Moves system-level operations (auth, billing, admin) to use the
/metadata endpoint instead of /graphql.
This cleans up the endpoint separation so /graphql is purely for core
objects (Company, People, etc.) and /metadata handles all system
operations.
Part of prep work for webhook/API key core migration.
# What this PR does
This PR introduces what’s needed to progressively refactor the
useDropdown hooks we have.
It removes useDropdownV2 and renames useDropdown used for multi-page
dropdowns to useDropdownContextStateManagement
## The 3 useDropdown hooks
There are currently 3 useDropdown hooks :
One is used for managing states in some dropdowns that have multiple
inner pages with contexts and without recoil. It is limited and would
need a separate refactoring, thus I just renamed it.
Then we have useDropdown and useDropdownV2, which followed our multiple
versions of recoil state management wrappers.
Now that the state management has been stabilized, we can merge
everything on the last version.
## What this refactor will allow next
This refactor will allow to refactor the legacy recoil state management,
because useDropdown is depending on legacy recoil states with scopeId.
Because there are only a dozen of those legacy states left, and the
dropdown’s ones are the harder to refactor, because swapping them as-is
causes a big QA, and if we have a big QA to do on all dropdowns, better
refactor the whole dropdown management and have everything clean.
After this refactor, we will be able to delete the legacy dropdown
states, and proceed with the other legacy states, then removing all the
legacy recoil state mangament.
## How do we allow progressive refactoring ?
There are many places where useDropdown is used.
To have an easier refactoring process, we want to merge multiple small
pull requests so that it is easier to QA and review.
For this we will maintain both legacy component state and component
state V2 in parallel for isDropdownOpen, so that the new hooks
`useOpenDropdown` , `useCloseDropdown` are doing the same thing than
`useDropdown` and `useDropdownV2` .
Thus for the moment, whether we use the legacy hooks or the new ones,
the effects are the same.
And we can have dropdowns operating on the old states and the new states
living side by side in the app.
## QA
Component | Status | Comments
-- | -- | --
CommandMenuActionMenuDropdown | Ok |
RecordIndexActionMenuDropdown | Ok |
RecordShowRightDrawerOpenRecordButton | Ok |
useCloseActionMenu | Ok |
CommandMenuContextChipGroups | Ok |
useCommandMenuCloseAnimationCompleteCleanup | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdown | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownFieldsContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownHiddenFieldsContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownHiddenRecordGroupsContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownLayoutContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownLayoutOpenInContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownMenuContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownRecordGroupFieldsContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownRecordGroupsContent | Ok |
ObjectOptionsDropdownRecordGroupSortContent | Ok |
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdown | Ok |
AggregateDropdownContent | Ok |
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdownFieldsContent | Ok |
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdownMenuContent | Ok |
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdownMenuContent | Ok |
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdownOptionsContent | Ok |
RecordBoard | Ok | Used closeAnyOpenDropdown instead for a better UX
RecordBoardCard | Ok |
useRecordBoardSelection | Ok |
RecordTableColumnAggregateFooterDropdownContent | Ok |
RecordTableColumnFooterWithDropdown | Ok |
useOpenRecordFilterChipFromTableHeader | Ok |
useCloseAnyOpenDropdown | Ok |
useCloseDropdownFromOutside | Removed | Removed because unused
useDropdownV2 | Removed | Removed because all calls have been removed
useOpenDropdownFromOutside | Removed | Removed because unused
useCloseAndResetViewPicker | Ok |
WorkflowVariablesDropdown | Ok |
In morph relation pickers, we were not taking into account permissions
when computing the list of objects to search for, while we should not
search for objects we don't have read permissions on (permission denied
error)
This PR is the first part of a refactoring aiming to deprecate the
hotkey scopes api in favor of the new focus stack api which is more
robust.
The refactored components in this PR are the dropdowns and the side
panel/command menu.
- Replaced `useScopedHotkeys` by `useHotkeysOnFocusedElement` for all
dropdown components, selectable lists and the command menu
- Introduced `focusId` for all dropdowns and created a common hotkey
scope `DropdownHotkeyScope` for backward compatibility
- Replaced `setHotkeyScopeAndMemorizePreviousScope` occurrences with
`usePushFocusItemToFocusStack` and `goBackToPreviousHotkeyScope` with
`removeFocusItemFromFocusStack`
Note: Test that the shorcuts and arrow key navigation still work
properly when interacting with dropdowns and the command menu.
Bugs that I have spotted during the QA but which are already present on
main:
- Icon picker select with arrow keys doesn’t work inside dropdowns
- Some dropdowns are not selectable with arrow keys (no selectable list)
- Dropdowns in dropdowns don’t reset the hotkey scope correctly when
closing
- The table click outside is not triggered after closing a table cell
and clicking outside of the table
This PR fixes a bug where the side panel couldn't be closed after the
execution of a workflow with a form. After the execution of the
workflow, `goBackFromCommandMenu` is called to show the workflow run.
The hotkey scope wasn't reset properly, and the click outside listener
from the side panel is only triggered when the scope is
`CommandMenuFocused`.
This PR sets the hotkey scope to `CommandMenuFocused` when going back or
when navigating inside the command menu history.
Note: (we don't use `setHotkeyScopeAndMemorizePreviousScope` here
because we don't need to memorize the active hotkey scope of the page we
are leaving)
Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/09edf97b-7520-46ce-ade3-6bb6b15ef435
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/16c288cb-1d42-4099-8925-74a673f7a479
### Issue:
overflow of input fields when opening the side panel.
Could be imporved with a better command menu state handling
### Solution:
In command menu hooks, we now close all dropdowns when opening the side
panel. This ensures all UI elements are close properly before the
sidepanel shows up
Fixes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12485
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Added an argument `closeCommandMenuFromShowPageOptionsMenu` which allows
us to not only close the parent action menu if the action is located
inside the record page action menu dropdown, but to also close the
command menu after, which is the behavior we want for the destroy
action.
ressolve #12205
This PR fixes the issue where the record in the command menu was
reopening when clicking the same field again.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52da7b3f-4704-4a9c-8fc4-29534568b0c0
- Added recordId to cells so it can be accessed when
useListenClickOutside is triggered, and compared the previous recordId
with the new one to prevent closing the command menu for the same
record.
- When the field is clicked, we compare the lastRecordId with the new
recordId inside the openRecordInCommandMenu function to avoid reopening
the menu unnecessarily.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduce focus stack to handle hotkeys
This PR introduces a focus stack to track the order in which the
elements are focused:
- Each focused element has a unique focus id
- When an element is focused, it is pushed on top of the stack
- When an element loses focus, we remove it from the stack
This focus stack is then used to determine which hotkeys are available.
The previous implementation lead to many regressions because of race
conditions, of wrong order of open and close operations and by
overwriting previous states. This implementation should be way more
robust than the previous one.
The new api can be incrementally implemented since it preserves
backwards compatibility by writing to the old hotkey scopes states.
For now, it has been implemented on the modal components.
To test this PR, verify that the shortcuts still work correctly,
especially for the modal components.
# Keyboard Navigation and Shortcuts Implementation on the board
This PR implements keyboard navigation and shortcuts for the Record
Board component, enabling users to navigate and interact with board
cards using keyboard inputs.
## Key changes
### Navigation Architecture
- Added `useBoardCardNavigation` hook for directional navigation (arrow
keys)
- Implemented scroll behavior to automatically focus visible cards
- Created card focus/active states with component-level management
### State Management
- Added new component states: `focusedBoardCardIndexesComponentState`,
`activeBoardCardIndexesComponentState`,
`isBoardCardActiveComponentFamilyState`
- Extended index tracking with column/row position indicators
- Create hooks to manage these states
### Hotkey Implementation
- Created new `RecordBoardHotkeyEffect` component for hotkey handling
- Added `BoardHotkeyScope`
- Implemented Escape key handling to clear selections
- Replaced table-specific `TableHotkeyScope` with more generic
`RecordIndexHotkeyScope`. This is because, before, the hotkey scope was
always set to Table inside the page change effect, and we used the table
hotkey scope for board shortcuts, which doesn't make a lot of sense.
Since we don't know upon navigation on which type of view we are
navigating, I introduced this generic hotkey scope which can be used on
the table and on the board.
### Page Navigation Integration
- Modified `PageChangeEffect` to handle both table and board view types
- Added cleanup for board state upon navigating away from record pages
### Component Updates
- Updated `RecordBoardColumn` to track indexes for position-based
navigation
- Added `RecordBoardScrollToFocusedCardEffect` for auto-scrolling to
focused cards
- Added `RecordBoardDeactivateBoardCardEffect` for cleanup
This implementation maintains feature parity with table row navigation
while accounting for the 2D navigation needs of the board view.
## New behaviors
### Arrow keys navigation
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/929ee00d-2f82-43b9-8cde-f7bc8818052f
### Record selection with X
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b534c4d-2865-43ac-8ba3-09cb8c121f06
### Command + Enter opens the record
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0df01d1c-0437-4444-beb1-ce74bcfb91a4
### Escape unselect the records and unfocus the card
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e2bb176b-b6f7-49ca-9549-803eb31bfc23
- Migrated all workflow Recoil states to component states to isolate
each workflow visualizer instance. The use case of having two workflow
visualizers displayed at the same time appeared recently and will grow
in the near future.
- We chose to use the `recordId` as the value for the `instanceId` of
the component states. Currently, there are a few cases where two
workflows or two workflow runs are rendered at the same time. As a
consequence, relying on the `recordId` is enough for the moment.
- However, there is one case where it's necessary to have a component
state scoped to a workflow visualizer instance: the
`workflowVisualizerStatusState`. This component is tightly coupled to
the `<Reactflow />` component instance rendered in the workflow
visualizer, and it must be set to its default value when the component
first renders. I achieved that by using another component instance
context whose instanceId is an identifier returned by the `useId()` hook
in the Workflow Run Card component.
# Ability to navigate dropdown menus with keyboard
The aim of this PR is to improve accessibility by allowing the user to
navigate inside the dropdown menus with the keyboard.
This PR refactors the `SelectableList` and `SelectableListItem`
components to move the Enter event handling responsibility from
`SelectableList` to the individual `SelectableListItem` components.
Closes [512](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/512)
## Key Changes:
- All dropdowns are now navigable with arrow keys
## Technical Implementation:
- Each `SelectableListItem` now has direct access to its own `Enter` key
handler, improving component encapsulation
- Removed the central `Enter` key handler logic from `SelectableList`
- Added `SelectableList` and `SelectableListItem` to all `Dropdown`
components inside the app
- Updated all component implementations to adapt to the new pattern:
- Action menu components (`ActionDropdownItem`, `ActionListItem`)
- Command menu components
- Object filter, sort and options dropdowns
- Record picker components
- Select components
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
> [!WARNING]
> I refactored a bunch of components into utility functions to make it
possible to display the `WorkflowStepHeader` component for **triggers**
in the `CommandMenuWorkflowRunViewStep` component. Previously, we were
asserting that we were displaying the header in `Output` and `Input`
tabs only for **actions**. Handling triggers too required a bunch of
changes. We can think of making a bigger refactor of this part.
In this PR:
- Only display the Flow for Workflow Runs; removed the Code Editor tab
- Allows users to see the Output of trigger nodes
- Prevent impossible states by manually setting the selected tab when
selecting a node
## Demo
### Success, Running and Not Executed steps
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6bebd0f-5da2-4ccc-aef2-d9890eafa59a
### Failed step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e1f4e13a-2f5e-4792-a089-928e4d6b1ac0
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/709
# Description
Closes [#696](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/696)
- `useAction` hooks have been removed for all actions
- Every action can now declare a react component
- Some standard action components have been introduced: `Action`,
`ActionLink` and `ActionModal`
- The `ActionDisplay` component uses the new `displayType` prop of the
`ActionMenuContext` to render the right component for the action
according to its container: `ActionButton`, `ActionDropdownItem` or
`ActionListItem`
- The `ActionDisplayer` wraps the action component inside a context
which gives it all the information about the action
-`actionMenuEntriesComponenState` has been removed and now all actions
are computed directly using `useRegisteredAction`
- This computation is done inside `ActionMenuContextProvider` and the
actions are passed inside a context
- `actionMenuType` gives information about the container of the action,
so the action can know wether or not to close this container upon
execution
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
# Description
I previously introduced the `RecordTitleCell` component, but it was
coupled with the field context, so it was only usable for record fields.
This PR:
- Introduces a new component `TitleInput` for side panel pages which
needed to have an editable title which wasn't a record field.
- Fixes the hotkey scope problem with the workflow step page title
- Introduces a new hook `useUpdateCommandMenuPageInfo`, to update the
side panel page title and icon.
- Fixes workflow side panel UI
- Adds jest tests and stories
# Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c501245c-4492-4351-b761-05b5abc4bd14
On default objects:
- Add see workflows
On workflows:
- Add see all runs (no selection)
On workflow runs:
- Add see workflows (no selection)
- Add see linked workflow (single record selection)
- Add see run version (single record selection)
On workflows versions
- Add see all runs (no selection)
- Add see workflows (no selection)
- Add see linked workflow (single record selection)
- Add see linked runs (single record selection)
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
Workflows step details in workflows and versions should be different
from the node tab in run. For most cases, it was using the same
component. But for forms, it will be a different one.
This PR:
- renames form action into formBuilder. formFiller is coming
- put code into a separated folder
- creates a new component for node details
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/271
This PR
- Removes the feature flag IS_COMMAND_MENU_V2_ENABLED
- Removes all old Right drawer components
- Removes the Action menu bar
- Removes unused Copilot page
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/545
This PR:
- Introduces `commandMenuNavigationMorphItemsState` which stores the
information about the `recordId` and the `objectMetadataItemId` for each
page
- Creates `CommandMenuContextChipEffect`, which queries the records from
the previous pages in case a record has been updated during the
navigation, to keep up to date information and stores it inside
`commandMenuNavigationRecordsState`
- `useCommandMenuContextChips` returns the context chips information
- Style updates (icons background and color)
- Updates `useCommandMenu` to set and reset these new states
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8886848a-721d-4709-9330-8e84ebc0d51e
This PR follows #10700, it is the same refactor but for the workflows
pages.
- Duplicates the right drawer workflow pages for the command menu and
replace the states used in these pages by component states
- We store the component instance id upon navigation to restore the
states when we navigate back to a page
There are still states which are not component states inside the
workflow diagram and workflow command menu pages, we should convert them
in a futur refactor.
`closeCommandMenu` was called programmatically in multiple places for
the workflow, I refactored that to only rely on the click outside
listener. This introduced a wiggling bug on the workflow canvas when we
change node selection. This should be fixed in another PR by updating
the canvas animation to take the animation values of the command menu
instead. I'm thinking we could use [motion
values](https://motion.dev/docs/react-motion-value) for this as I told
you @Devessier
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/491
This PR:
- Duplicates the right drawer pages for the command menu and replace all
the states used in these pages by component states (The right drawer
pages will be deleted when we deprecate the command menu v1)
- Wraps those pages into a component instance provider
- We store the component instance id upon navigation to restore the
states when we navigate back to a page
The only pages which are not updated for now are the pages related to
the workflow objects, this will be done in another PR.
In another PR, to improve the navigation experience I will replace the
icons and titles of the chips by the label identifier and the avatar if
the page is a record page.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a76d3345-01f3-4db9-8a55-331cca8b87e0
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Since I introduced AnimatePresence to animate the exit of the command
menu, the command menu wasn't working properly. By adding this
animation, I had to reset the command menu states at the end of the
animation, otherwise, the component inside the command menu would throw
errors. The problem was that, by closing and instantly reopening the
command menu, the `onExitComplete` wasn't triggered and the states
weren't reset before the opening. By introducing a new state
`isCommandMenuClosingState`, I can reset those states at the beginning
of the opening if the animation didn't have the time to finish.
