This PR is part 3 of RecordPicker refactoring.
It aims to remove all effects from:
- (low level layer) SingleRecordPicker, MultipleRecordPicker
- (higher level layer) RelationPicker, RelationToOneInput,
RelationFromManyInput, ActivityTargetInput...
In this PR, I'm re-grouping Effects in ActivityTarget section and
creating a hook that will be called on inlineCellOpen
## Context
We are experiencing a lot of re-rendering / flash on MultiRecordSelect /
SingleRecordSelect / RelationPicker.
This PR is a first step to refactor this components
## Scope
Only move files to uniformize and prepare for the upcoming refactoring
## Vision
- SingleRecordPicker
- MultipleRecordPicker
- sharing RecordPicker tooling (RecordPickerComponentInstanceContext,
searchState)
Used in other areas:
- RelationPicker (which is actually only a subcomponent of
RelationToOneFieldInput)
- RelationFromManyFieldInput
- WorkflowRelationFieldInput
- etc.
+ remove all effects
+ migrate to the latest APIs
+ make a pass on re-renders to remove them completely (we likely need to
use a bit more familyStates here)
# Introduction
This PR is highly related to previous optimistic cache refactor:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9881
Here we've added some logic within the
`triggerUpdateRelationsOptimisticEffect` which will now run if given
recordInput `deletedAt` field is defined.
If deletion, we will iterate over all the fields searching for
`RELATION` for which deletion might implies necessity to detach the
relation
## Known troubleshooting ( also on main )
We might have to refactor the `prefillRecord` to spread and
overrides`inputValue` over defaultOne as inputValue could be a partial
one for more info please a look to
# Conclusion
Any suggestions are welcomed !
fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9580
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Removed disableBlur property from dropdown because it is no longer
needed since there's only one OverlayContainer component so there can be
only one blur at a time.
- Removed blur CSS properties from every component that used it because
one standalone OverlayContainer is able to handle all cases if placed
properly.
- Also removed disableBackgroundBlur property from SingleRecordSelect
- Removed FieldInputOverlay and FieldTextAreaOverlay components that
were a first attempt to create something like an OverlayContainer
- Used new unified OverlayContainer in RecordInlineCell and
RecordTableCell
- Fixed ScrollWrapper so that it works well both for dropdown with non
overflowing content and dropdown with overflowing content.
- Removed export default value on SearchVariablesDropdown as it is not
used in this codebase
- Refactored SearchVariablesDropdown function as component anti-pattern
- Refactored SearchVariablesDropdownFieldItems UI problems with
separator and missing ScrollWrapper behavior
- Refactored SearchVariablesDropdownObjectItems with UI problems with
separator and missing ScrollWrapper behavior
- Fixed blur bug on Firefox due to wrong placement of the element that
had the CSS property. Blur works on Firefox it it's on the container
that has the highest level in the tree.
- Fixed bug in ActivityTargetInlineCell by removing an unnecessary
container component StyledSelectContainer
- Unified problems of field height with a new common component
FieldInputContainer, instead of putting width and height at the wrong
abstraction level, width and height are a field's concern not a
dropdown, overlay or low-level input concern.
- Fixed block editor dropdown with new OverlayContainer
- Aligning field dropdown with their anchor on inline and table cells,
there are still many small pixel misalignments that give a low quality
impression.
- Fixed FormDateFieldInput that was missing OverlayContainer
This PR is fixing the Task/Note Target picker.
## Issue
A few weeks ago, we have simplified the recordPicker logic. During this
refacto, we stopped making sure the selected records were fetched.
However, the optimistic update of the activity supposed that current
activityTargets are present in the selection in the picker in order to
filter out the removed items.
## Fix
In case we don't find the record in the picker selection, we don't
filter it out (it means the user cannot have removed it)
## Next step
@ijreilly I think we should put it back, as the selected records do not
appear on top anymore
- Rename all parts using the name "relation" to "record" when component
is only selecting record
- Remove the use of scope states in folder
- Rename entities to records
This PR prepares the use of the record picker in workflows
Simplifying the logic around multi-object pickers and search by getting
rid of the behaviour that keeped selected elements even when they did
not match the search filter (eg keeping selected record "Brian Chesky"
in dropdown even when search input is "Qonto"). This allows us to
simplify the fetch queries around the search to only do one query.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
[This PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8210) introduced a
regression, causing noteId or taskId (respectively for noteTarget or
taskTarget creation) to be overwritten with an undefined value in the
input for noteTarget or taskTarget creation.
This is because in ActivityTargetInlineCellEditMode, in addition to the
noteId and taskId we are declaring, we are looking into the object
(noteTarget or taskTarget)'s fields and prefilling the record-to-create
with a value, potentially undefined, for all of the object fields.
So when looping over noteTarget's fields, we would find the `note`
relation field, and eventually add `note: undefined` to the
record-to-create input, in addition to the non-empty and valid existing
`noteId`.
Then in sanitizeRecordInput, from the note added right above, we add an
empty noteId to the input from node, overwriting the "good" noteId.
There are several ways to fix this, I chose to update prefillRecord not
to add an empty "note" object that makes no sense in addition to the
"noteId" we already have at this stage.
It is also possible to update `sanitizeRecordInput` not to overwrite a
value from a relation (noteId from note relation) if there is already a
value in the input.
Closes#5924.
Adding the "many" side of relations in the table view, and fixing some
issues (glitch in Multi record select, cache update after update).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
In this PR, we implement the display and update of fields from
fromManyObjects (e.g update Employees for a Company).
Product requirement
- update should be triggered at each box check/uncheck, not at lose of
focus
Left to do in upcoming PRs
- add the column in the table views (e.g. column "Employees" on
"Companies" table view)
- add "Add new" possibility when there is no records (as is currently
exists for "one" side of relations:)
<img width="374" alt="Capture d’écran 2024-06-10 à 17 38 02"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/51697796/6f0cc494-e44f-4620-a762-d7b438951eec">
- update cache after an update affecting other records (e.g "Listings"
have one "Person"; if listing A belonged to Person A but then we
attribute listing A to Person B, Person A is no longer owner of Listing
A. For the moment that would not be reflected immediatly leading, to
potential false information if information is accessed from cache)
- try to get rid of the glitch - we also have it on the task page
example. (probably) due to the fact that we are using a recoil state to
read, update then re-read
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/51697796/54f71674-237a-4946-866e-b8d96353c458
When writing to the normalized cache (record), it's crucial to use _refs
for relationships to avoid many problems. Essentially, we only deal with
level 0 and generate all fields to be comfortable with their defaults.
When writing in queries (which should be very rare, the only cases are
prefetch and the case of activities due to the nested query; I've
reduced this to a single file for activities
usePrepareFindManyActivitiesQuery 🙂), it's important to use queryFields
to avoid bugs. I've implemented them on the side of query generation and
record generation.
When doing an updateOne / createOne, etc., it's necessary to distinguish
between optimistic writing (which we actually want to do with _refs) and
the server response without refs. This allows for a clean write in the
optimistic cache without worrying about nesting (as the first point).
To simplify the whole activities part, write to the normalized cache
first. Then, base queries on it in an idempotent manner. This way,
there's no need to worry about the current page or action. The
normalized cache is up-to-date, so I update the queries. Same idea as
for optimisticEffects, actually.
Finally, I've triggered optimisticEffects rather than the manual update
of many queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* on click focus on activity body editor
* acitivity editor hot key scope added
* classname prop added escape hot key scope call back added
* passing containerClassName prop for activity editor
* hot key scope added
* console log cleanup
* activity target escape hot key listener added
* tasks filter hot key scope refactor
* scope renaming refactor
* imports order linting refactor
* imports order linting refactor
* acitivity editor field focus state and body editor text listener added
* logic refactor removed state for activity editor fields focus
* removed conflicting click handler of inline cell creating new scope
* linting and formatting
* acitivity editor field focus state and body editor text listener added
* adding text at the end of line
* fix duplicate imports
* styling: gap fix activity editor
* format fix
* Added comments
* Fixes
* Remove useListenClickOutside, state, onFocus and onBlur
* Keep simplifying
* Complete review
* Fix lint
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
