form fields often keep an internal state. Which
means that even if form data are updated, the displayed value may still
be the value of the previous step detail.
Adding a key to for re-creation.
