### Description
1.
- We are introducing new field type(Emails)
- We are Forbiding creation of Email field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Emails field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
\
How To Test\
Follow the below steps for testing locally:\
1. Checkout to TWENTY-6261\
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command\
3. Run both the backend and frontend app\
4. Go to Settings/Data model and choose one of the standard objects like
people\
5. Click on Add Field button and choose Emails as the field type
\
### Refs
#6261\
\
### Demo
\
<https://www.loom.com/share/22979acac8134ed390fef93cc56fe07c?sid=adafba94-840d-4f01-872c-dc9ec256d987>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
## Features
- Fetch a workflow and display it in a tree with the React Flow library
- The nodes are positioned by an algorithm
- The feature is put behind a feature flag. The `/workflow/:id` route is
disabled if the flag is off.
- I started implementing a right drawer. That's a big WIP and it will be
finished in another PR.
## How to test this feature
1. Create a workflow instance in the database through a GraphQL query.
See below for instructions.
2. After enabling the feature flag, you should be able to see the
workflow you created in the workflows list. To visualize the workflow,
go to the `/workflow/:id` page where the id is the id of the workflow.
See the video for a quick way to do so.
```gql
// First
mutation createWorkflow($data: WorkflowCreateInput!) {
createWorkflow(data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "test"
}
}
// Second
mutation createWorkflowVersion($data: WorkflowVersionCreateInput!) {
createWorkflowVersion (data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "v1",
"trigger": {
"name": "trigger",
"displayName": "New or Updated Row",
"type": "DATABASE_EVENT",
"settings": {
"eventName": "company.created",
"triggerName": "Company Created"
},
"nextAction": {
"name": "step_1",
"displayName": "Code",
"type": "CODE",
"valid": true,
"settings": {
"serverlessFunctionId": "function_id",
"errorHandlingOptions": {
"retryOnFailure": {
"value": false
},
"continueOnFailure": {
"value": false
}
}
}
}
},
"workflowId": "workflow_id"
}
}
```
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42bbd98c-5e13-447c-9307-461a18ac2195
- Remove raw queries and replace them by using `twentyORM`
- Refactor into services and utils
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR introduces the following changes:
- Add the ability to filter webhooks by objectSingularName and Actions
- Refactor SettingsWebhookDetails edition to not use react-hook-form
(which will be deprecated on the whole project)
- Updating the tests with a complex set of mock (we just need to fix ~30
of them now :D)
<img width="1053" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4e56d972-f129-4789-8d1c-4b5797a8ffd7">
In this PR:
- adding Favorites to Tasks and Notes
- fixing inconsistencies between custom object creation and sync of
standard fields of custom objects
- fixing workspaceCacheVersion not used to invalidate existing
datasource
This pull request introduces a new `FieldMetadataType` called `ACTOR`.
The primary objective of this new type is to add an extra column to the
following objects: `person`, `company`, `opportunity`, `note`, `task`,
and all custom objects.
This composite type contains three properties:
- `source`
```typescript
export enum FieldActorSource {
EMAIL = 'EMAIL',
CALENDAR = 'CALENDAR',
API = 'API',
IMPORT = 'IMPORT',
MANUAL = 'MANUAL',
}
```
- `workspaceMemberId`
- This property can be `undefined` in some cases and refers to the
member who created the record.
- `name`
- Serves as a fallback if the `workspaceMember` is deleted and is used
for other source types like `API`.
### Functionality
The pre-hook system has been updated to allow real-time argument
updates. When a record is created, a pre-hook can now compute and update
the arguments accordingly. This enhancement enables the `createdBy`
field to be populated with the correct values based on the
`authContext`.
The `authContext` now includes:
- An optional User entity
- An optional ApiKey entity
- The workspace entity
This provides access to the necessary data for the `createdBy` field.
In the GraphQL API, only the `source` can be specified in the
`createdBy` input. This allows the front-end to specify the source when
creating records from a CSV file.
### Front-End Handling
On the front-end, `orderBy` and `filter` are only applied to the name
property of the `ACTOR` composite type. Currently, we are unable to
apply these operations to the workspace member relation. This means that
if a workspace member changes their first name or last name, there may
be a mismatch because the name will differ from the new one. The name
displayed on the screen is based on the workspace member entity when
available.
### Missing Components
Currently, this PR does not include a `createdBy` value for the `MAIL`
and `CALENDAR` sources. These records are created in a job, and at
present, we only have access to the workspaceId within the job. To
address this, we should use a function similar to
`loadServiceWithContext`, which was recently removed from `TwentyORM`.
This function would allow us to pass the `authContext` to the jobs
without disrupting existing jobs.
Another PR will be created to handle these cases.
### Related Issues
Fixes issue #5155.
### Additional Notes
This PR doesn't include the migrations of the current records and views.
Everything works properly when the database is reset but this part is
still missing for now. We'll add that in another PR.
- There is a minor issue: front-end tests are broken since this commit:
[80c0fc7ff1).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5741
Filtering was already working.
I just added the required logic in the frontend to allow sorting by
primary link url (because label can be empty)
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#6431
- create new field `activationStatus`
- create migration commands
- add logic to update `activationStatus` on workspace activation and on
stripe subscriptionStatus change
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fcdd5ca-4329-467c-ada8-4dd5d45be259">
Open questions:
- the Tag component does not match Figma in term of style and API for
"transparent" | "outline". We need to discuss with @Bonapara what is the
desired behavior here
- right now opportunity.stage is not nullable. We need to discuss with
@FelixMalfait and @Bonapara what we want here. I would advocate to make
a it nullable for now until we introduce settings on select fields.
custom select are nullable and it could be confusing for the user
Follow up:
- enhance tests on Tags
- add story to cover the No Value column on record board
Closes#5735.
The field probability on opportunity will -
- stop being created for new workspaces (after this PR is merged)
- have "isCustom" value set to true and be displayed as such in the
settings (after this PR is merged + sync-metadata is run on workspace)
- still show in the views (all the time)
This field is deprecated as a standard field but not replaced by another
one, so we are not adding the `(deprecated)` suffix in the label.
Closes#5924.
Adding the "many" side of relations in the table view, and fixing some
issues (glitch in Multi record select, cache update after update).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
As per title!
Also, I'm removing an incorrect logic in the enum migration runner that
takes care of the case where we have no defaultValue but non nullable
which is not a valid business case.
A mini PR to discuss with @Bonapara tomorrow
Separating remote objects from others and making the menu collapsible
(style to be changed)
<img width="225" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-12 at 23 25 59"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/6399865/b4b69d36-6770-43a2-a5e8-bfcdf0a629ea">
Biggest issue is we don't use local storage today so the collapsed state
gets lost.
I see we have localStorageEffect with recoil. Maybe store it there?
Seems easy but don't want to introduce a bad pattern.
Todo:
- style update
- collapsible favorites
- persistent storage
The record chip generator context was missing a edge were a new field of
type relation is created and not yet in the metadata so no chip
generator function can be precomputed.
For now I added a fallback default chip generator, to prevent any bug,
but we might want to add a new chip generator function while creating
the new field ?
- Added Linaria to have compiled CSS on our optimized field displays
- Refactored mocks for performance stories on fields
- Refactored generateRecordChipData into a global context, computed only
when we fetch object metadata items.
- Refactored ChipFieldDisplay
- Refactored PhoneFieldDisplay
In this PR, we implement the display and update of fields from
fromManyObjects (e.g update Employees for a Company).
Product requirement
- update should be triggered at each box check/uncheck, not at lose of
focus
Left to do in upcoming PRs
- add the column in the table views (e.g. column "Employees" on
"Companies" table view)
- add "Add new" possibility when there is no records (as is currently
exists for "one" side of relations:)
<img width="374" alt="Capture d’écran 2024-06-10 à 17 38 02"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/51697796/6f0cc494-e44f-4620-a762-d7b438951eec">
- update cache after an update affecting other records (e.g "Listings"
have one "Person"; if listing A belonged to Person A but then we
attribute listing A to Person B, Person A is no longer owner of Listing
A. For the moment that would not be reflected immediatly leading, to
potential false information if information is accessed from cache)
- try to get rid of the glitch - we also have it on the task page
example. (probably) due to the fact that we are using a recoil state to
read, update then re-read
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/51697796/54f71674-237a-4946-866e-b8d96353c458
## Context
Fixing `setIsFocused is not a function` and the fact that edit buttons
were not showing up anymore.
A new FieldFocusContextProvider has been introduced and added to
RecordInlineCell but not ActivityTargetsInlineCell. This should fix the
issue.
<img width="523" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-05 at 17 42 07"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/1834158/1c1f919e-3829-4e40-b573-3b1b75b7c16f">
