Proposal:
- Add a method in ActiveWorkspaceCommand to loop over workspace safely
(add counter, add try / catch, provide datasource with fresh cache,
destroy datasource => as we do always do it)
Also in this PR:
- make sure we clear all dataSources (and not only the one on metadata
version in RAM)
We had to remove soft-deletion on default filters due to the missing
indexes. We now generate composite indexes with the foreign key
containing the deletedAt column as well which should improve
performances
Looks like insert() does not return foreign keys. We could eventually
call findMany after but it seems that's what save() is doing so I'm
replacing insert with save.
```typescript
/**
* Flag to determine whether the entity that is being persisted
* should be reloaded during the persistence operation.
*
* It will work only on databases which does not support RETURNING / OUTPUT statement.
* Enabled by default.
*/
reload?: boolean;
```
Note: save() also does an upsert by default with no way to configure
that so if we want to keep that behaviour we will need to add a check
before
```typescript
if (args.upsert) {
const existingRecords = await repository.findBy({
id: Any(args.data.map((record) => record.id)),
});
...
```
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- avoid failing when missing cache (used for command)
- remove unused load cache function. Cache will be always re-created
when trying to fetch if not existing
## Context
We currently have a race condition when dealing with datasource
creation. This happen when multiple queries arrive at the same time (for
example graphql dataloaders) and the datasource is not created yet.
Since the datasource is stored in memory this can happen more often as
well and they were all triggering the datasource creation at the same
time.
I'm trying to fix the issue with promise memoization. Now, instead of
caching the datasource only, we also want to cache the promise of the
datasource creation and make the creation itself synchronous.
More info about promise memoization in this article for example:
https://www.jonmellman.com/posts/promise-memoization
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
In this PR:
- removing ugprade-0.24 commands as we are releasing 0.30
- introducing cache:flush command
- refactoring upgrade command and sync-metadata command to use the
ActiveWorkspacesCommand so they consistently run on all workspaces or
selected workspaces
Fixes:
- clear localStorage on sign out
- fix missing workspaceMember in verify resolver
- do not throw on datasource already destroyed exception which can
happen with race condition when several resolvers are resolving in
parallel
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
This PR introduces the following changes:
- add the metadataVersion to all our metadata cache keys to ease
troubleshooting:
<img width="1146" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8427805b-e07f-465e-9e69-1403652c8b12">
- introduce a cache recompute lock to avoid overloading the database to
recompute the cache many time
## Context
The goal is to replace pg_graphql with our own ORM wrapper (TwentyORM).
This PR tries to add some parsing logic to convert graphql requests to
send to the ORM to replace pg_graphql implementation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
At field creation we are checking the availability of the name by
comparing it to the other fields' names' on the object; but for
composite fields the fields' names' as indicated in the repository do
not exactly match the column names' on the tables (e.g "createdBy" field
is actually represented by columns createdByName, createdBySource etc.).
In this PR we prevent the conflict with the standard composite fields'
names.
There is still room for errors with the custom composite fields: for
example a custom composite field "address" of type address on a custom
object "listing" will introduce the columns addressAddressStreet1,
addressAddressStreet2 etc. while we won't prevent the user from later
creating a custom field named "addressAddressStreet1".
For now I decided not to tackle this as this seem extremely edgy + would
impact performance on creation of all fields while never actually useful
(I think).
We have found the root cause of the issue:
- when using a datasource (including the cached ones), we are fetching
ObjectMetadataCollection from cache (700kB). Datasource usage is
happening any time we are using twentyORM, which is everywhere in the
jobs and in some resolvers (including the GetCurrentUser one). This is
leading to a high load on redis and leading to the performance issues we
are seeing.
- we actually don't need to fetch this objectMetadataCollection while
using a cached datasource, only when we instantiate a new one
## Context
As we grow, the messaging scripts are experiencing performance issues
forcing us to temporarily disable them on the cloud.
While investigating the performance, I have noticed that generating the
entity schema (for twentyORM) in the repository is taking ~500ms locally
on my Mac M2 so likely more on pods. Caching the entitySchema then!
I'm also clarifying naming around schemaVersion and cacheVersions ==>
both are renamed workspaceMetadataVersion and migrated to the workspace
table (the workspaceCacheVersion table is dropped).
Implement soft delete on standards and custom objects.
This is a temporary solution, when we drop `pg_graphql` we should rely
on the `softDelete` functions of TypeORM.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Calling `getObjectMetadata` from `WorkspaceCacheStorageService` in every
query was causing big performance issues. The `objectMetadataCollection`
is now part of the `WorkspaceInternalContext` so we only instance it
once in the `WorkspaceDatasourceFactory`.
Queries are now much faster, for instance for TimelineCalendar, it went
from ~450ms to 80ms.
In this PR:
- adding Favorites to Tasks and Notes
- fixing inconsistencies between custom object creation and sync of
standard fields of custom objects
- fixing workspaceCacheVersion not used to invalidate existing
datasource
This pull request introduces a new `FieldMetadataType` called `ACTOR`.
The primary objective of this new type is to add an extra column to the
following objects: `person`, `company`, `opportunity`, `note`, `task`,
and all custom objects.
This composite type contains three properties:
- `source`
```typescript
export enum FieldActorSource {
EMAIL = 'EMAIL',
CALENDAR = 'CALENDAR',
API = 'API',
IMPORT = 'IMPORT',
MANUAL = 'MANUAL',
}
```
- `workspaceMemberId`
- This property can be `undefined` in some cases and refers to the
member who created the record.
- `name`
- Serves as a fallback if the `workspaceMember` is deleted and is used
for other source types like `API`.
### Functionality
The pre-hook system has been updated to allow real-time argument
updates. When a record is created, a pre-hook can now compute and update
the arguments accordingly. This enhancement enables the `createdBy`
field to be populated with the correct values based on the
`authContext`.
The `authContext` now includes:
- An optional User entity
- An optional ApiKey entity
- The workspace entity
This provides access to the necessary data for the `createdBy` field.
In the GraphQL API, only the `source` can be specified in the
`createdBy` input. This allows the front-end to specify the source when
creating records from a CSV file.
### Front-End Handling
On the front-end, `orderBy` and `filter` are only applied to the name
property of the `ACTOR` composite type. Currently, we are unable to
apply these operations to the workspace member relation. This means that
if a workspace member changes their first name or last name, there may
be a mismatch because the name will differ from the new one. The name
displayed on the screen is based on the workspace member entity when
available.
### Missing Components
Currently, this PR does not include a `createdBy` value for the `MAIL`
and `CALENDAR` sources. These records are created in a job, and at
present, we only have access to the workspaceId within the job. To
address this, we should use a function similar to
`loadServiceWithContext`, which was recently removed from `TwentyORM`.
This function would allow us to pass the `authContext` to the jobs
without disrupting existing jobs.
Another PR will be created to handle these cases.
### Related Issues
Fixes issue #5155.
### Additional Notes
This PR doesn't include the migrations of the current records and views.
Everything works properly when the database is reset but this part is
still missing for now. We'll add that in another PR.
- There is a minor issue: front-end tests are broken since this commit:
[80c0fc7ff1).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR refactors the ORM-Manager to simplify and unify the datasource
creation. I'm deprecating all usages if InjectWorkspaceDatasource and
InjectWorkspaceRepository as we can't be sure they are up-to-date
This PR fixes a few bugs on TwentyORM:
- fix many to one relations that were not properly queries
- fix many to one relations that were not properly parsed
- compute datasource (or use from cache) at run-time and do not use
injected one that could be outdated
We still need to refactor it to simplify, I feel the API are too complex
and we have too many cache layers. Also the relation computation part is
very complex and bug prone
### Overview
This PR builds upon #5153, adding the ability to get a repository for
custom objects. The `entitySchema` is now generated for both standard
and custom objects based on metadata stored in the database instead of
the decorated `WorkspaceEntity` in the code. This change ensures that
standard objects with custom fields and relations can also support
custom objects.
### Implementation Details
#### Key Changes:
- **Dynamic Schema Generation:** The `entitySchema` for standard and
custom objects is now dynamically generated from the metadata stored in
the database. This shift allows for greater flexibility and
adaptability, particularly for standard objects with custom fields and
relations.
- **Custom Object Repository Retrieval:** A repository for a custom
object can be retrieved using `TwentyORMManager` based on the object's
name. Here's an example of how this can be achieved:
```typescript
const repository = await this.twentyORMManager.getRepository('custom');
/*
* `repository` variable will be typed as follows, ensuring that standard
fields and relations are properly typed:
* const repository: WorkspaceRepository<CustomWorkspaceEntity & {
* [key: string]: any;
* }>
*/
const res = await repository.find({});
```
Fix#6179
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR introduce a new decorator named `@WorkspaceJoinColumn`, the goal
of this one is to manually declare the join columns inside the workspace
entities, so we don't have to rely on `ObjectRecord` type.
This decorator can be used that way:
```typescript
@WorkspaceRelation({
standardId: ACTIVITY_TARGET_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.company,
type: RelationMetadataType.MANY_TO_ONE,
label: 'Company',
description: 'ActivityTarget company',
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
inverseSideTarget: () => CompanyWorkspaceEntity,
inverseSideFieldKey: 'activityTargets',
})
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
company: Relation<CompanyWorkspaceEntity> | null;
// The argument is the name of the relation above
@WorkspaceJoinColumn('company')
companyId: string | null;
```
#### Overview
This PR introduces a new API for dynamically registering and executing
pre and post query hooks in the Workspace Query Hook system using the
`@WorkspaceQueryHook` decorator. This approach eliminates the need for
manual provider registration, and fix the issue of `undefined` or `null`
repository using `@InjectWorkspaceRepository`.
#### New API
**Define a Hook**
Use the `@WorkspaceQueryHook` decorator to define pre or post hooks:
```typescript
@WorkspaceQueryHook({
key: `calendarEvent.findMany`,
scope: Scope.REQUEST,
})
export class CalendarEventFindManyPreQueryHook implements WorkspaceQueryHookInstance {
async execute(userId: string, workspaceId: string, payload: FindManyResolverArgs): Promise<void> {
if (!payload?.filter?.id?.eq) {
throw new BadRequestException('id filter is required');
}
// Implement hook logic here
}
}
```
This API simplifies the registration and execution of query hooks,
providing a more flexible and maintainable approach.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR is replacing and removing all the raw queries and repositories
with the new `TwentyORM` and injection system using
`@InjectWorkspaceRepository`.
Some logic that was contained inside repositories has been moved to the
services.
In this PR we're only replacing repositories for calendar feature.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
### Overview
This PR introduces significant enhancements to the MessageQueue module
by integrating `@Processor`, `@Process`, and `@InjectMessageQueue`
decorators. These changes streamline the process of defining and
managing queue processors and job handlers, and also allow for
request-scoped handlers, improving compatibility with services that rely
on scoped providers like TwentyORM repositories.
### Key Features
1. **Decorator-based Job Handling**: Use `@Processor` and `@Process`
decorators to define job handlers declaratively.
2. **Request Scope Support**: Job handlers can be scoped per request,
enhancing integration with request-scoped services.
### Usage
#### Defining Processors and Job Handlers
The `@Processor` decorator is used to define a class that processes jobs
for a specific queue. The `@Process` decorator is applied to methods
within this class to define specific job handlers.
##### Example 1: Specific Job Handlers
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('taskQueue')
export class TaskProcessor {
@Process('taskA')
async handleTaskA(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task A with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task A
}
@Process('taskB')
async handleTaskB(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task B with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task B
}
}
```
In the example above, `TaskProcessor` is responsible for processing jobs
in the `taskQueue`. The `handleTaskA` method will only be called for
jobs with the name `taskA`, while `handleTaskB` will be called for
`taskB` jobs.
##### Example 2: General Job Handler
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('generalQueue')
export class GeneralProcessor {
@Process()
async handleAnyJob(job: { id: string, name: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling job ${job.name} with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for any job
}
}
```
In this example, `GeneralProcessor` handles all jobs in the
`generalQueue`, regardless of the job name. The `handleAnyJob` method
will be invoked for every job added to the `generalQueue`.
#### Adding Jobs to a Queue
You can use the `@InjectMessageQueue` decorator to inject a queue into a
service and add jobs to it.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';
import { InjectMessageQueue, MessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Injectable()
export class TaskService {
constructor(
@InjectMessageQueue('taskQueue') private readonly taskQueue: MessageQueue,
) {}
async addTaskA(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskA', data);
}
async addTaskB(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskB', data);
}
}
```
In this example, `TaskService` adds jobs to the `taskQueue`. The
`addTaskA` and `addTaskB` methods add jobs named `taskA` and `taskB`,
respectively, to the queue.
#### Using Scoped Job Handlers
To utilize request-scoped job handlers, specify the scope in the
`@Processor` decorator. This is particularly useful for services that
use scoped repositories like those in TwentyORM.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue, Scope } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor({ name: 'scopedQueue', scope: Scope.REQUEST })
export class ScopedTaskProcessor {
@Process('scopedTask')
async handleScopedTask(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling scoped task with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for scoped task, which might use request-scoped services
}
}
```
Here, the `ScopedTaskProcessor` is associated with `scopedQueue` and
operates with request scope. This setup is essential when the job
handler relies on services that need to be instantiated per request,
such as scoped repositories.
### Migration Notes
- **Decorators**: Refactor job handlers to use `@Processor` and
`@Process` decorators.
- **Request Scope**: Utilize the scope option in `@Processor` if your
job handlers depend on request-scoped services.
Fix#5628
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR is updating all object metadata entities with the new
decorators, and deleting the old ones.
This way we can use the new TwentyORM with all the standard objects.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR is a follow up of PR #5153.
This one introduce some changes on how we're querying composite fields.
We can do:
```typescript
export class CompanyService {
constructor(
@InjectWorkspaceRepository(CompanyObjectMetadata)
private readonly companyObjectMetadataRepository: WorkspaceRepository<CompanyObjectMetadata>,
) {}
async companies(): Promise<CompanyObjectMetadata[]> {
// Old way
// const companiesFilteredByLinkLabel = await this.companyObjectMetadataRepository.find({
// where: { xLinkLabel: 'MyLabel' },
// });
// Result will return xLinkLabel property
// New way
const companiesFilteredByLinkLabel = await this.companyObjectMetadataRepository.find({
where: { xLink: { label: 'MyLabel' } },
});
// Result will return { xLink: { label: 'MyLabel' } } property instead of { xLinkLabel: 'MyLabel' }
return companiesFilteredByLinkLabel;
}
}
```
Also we can now inject `TwentyORMManage` class to manually create a
repository based on a given `workspaceId` using
`getRepositoryForWorkspace` function that way:
```typescript
export class CompanyService {
constructor(
// TwentyORMModule should be initialized
private readonly twentyORMManager,
) {}
async companies(): Promise<CompanyObjectMetadata[]> {
const repository = await this.twentyORMManager.getRepositoryForWorkspace(
'8bb6e872-a71f-4341-82b5-6b56fa81cd77',
CompanyObjectMetadata,
);
const companies = await repository.find();
return companies;
}
}
```
## Introduction
This PR introduces "TwentyORM," a custom ORM module designed to
streamline database interactions within our workspace schema, reducing
the need for raw SQL queries. The API mirrors TypeORM's to provide a
familiar interface while integrating enhancements specific to our
project's needs.
To facilitate this integration, new decorators prefixed with `Workspace`
have been implemented. These decorators are used to define entity
metadata more explicitly and are critical in constructing our schema
dynamically.
## New Features
- **Custom ORM System**: Named "TwentyORM," which aligns closely with
TypeORM for ease of use but is tailored to our application's specific
requirements.
- **Decorator-Driven Configuration**: Entities are now configured with
`Workspace`-prefixed decorators that clearly define schema mappings and
relationships directly within the entity classes.
- **Injectable Repositories**: Repositories can be injected similarly to
TypeORM, allowing for flexible and straightforward data management.
## Example Implementations
### Decorated Entity Definitions
Entities are defined with new decorators that outline table and field
metadata, relationships, and constraints. Here are examples of these
implementations:
#### Company Metadata Object
```typescript
@WorkspaceObject({
standardId: STANDARD_OBJECT_IDS.company,
namePlural: 'companies',
labelSingular: 'Company',
labelPlural: 'Companies',
description: 'A company',
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
})
export class CompanyObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
@WorkspaceField({
standardId: COMPANY_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.name,
type: FieldMetadataType.TEXT,
label: 'Name',
description: 'The company name',
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
})
name: string;
@WorkspaceField({
standardId: COMPANY_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.xLink,
type: FieldMetadataType.LINK,
label: 'X',
description: 'The company Twitter/X account',
icon: 'IconBrandX',
})
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
xLink: LinkMetadata;
@WorkspaceField({
standardId: COMPANY_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.position,
type: FieldMetadataType.POSITION,
label: 'Position',
description: 'Company record position',
icon: 'IconHierarchy2',
})
@WorkspaceIsSystem()
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
position: number;
@WorkspaceRelation({
standardId: COMPANY_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.accountOwner,
label: 'Account Owner',
description: 'Your team member responsible for managing the company account',
type: RelationMetadataType.MANY_TO_ONE,
inverseSideTarget: () => WorkspaceMemberObjectMetadata,
inverseSideFieldKey: 'accountOwnerForCompanies',
onDelete: RelationOnDeleteAction.SET_NULL,
})
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
accountOwner: WorkspaceMemberObjectMetadata;
}
```
#### Workspace Member Metadata Object
```typescript
@WorkspaceObject({
standardId: STANDARD_OBJECT_IDS.workspaceMember,
namePlural: 'workspaceMembers',
labelSingular: 'Workspace Member',
labelPlural: 'Workspace Members',
description: 'A workspace member',
icon: 'IconUserCircle',
})
@WorkspaceIsSystem()
@WorkspaceIsNotAuditLogged()
export class WorkspaceMemberObjectMetadata extends BaseObjectMetadata {
@WorkspaceField({
standardId: WORKSPACE_MEMBER_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.name,
type: FieldMetadataType.FULL_NAME,
label: 'Name',
description: 'Workspace member name',
icon: 'IconCircleUser',
})
name: FullNameMetadata;
@WorkspaceRelation({
standardId: WORKSPACE_MEMBER_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.accountOwnerForCompanies,
label: 'Account Owner For Companies',
description: 'Account owner for companies',
icon: 'IconBriefcase',
type: RelationMetadataType.ONE_TO_MANY,
inverseSideTarget: () => CompanyObjectMetadata,
inverseSideFieldKey: 'accountOwner',
onDelete: RelationOnDeleteAction.SET_NULL,
})
accountOwnerForCompanies: Relation
<CompanyObjectMetadata[]>;
}
```
### Injectable Repository Usage
Repositories can be directly injected into services, allowing for
streamlined query operations:
```typescript
export class CompanyService {
constructor(
@InjectWorkspaceRepository(CompanyObjectMetadata)
private readonly companyObjectMetadataRepository: WorkspaceRepository<CompanyObjectMetadata>,
) {}
async companies(): Promise<CompanyObjectMetadata[]> {
// Example queries demonstrating simple and relation-loaded operations
const simpleCompanies = await this.companyObjectMetadataRepository.find({});
const companiesWithOwners = await this.companyObjectMetadataRepository.find({
relations: ['accountOwner'],
});
const companiesFilteredByLinkLabel = await this.companyObjectMetadataRepository.find({
where: { xLinkLabel: 'MyLabel' },
});
return companiesFilteredByLinkLabel;
}
}
```
## Conclusions
This PR sets the foundation for a decorator-driven ORM layer that
simplifies data interactions and supports complex entity relationships
while maintaining clean and manageable code architecture. This is not
finished yet, and should be extended.
All the standard objects needs to be migrated and all the module using
the old decorators too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
