In this PR, I'm fixing part of the impact of soft deletion on optimistic
rendering.
## Backend Vision
1) Backend endpoints will not return soft deleted records (having
deletedAt set) by default. To get the softDeleted records, we will pass
a { withSoftDelete: true } additional param in the query.
2) Record relations will NEVER contain softDeleted relations
## Backend current state
Right now, we have the following behavior:
- if the query filters do not mention deletedAt, we don't return
softDeletedRecords
- if the query filters mention deletedAt, we take it into consideration.
Meaning that if we want to have the softDeleted records in any way we
need to do { or: [ deletedAt: NULL, deletedAt: NOT_NULL] }
## Optimistic rendering strategy
1) useDestroyOne/Many is triggering destroyOptimisticEffects (previously
deleteOptimisticEffects)
2) UseDeleteOne/Many and useRestoreOne/Many are actually triggering
updateOptimisticEffects (as they only update deletedAt field) AND we
need updateOptimisticEffects to take into account deletedAt (future
withSoftDelete: true) filter.
In this PR:
- Refactored components to clarify their behavior. For example, I
renamed the `Workflow` component to `WorkflowVisualizer`. This moved
forward the issue #7010.
- Create two variants of several workflow-related components: one
version for editing and another for viewing. For instance, there is
`WorkflowDiagramCanvasEditable.tsx` and
`WorkflowDiagramCanvasReadonly.tsx`
- Implement the show page for workflow versions. On this page, we
display a readonly workflow visualizer. Users can click on nodes and it
will expand the right drawer.
- I added buttons in the header of the RecordShowPage for workflow
versions: users can activate, deactivate or use the currently viewed
version as the next draft.
**There are many cache desynchronisation and I'll fix them really
soon.**
## Demo
(Turn sound on)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/97fafa48-8902-4dab-8b39-f40848bf041e
When object is not part of the workspace favorite list, we want to show
it in the "opened section" while its record page is accessed.
This PR:
- adds a new component `NavigationDrawerOpenedSection`
- makes workflow versions and runs not system object + creates a
prefilled view index for these
- do not create workspace favorites for these so these do not appear in
the workspace section
<img width="1129" alt="Capture d’écran 2024-09-26 à 11 45 25"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c84d773c-0bef-4dce-b66a-55d7d00b0fb6">
- This PR solves the issue Cursor should not be "pointer" when record
image identifier is not editable #7277
---------
Co-authored-by: Sachin KS <mac@apples-MacBook-Air.local>
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
From PR: #6626Resolves#6763Resolves#6055Resolves#6782
## GTK
I retain the 'Invite by link' feature to prevent any breaking changes.
We could make the invitation by link optional through an admin setting,
allowing users to rely solely on personal invitations.
## Todo
- [x] Add an expiration date to an invitation
- [x] Allow to renew an invitation to postpone the expiration date
- [x] Refresh the UI
- [x] Add the new personal token in the link sent to new user
- [x] Display an error if a user tries to use an expired invitation
- [x] Display an error if a user uses another mail than the one in the
invitation
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6912
By clicking Enter key over and over, user can repeat action Expected:
When 'yes' is typed in popup and user clicks Enter key once, popup
should disappear and correlated action should be performed only once
Implementation:
- Added loading state for buttons onClick and onEnter to disable the
button when the "Delete Api Key" and "Regenerate Api Key" function is
called.
- Added a new function to handle modal close and logic handling on
clicking enter key.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
#### \
Description
- **Added "Exit Settings" Back Button**: Introduced a new back button
labeled "Exit Settings" for easy navigation back to the app content.
- **Implemented Settings Navbar Breadcrumb**: A breadcrumb navigation
bar for each settings page has been added to improve navigation within
the settings. This ensures users can easily trace their location within
the settings.
- **Persistent CTA Zone**: The Call-to-Action (CTA) zone at the top of
the page now remains visible even when the user scrolls down, preventing
unresponsive behavior and improving accessibility.
- **Page Title**: The page title has been added to each settings page
and separated from the breadcrumb, following the app's layout standards.
- we could not reproduce the Billing and CMR Migrations settings on the
app, but we updated the files according, please let's us know if is
there any way to log in with access to these pages, or if is everything
ok.
- Some breadcrumbs are not following the Figma, are following the
current app sections isntead, because we would need to change the
sidebar structure, and we should not do it on this PR
### Demo
<https://www.loom.com/share/21b20a2cd2f3471e94d61563c9901b19?sid=9dc49456-6cae-48e1-9149-8d706f00ab65>
### Refs:
#6144Fixes#6144
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
### Description
- This is the first PR on Phones field;
- We are introducing new field type(Phones)
- We are Forbidding creation of Phone field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Phones field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
**How to Test**
1. Checkout to TWNTY-6260 branch
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command
3. Add custom field of type Phones in settings/data-model
**Loom Video:**\
<https://www.loom.com/share/3c981260be254dcf851256d020a20ab0?sid=58507361-3a3b-452c-9de8-b5b1abda70ac>
### Refs
#6260
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
- Removed the route I previously used to visualize workflows
- Created another tab in the `<ShowPageRightContainer />` component in
which we display the visualizer
Questions:
- Should I use a feature flag to hide the feature?
Closes#6858
# Description
Fix bug bypassing verification in the confirmation modal when pressing
Enter
# Demo
Tested for webhook case (similar to other cases):
1. Press Enter when invalid verification => not delete webhook
2. Press Enter when valid verification => delete webhook
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81aa0aaa-7361-4584-b7ae-b29525f33664
# Ref
Fixes#6663
In this PR:
- revert de-optimization of icons bundle for storybook. This was forcing
the browser to load ~3k files while running stories
- adding lazy loading on Settings route to improve developer experience
(some files will be loaded later)
- fix FE tests: unit, modules stories, pages stories
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR adds the possibility of creating new steps. For now, only
actions are available. The steps are stored on the server, and the
visualizer is reloaded to include them.
Selecting a step opens the right drawer and shows its details. For now,
it's only the id of the step, but in the future, it will be the
parameters of the step.
In the future we'll want to let users add steps at any point in the
diagram. As a consequence, it's crucial to be able to walk in the tree
that make the steps to find the correct place where to put the new step.
I wrote a function that returns where the new step should be inserted.
This function will become recursive once we get branching implemented.
Things to mention:
- Reactflow needs every node and edge to have a unique identifier. In
this PR, I chose to use steps' id as nodes' id. That way, it's easy to
move from a node to a step, which helps make operations on a step
without resolving the step's id from the node's id.
## Features
- Fetch a workflow and display it in a tree with the React Flow library
- The nodes are positioned by an algorithm
- The feature is put behind a feature flag. The `/workflow/:id` route is
disabled if the flag is off.
- I started implementing a right drawer. That's a big WIP and it will be
finished in another PR.
## How to test this feature
1. Create a workflow instance in the database through a GraphQL query.
See below for instructions.
2. After enabling the feature flag, you should be able to see the
workflow you created in the workflows list. To visualize the workflow,
go to the `/workflow/:id` page where the id is the id of the workflow.
See the video for a quick way to do so.
```gql
// First
mutation createWorkflow($data: WorkflowCreateInput!) {
createWorkflow(data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "test"
}
}
// Second
mutation createWorkflowVersion($data: WorkflowVersionCreateInput!) {
createWorkflowVersion (data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "v1",
"trigger": {
"name": "trigger",
"displayName": "New or Updated Row",
"type": "DATABASE_EVENT",
"settings": {
"eventName": "company.created",
"triggerName": "Company Created"
},
"nextAction": {
"name": "step_1",
"displayName": "Code",
"type": "CODE",
"valid": true,
"settings": {
"serverlessFunctionId": "function_id",
"errorHandlingOptions": {
"retryOnFailure": {
"value": false
},
"continueOnFailure": {
"value": false
}
}
}
}
},
"workflowId": "workflow_id"
}
}
```
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42bbd98c-5e13-447c-9307-461a18ac2195
@lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
Issue #4826
Could u review this changes.
Let me know what do you think.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Implement soft delete on standards and custom objects.
This is a temporary solution, when we drop `pg_graphql` we should rely
on the `softDelete` functions of TypeORM.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Modal clickoutside was modified recently.
It was considering portaled component like dropdown outside, so
comparePixel mode for click outside is needed here.
Fixes issue #6487
Added a new prop, `isInRightDrawer` to both the `ShowPageSummaryCard`
and `ShowPageRightContainer` components. This prop allows for different
styles to be applied based on the specific needs of the drawer..
Rather than creating a new component, I opted to add this prop to avoid
code duplication. However, if you would prefer a separate component for
this functionality, I'm happy to make that adjustment—please just let me
know!
Also added `box-sizing: border-box` to `ShowPageSummaryCard` to make
sure it aligns with figma designs.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/38e8d85e-55d5-471e-884a-11c67467f56f
Hi @Bonapara,
Issue #6385
I encountered an issue with the Modal component where its width was
fixed at 400px. While the container housing the Modal adjusted its size
based on the screen width, the Modal itself remained at 400px regardless
of the screen size.
I have implemented a change to address this problem. Could you please
review the changes and let me know your thoughts?
Thank you!
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8358aacb-d6c3-440e-895e-7abc4f8a3534
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
@Bonapara @lucasbordeau
This PR addresses issue #6489:
- Created an entire sidemenu for the block editor.
## Review Request
Please review the implementation of the custom sidemenu.
## Outstanding Issues
1. Sidemenu Positioning:
- The current placement is determined by the BlockNote package.
- I need assistance in positioning it according to the Figma designs.
- Attempted adding margin to the sidemenu, but this solution doesn't
scale well across different screen sizes.
2. Props Spreading in `CustomSidemenu.tsx`:
- Unable to avoid props spreading due to the third-party BlockNote
components.
- Added eslint-disable comments as a temporary solution.
Your insights on these challenges would be greatly appreciated,
especially regarding the sidemenu positioning and any potential
alternatives to props spreading.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4914a037-a115-4189-88bc-a41d121d309d
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
