If permissionsV2 feature flag is toggled, we should recompute the
permissions.
We decided to make each WorkspaceXxCacheService Xx-specific (feature
flag, permissions...), so we are not recomputing permission cache from
workspaceFeatureFlagCacheService where feature flags are recomputed,
even if that would be a lower level than FeatureFlagService. This allows
to avoid complex circuclar dependency and keeps a clear purpose for each
service.
In this PR
1. fix workflow step creation by adding forgotten
`shouldBypassPermissionChecks` in WorkflowVersionStepWorkspaceService
2. clarify the rule for twentyORMGlobalManager: do not add unnecessary
`shouldBypassPermissionChecks` for system objects (there are no
object-records permission checks on system objects, they are dealt with
at resolver level)
In this PR
- Determine object record permissions on workflows objects (workflow,
workflowVersion, workflowRun) base on settings permissions @Weiko
- Add Workflow permission guards on workflow resolvers @thomtrp . **Any
method within a resolver that has the SettingsPermission Guard is only
callable by a apiKey or a user that has the permission** (so not by
external parties).
- Add checks bypass in workflow services since 1) for actions gated by
settings permissions, the gate should be done at resolver level, so it
will have been done before the call to the service 2) some service
methods may be called by workflowTriggerController which is callable by
external parties without permissions (ex:
workflowCommonWorkspaceService.getWorkflowVersionOrFail). This is
something we may want to change in the future (still to discuss), by
removing the guard at resolver-level and relying on
shouldBypassPermissionChecks at getRepository and made in a way that we
only bypass for external parties.
- Add checks bypass for actions performed by workflows since they should
not be restricted in our current vision
- Add tests
# Fix cursor-based pagination with lexicographic ordering for composite
fields
## Bug
The existing cursor-based pagination implementation had a bug when
handling composite fields.
When paginating through results sorted by composite fields (like
`fullName` with sub-properties `firstName` and`lastName`), the WHERE
conditions generated for cursor positioning were incorrect, leading to
records being skipped.
The previous implementation was generating wrong WHERE conditions:
For example, when paginating with a cursor like `{ firstName: 'John',
lastName: 'Doe' }`, it would generate:
```sql
WHERE firstName > 'John' AND lastName > 'Doe'
```
This is incorrect because it would miss records like `{ firstName:
'John', lastName: 'Smith' }` which should be included in forward
pagination.
## Fix
Create a new util to use proper lexicographic order when sorting a
composite field.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR
1. Add missing override of insert() method on
WorkspaceSelectQueryBuilder to return our custom
WorkspaceInsertQueryBuilder with permission checks.
2. Replace override implementation of methods on WorkspaceEntityManager
that call createQueryBuilder at a nested internal layer of typeORM (i.e.
not directly in the initial implementation of EntityManager - unlike
findBy for instance -, but in calls done under the hood at a level which
would force us to override entire other classes to pass on our
permissionOptions. It is the case for methods which call typeORM's
EntityPersistExecutor for instance.), to validate permissions and then
allow the subsequent calls to be made without permission checks
3. adapt tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
In this PR
1. adding tests on relations and nested relations to make sure that if
any permission is missing, the query fails
2. adding tests on objectRecord permissions to make sure that
permissions granted or restricted by objectPermissions take precedence
on the role's allObjectRecords permissions
Was looking into the Twenty ORM files and caught a camelCase typo which
is `workspaceEntityOrobjectMetadataName` to
`workspaceEntityOrObjectMetadataName` in two files
1. twenty-orm.manager.ts
2. twenty-orm-global.manager.ts
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
We must separate the concept of hydratation which happens at the request
level (take the token and pass auth/user context), from the concept of
authorization which happens at the query/endpoint/mutation level.
Previously, hydratation exemption happened at the operation name level
which is not correct because the operation name is meaningless and
optional. Still this gave an impression of security by enforcing a
blacklist. So in this PR we introduce linting rule that aim to achieve a
similar behavior, now every api method has to have a guard. That way if
and endpoint is not protected by AuthUserGuard or AuthWorspaceGuard,
then it has to be stated explicitly next to its code.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
BlocknoteJS requires an ESM module where our server is CJS, this forced
us to pin the server-util version, which led us to force the resolution
of several packages, leading to bugs downstream.
From Node 22.12 Node supports requiring ESM modules (available from Node
22.0 with a flag). So I upgrade the module.
I picked Node 22 and not Node 23 or Node 24 because 22 is the LTS and we
don't plan to change node versions frequently.
If you remain on Node 18, things should still mostly work, except if you
edit a Rich Text field.
I also starting changing the default runtime for Serverless Functions
which isn't directly related. This means new serverless functions will
be created on Node 22, but we will still need another PR to migrate
existing serverless functions before September (end of support by AWS).
(In this PR I also remove the upgrade commands from 0.43 since they rely
on Blocknote and I didn't want to have to deal with this)
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
First PR to add filters to send records. Lot of work left, but I want to
split. I mainly want to validate the architecture there.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/63375a75-ba88-49df-8c12-5e3e58de5342
TODO in next PRs:
- fix design
- make filters reliable. Some composite fields are not implemented and
some fields like datetime do not work well
- improve typing
# Indexes
### TLDR:
Putting indexes back, except relation ones
### Details:
- Added index synchronization logic back (it was removed previously in
45d4845b26)
in the sync-metadata service.
- for unique inedexes, a command will create unicity again by handling
duplicates that were cretated since the
45d4845b26
was triggered
# Integration test failing
- fix the local run by renaming folder in the jest configuration.
Otherwise "clickhouse" tests were failing
- falsy test introduced 2 days ago in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12271/files
# Improved participant matching with additional emails support
Closes#8991
This PR extends the participant matching system to support additional
emails in addition to primary emails for both calendar events and
messages. Previously, the system only matched participants based on
primary emails, missing matches with secondary email addresses.
- Contact creation now consider both primary and additional emails when
checking for existing contacts
- Calendar and message participant listeners now handle both primary and
additional email changes
- Added tests
## To test this PR:
Check that:
- Primary emails take precedence over additional emails in matching
- Case-insensitive email comparisons work correctly
- A contact is not created if a person already exists with the email as
its additional email
- Event listeners handle both creation and update scenarios
- Matching and unmatching logic works for complex email change scenarios
- When unmatching after a change in a primary or secondary email, events
and messages should be rematched if another person has this email as its
primary or secondary email.
---------
Co-authored-by: guillim <guigloo@msn.com>
I believe that some emails with invalid characters are breaking the sync
process.
this PR attempts to create a "safeParseAddress" function. Hopefully this
will change current behavior of a single email breaking the entire sync
process to the sync process "skipping" an invalid email address and
continuing on.
I opened this because of issues explained in #12336
---------
Co-authored-by: guillim <guigloo@msn.com>
- Fix: AvatarURL signedPath for workspace members were not consistent
when queried multiple times and it was causing the frontend to wrongly
interpret this as a change in the deepEqual condition
- Use SaveAndCancel button to be consistent with data model page
- When applying all object permission changes, a "smarter" logic applies
and removes all permissions if read is unchecked for example
- Hide settings permissions when Settings All Access is toggled
In the frame of https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/924
- Rename dataSource -> workspaceDataSource when relevant to ease
understandability
- override workspaceDataSource.createQueryBuilder, because we don't want
developers to use it directly since it does not run permission checks at
this level. Indeed, we cannot do so because 1) datasources are shared
between roles so we would need to re-think its implementation to make
that possible, while for now we never call
workspaceDatasource.createQueryBuilder in our codebase 2)
workspaceEntityManager.createQueryBuilder, that we have overriden with
permission checks, then performs a call to
workspaceDataSource.createQueryBuilder so that would make two permission
checks.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/605
Actually settingsPermissions checks were already implemented, but we had
no tests on them.
In the ticket we had mentioned
_TO DO: in pemissions.service we should stop calling
userRoleService.getRolesByUserWorkspaces and call
getRoleIdForUserWorkspace instead which relies on the cache._
But actually roleId is not enough for settings permissions because we
don't store them in the cache (unlien object records permissions - which
I think we had forgotten about when adding that TODO.), so we will still
need to make a db call to load the role's settingsPermissions. I think
it's better to make just one db call to get the role and
settingsPermissions from userWorkspaceId (as currently) than to make one
redis call to get roleId for userWorksapce then one db call to get role
and its settingsPermissions).
# Summary
Enhanced the Google OAuth flow to better handle missing permissions and
improved user experience by redirecting to settings/account page.
## Changes
- Added new google-apis-scopes.ts service for better scope management
- Updated Google APIs auth controller for better flow control
- New tests for this logic
## User request
From @bonapara email test and need to better handle user flow during the
connect email flow
Before :
<img width="574" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-28 at 17 58 59"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd54625b-e211-4b2f-b76a-48bcb08b5222"
/>
After :
<img width="1143" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-28 at 16 29 05"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f3d1f2c-9e02-4d25-b949-fe2b20f048f4"
/>
## Reference :
For google specialities, I added this link in the `export const
getGoogleApisOauthScopes` in order to keep that in mind
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/scopes
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12337
When importing emails, matched companies are added, but no event is
triggered. Which means that workflows are not triggered. Adding the
event.
To test:
- create a workflow that listens to company creation
- import emails
- make sure workflow has been triggered
I am seeing an issue where this migrations fails because the
`metadata._typeorm_migrations` table does not exist.
```pgsql
copy _typeorm_migrations from metadata to core
query failed: SELECT * FROM metadata._typeorm_migrations ORDER BY id ASC
error: error: relation "metadata._typeorm_migrations" does not exist
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM ERROR [CopyTypeormMigrationsCommand] Failed to copy migrations: relation "metadata._typeorm_migrations" does not exist
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM ERROR [CopyTypeormMigrationsCommand] undefined
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM ERROR [DatabaseMigrationService] Error running database migrations:
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM ERROR [DatabaseMigrationService] QueryFailedError: relation "metadata._typeorm_migrations" does not exist
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM ERROR [UpgradeCommand] Command failed
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM ERROR [UpgradeCommand] undefined
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM LOG [UpgradeCommand] Command completed!
[Nest] 430 - 06/01/2025, 10:22:35 PM ERROR [QueryFailedError] relation "metadata._typeorm_migrations" does not exist
```
I _think_ this table is not meant to exist anymore - which means that
anyone who is onboarding into the project will run into an issue unless
we handle the case where the table doesn't exist.
We need to handle both the existing case and the non existing case to
support people who _do_ have metadata._typeorm_migrations` to migrate.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/748
In the frame of the work on permissions we
- remove all raw queries possible to use repositories instead
- forbid usage workspaceDataSource.executeRawQueries()
- restrict usage of workspaceDataSource.query() to force developers to
pass on shouldBypassPermissionChecks to use it.
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
