This PR adds the possibility of creating new steps. For now, only
actions are available. The steps are stored on the server, and the
visualizer is reloaded to include them.
Selecting a step opens the right drawer and shows its details. For now,
it's only the id of the step, but in the future, it will be the
parameters of the step.
In the future we'll want to let users add steps at any point in the
diagram. As a consequence, it's crucial to be able to walk in the tree
that make the steps to find the correct place where to put the new step.
I wrote a function that returns where the new step should be inserted.
This function will become recursive once we get branching implemented.
Things to mention:
- Reactflow needs every node and edge to have a unique identifier. In
this PR, I chose to use steps' id as nodes' id. That way, it's easy to
move from a node to a step, which helps make operations on a step
without resolving the step's id from the node's id.
## Features
- Fetch a workflow and display it in a tree with the React Flow library
- The nodes are positioned by an algorithm
- The feature is put behind a feature flag. The `/workflow/:id` route is
disabled if the flag is off.
- I started implementing a right drawer. That's a big WIP and it will be
finished in another PR.
## How to test this feature
1. Create a workflow instance in the database through a GraphQL query.
See below for instructions.
2. After enabling the feature flag, you should be able to see the
workflow you created in the workflows list. To visualize the workflow,
go to the `/workflow/:id` page where the id is the id of the workflow.
See the video for a quick way to do so.
```gql
// First
mutation createWorkflow($data: WorkflowCreateInput!) {
createWorkflow(data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "test"
}
}
// Second
mutation createWorkflowVersion($data: WorkflowVersionCreateInput!) {
createWorkflowVersion (data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "v1",
"trigger": {
"name": "trigger",
"displayName": "New or Updated Row",
"type": "DATABASE_EVENT",
"settings": {
"eventName": "company.created",
"triggerName": "Company Created"
},
"nextAction": {
"name": "step_1",
"displayName": "Code",
"type": "CODE",
"valid": true,
"settings": {
"serverlessFunctionId": "function_id",
"errorHandlingOptions": {
"retryOnFailure": {
"value": false
},
"continueOnFailure": {
"value": false
}
}
}
}
},
"workflowId": "workflow_id"
}
}
```
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42bbd98c-5e13-447c-9307-461a18ac2195
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Added:
- An "Ask AI" command to the command menu.
- A simple GraphQL resolver that converts the user's question into a
relevant SQL query using an LLM, runs the query, and returns the result.
<img width="428" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-09 at 20 53 09"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/171685816/57127f37-d4a6-498d-b253-733ffa0d209f">
No security concerns have been addressed, this is only a
proof-of-concept and not intended to be enabled in production.
All changes are behind a feature flag called `IS_ASK_AI_ENABLED`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
This PR introduces a new side panel to edit records and the ability to
minimize the side panel.
The goal is leverage this sidepanel to be able to create records while
being in another show page.
I'm opening the PR for feedback since it involved refactoring and
therefore already touches a lot of files, even though it was quick to
implement.
<img width="1503" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-23 at 17 41 37"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/6399865/6f17e7a8-f4e9-4eb4-b392-c756db7198ac">
Fix: (#4204)
The issue was that when that panel was opened its content would wrap
instead of maintaining its desired structure. I fixed this bug by adding
a minimum width to the panel's contents so that they would stay
correctly formatted throughout the opening transition.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
* fix: state consistency issue while closing the email thread right drawer (#4205)
* Refactored to use useRecoilCallback in RightDrawer open/close hook
* - registered an email drawer click outside callback to memorize the thread id when drawer was closed
- added a state to memorize then event that triggered right drawer close
- added a predicate that checks if event that close email thread right drawer is not the same that the open email thread click event AND that the thread that we want to open is not the thread that is just being closed.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* Adding message thread component
* Add state and mocks
* Rename components and use local state for messages
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
* Trigger message thread top bar
* Rename message thread to thread
* Move all components in a directory
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
