## Context
The goal is to replace pg_graphql with our own ORM wrapper (TwentyORM).
This PR tries to add some parsing logic to convert graphql requests to
send to the ORM to replace pg_graphql implementation.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
As we grow, the messaging scripts are experiencing performance issues
forcing us to temporarily disable them on the cloud.
While investigating the performance, I have noticed that generating the
entity schema (for twentyORM) in the repository is taking ~500ms locally
on my Mac M2 so likely more on pods. Caching the entitySchema then!
I'm also clarifying naming around schemaVersion and cacheVersions ==>
both are renamed workspaceMetadataVersion and migrated to the workspace
table (the workspaceCacheVersion table is dropped).
- Remove `messageThreadId` from `messageChannelMessageAssociation`
- Update thread merging
- Update all queries which were dependent on this field
- Update some raw queries by using `twentyORM` instead
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#6255
- Move files from `messaging/common` into the correct module
- Remove common module between calendar and messaging
`calendar-messaging-participant-manager`
- Update and fix massaging and calendar participant matching
- Create `MatchParticipantModule`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Refactor connected account module
- Move blocklist into it's own module
- Move contact-creation-manager into it's own module
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Refactor calendar modules and some messaging modules to better
organize them by business rules and decouple them
- Work toward a common architecture for the different calendar providers
by introducing interfaces for the drivers
- Modify cron job to use the new sync statuses and stages
Closes#5748
- Create feature flag
- Add scope `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/profile.emails.read` when
connecting an account
- Get email aliases with google people API, store them in
connectedAccount and refresh them before each message-import
- Update the contact creation logic accordingly
- Refactor
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- move front `onboardingStatus` computing to server side
- add logic to `useSetNextOnboardingStatus`
- update some missing redirections in
`usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation`
- separate subscriptionStatus from onboardingStatus
- Put error handling outside of `refreshAndSaveAccessToken`
- return after failing to refresh access token in
`processMessageBatchImport`
- remove unnecessary token refresh in `processMessageListFetch`
This PR introduce a new decorator named `@WorkspaceJoinColumn`, the goal
of this one is to manually declare the join columns inside the workspace
entities, so we don't have to rely on `ObjectRecord` type.
This decorator can be used that way:
```typescript
@WorkspaceRelation({
standardId: ACTIVITY_TARGET_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.company,
type: RelationMetadataType.MANY_TO_ONE,
label: 'Company',
description: 'ActivityTarget company',
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
inverseSideTarget: () => CompanyWorkspaceEntity,
inverseSideFieldKey: 'activityTargets',
})
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
company: Relation<CompanyWorkspaceEntity> | null;
// The argument is the name of the relation above
@WorkspaceJoinColumn('company')
companyId: string | null;
```
This PR is replacing and removing all the raw queries and repositories
with the new `TwentyORM` and injection system using
`@InjectWorkspaceRepository`.
Some logic that was contained inside repositories has been moved to the
services.
In this PR we're only replacing repositories for calendar feature.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
### Overview
This PR introduces significant enhancements to the MessageQueue module
by integrating `@Processor`, `@Process`, and `@InjectMessageQueue`
decorators. These changes streamline the process of defining and
managing queue processors and job handlers, and also allow for
request-scoped handlers, improving compatibility with services that rely
on scoped providers like TwentyORM repositories.
### Key Features
1. **Decorator-based Job Handling**: Use `@Processor` and `@Process`
decorators to define job handlers declaratively.
2. **Request Scope Support**: Job handlers can be scoped per request,
enhancing integration with request-scoped services.
### Usage
#### Defining Processors and Job Handlers
The `@Processor` decorator is used to define a class that processes jobs
for a specific queue. The `@Process` decorator is applied to methods
within this class to define specific job handlers.
##### Example 1: Specific Job Handlers
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('taskQueue')
export class TaskProcessor {
@Process('taskA')
async handleTaskA(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task A with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task A
}
@Process('taskB')
async handleTaskB(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task B with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task B
}
}
```
In the example above, `TaskProcessor` is responsible for processing jobs
in the `taskQueue`. The `handleTaskA` method will only be called for
jobs with the name `taskA`, while `handleTaskB` will be called for
`taskB` jobs.
##### Example 2: General Job Handler
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('generalQueue')
export class GeneralProcessor {
@Process()
async handleAnyJob(job: { id: string, name: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling job ${job.name} with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for any job
}
}
```
In this example, `GeneralProcessor` handles all jobs in the
`generalQueue`, regardless of the job name. The `handleAnyJob` method
will be invoked for every job added to the `generalQueue`.
#### Adding Jobs to a Queue
You can use the `@InjectMessageQueue` decorator to inject a queue into a
service and add jobs to it.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';
import { InjectMessageQueue, MessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Injectable()
export class TaskService {
constructor(
@InjectMessageQueue('taskQueue') private readonly taskQueue: MessageQueue,
) {}
async addTaskA(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskA', data);
}
async addTaskB(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskB', data);
}
}
```
In this example, `TaskService` adds jobs to the `taskQueue`. The
`addTaskA` and `addTaskB` methods add jobs named `taskA` and `taskB`,
respectively, to the queue.
#### Using Scoped Job Handlers
To utilize request-scoped job handlers, specify the scope in the
`@Processor` decorator. This is particularly useful for services that
use scoped repositories like those in TwentyORM.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue, Scope } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor({ name: 'scopedQueue', scope: Scope.REQUEST })
export class ScopedTaskProcessor {
@Process('scopedTask')
async handleScopedTask(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling scoped task with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for scoped task, which might use request-scoped services
}
}
```
Here, the `ScopedTaskProcessor` is associated with `scopedQueue` and
operates with request scope. This setup is essential when the job
handler relies on services that need to be instantiated per request,
such as scoped repositories.
### Migration Notes
- **Decorators**: Refactor job handlers to use `@Processor` and
`@Process` decorators.
- **Request Scope**: Utilize the scope option in `@Processor` if your
job handlers depend on request-scoped services.
Fix#5628
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
In `messaging-gmail-messages-import.service`, we were refreshing the
access token before each query but we were passing the old access token
to `fetchAllMessages`.
I modified the function to query the updated connectedAccount with the
new access token.
This will solve the 401 errors we were getting in production.
In this PR, I'm doing 2 things:
- refresh connectedAccount token on message-list-fetch. It's currently
only refresh while doing the messages-import. However messages-import
stage are only triggered if new messages are detected (which could take
days or week depending of the messageChannel activity). We should also
refresh it while trying to fetch the list
- handle Unhandled Gmail error code 500 with reason "backendError".
These can occur on gmail side. In this case, we just retry later.
In this PR, I'm mainly doing two things:
- uniformizing messaging-messages-import and
messaging-message-list-fetch behaviors (cron.job and job)
- improving performances of these cron.jobs by not triggering the jobs
if the stage is not relevant
- making sure these jobs have same signature (workspaceId +
messageChannelId)
- Rename syncSubStatus to syncStage
- Rename ongoingSyncStartedAt to syncStageStartedAt
- Remove throttlePauseUntil from db and compute it with
syncStageStartedAt and throttleFailureCount
In this PR, I'm refactoring the messaging module into smaller pieces
that have **ONE** responsibility: import messages, clean messages,
handle message participant creation, instead of having ~30 modules (1
per service, jobs, cron, ...). This is mandatory to start introducing
drivers (gmails, office365, ...) IMO. It is too difficult to enforce
common interfaces as we have too many interfaces (30 modules...). All
modules should not be exposed
Right now, we have services that are almost functions:
do-that-and-this.service.ts / do-that-and-this.module.ts
I believe we should have something more organized at a high level and it
does not matter that much if we have a bit of code duplicates.
Note that the proposal is not fully implemented in the current PR that
has only focused on messaging folder (biggest part)
Here is the high level proposal:
- connected-account: token-refresher
- blocklist
- messaging: message-importer, message-cleaner, message-participants,
... (right now I'm keeping a big messaging-common but this will
disappear see below)
- calendar: calendar-importer, calendar-cleaner, ...
Consequences:
1) It's OK to re-implement several times some things. Example:
- error handling in connected-account, messaging, and calendar instead
of trying to unify. They are actually different error handling. The only
things that might be in common is the GmailError => CommonError parsing
and I'm not even sure it makes a lot of sense as these 3 apis might have
different format actually
- auto-creation. Calendar and Messaging could actually have different
rules
2) **We should not have circular dependencies:**
- I believe this was the reason why we had so many modules, to be able
to cherry pick the one we wanted to avoid circular deps. This is not the
right approach IMO, we need architect the whole messaging by defining
high level blocks that won't have circular dependencies by design. If we
encounter one, we should rethink and break the block in a way that makes
sense.
- ex: connected-account.resolver is not in the same module as
token-refresher. ==> connected-account.resolver => message-importer (as
we trigger full sync job when we connect an account) => token-refresher
(as we refresh token on message import).
connected-account.resolver and token-refresher both in connected-account
folder but should be in different modules. Otherwise it's a circular
dependency. It does not mean that we should create 1 module per service
as it was done before
In a nutshell: The code needs to be thought in term of reponsibilities
and in a way that enforce high level interfaces (and avoid circular
dependencies)
Bonus: As you can see, this code is also removing a lot of code because
of the removal of many .module.ts (also because I'm removing the sync
scripts v2 feature flag end removing old code)
Bonus: I have prefixed services name with Messaging to improve dev xp.
GmailErrorHandler could be different between MessagingGmailErrorHandler
and CalendarGmailErrorHandler for instance
