[This PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8210) introduced a
regression, causing noteId or taskId (respectively for noteTarget or
taskTarget creation) to be overwritten with an undefined value in the
input for noteTarget or taskTarget creation.
This is because in ActivityTargetInlineCellEditMode, in addition to the
noteId and taskId we are declaring, we are looking into the object
(noteTarget or taskTarget)'s fields and prefilling the record-to-create
with a value, potentially undefined, for all of the object fields.
So when looping over noteTarget's fields, we would find the `note`
relation field, and eventually add `note: undefined` to the
record-to-create input, in addition to the non-empty and valid existing
`noteId`.
Then in sanitizeRecordInput, from the note added right above, we add an
empty noteId to the input from node, overwriting the "good" noteId.
There are several ways to fix this, I chose to update prefillRecord not
to add an empty "note" object that makes no sense in addition to the
"noteId" we already have at this stage.
It is also possible to update `sanitizeRecordInput` not to overwrite a
value from a relation (noteId from note relation) if there is already a
value in the input.
@ehconitin following your question I did a quick refactoring of the show
page - we can push it much further but it would be better to start from
this code than from main
Edit: I will merge to avoid conflicts, this is very far from perfect but
still much better than the mess we had before
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fixed bug that was appearing with records without any activity target
The problem may come from the new TwentyORM that doesn't understand the
filter like before.
This PR Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6942
Other improvements :
- Fetch activities (note and task) title only when loading timeline, so
we don't always have a clickable title.
- Fixed IconButton width regression.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR Solves #6830
## Issue Summary
The tasks are grouped by their respective statuses and displayed on the
ui. The grouping is performed by `lodash.groupBy` which doesn't maintain
explicit ordering of the keys.
## Fix
Sort the tasks groups array by their status on the basis of
reverse-alphabetical order before generating task component for each
task data.
#### Why reverse alphabetical?
It implicitly sorts the statuses as per the order `TODO` ->
`IN_PROGRESS` -> `DONE`
Caveats:
1. Changing the name of one or more status might result in a different
unwanted order.
2. `null` is unhandled, although the original code doesn't allow for
nulls as status while displaying
### Alternative Fix
Maintain an explicit ordering of the statuses and sort the tasks
accordingly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
@lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
Issue #4826
Could u review this changes.
Let me know what do you think.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Issue #6630
It seems this bug is caused by `targetableObjects` being assigned an
empty array, which then leads to an error due to it being undefined.
I've made some changes that should address the issue, but I would
appreciate any feedback or suggestions on alternative solutions.
Please let me know if there is a better approach to resolving this.
Thank you!
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6409798-3320-49b3-834f-2b6888847ed8
Implement soft delete on standards and custom objects.
This is a temporary solution, when we drop `pg_graphql` we should rely
on the `softDelete` functions of TypeORM.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Remove raw queries and replace them by using `twentyORM`
- Refactor into services and utils
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Activity creation was duplicating the new activity on already visited
records of the same type.
The fix was to activate `shouldMatchRootQueryFilter` on createOne for
activity.
Fixes [#6335](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6335)
This pull request is for issue
[#6335](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6335): Refactor
RecordInlineCell tree with a Context to avoid props drilling. For the
refactoring, this PR made changes as below:
- Created new script RecordInlineCellContext.tsx: Defining a context to
pass in useContext()
- Updated RecordInlineCell.tsx: Passing the necessary props as context
values, wrapping with RecordInlineCellContext.Provider
- Updated RecordInlineCellContainer.tsx: Passing the props to
RecordInlineContainer as RecordInlineCellContext
- Updated RecordInlineCellDisplayMode.tsx: retrieves values from
useRecordInlineCellContext instead of directly assigning them
- RecordInlineCellValue.tsx: Removed values passed through
<RecordInlineCellDisplayMode> as they are now retrieved through
useRecordInlineCellContext + Removed the null check for
RecordInlineCellContextProps.
Using RecordInlineCellContext, I believe the context goes to the top of
the hierarchy and passed to the required layers without going through
several layers. However, please let me know if I understood the issue
incorrectly or it is not solved properly.
Thank you in advance for your review!
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
