Solves issue #5917.
This PR is now ready for the first review!
Filters do not fully work yet, there's a problem applying multiple
filters like the following:
```
{
and: [
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
gte: start.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
lte: end.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
],
}
```
I'll do my best to dig into it tonight!
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
Fixes#6833
The view states for unsaved changes were not reseted on view change.
The fix was to just add a call to the existing resetCurrentView when the
viewId changes in the related effect.
Implement soft delete on standards and custom objects.
This is a temporary solution, when we drop `pg_graphql` we should rely
on the `softDelete` functions of TypeORM.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fcdd5ca-4329-467c-ada8-4dd5d45be259">
Open questions:
- the Tag component does not match Figma in term of style and API for
"transparent" | "outline". We need to discuss with @Bonapara what is the
desired behavior here
- right now opportunity.stage is not nullable. We need to discuss with
@FelixMalfait and @Bonapara what we want here. I would advocate to make
a it nullable for now until we introduce settings on select fields.
custom select are nullable and it could be confusing for the user
Follow up:
- enhance tests on Tags
- add story to cover the No Value column on record board
# This PR
- Revise my previous work (PR #5969)
Because it would break the current logic and cause unexpected behavior.
(Issue #5979)
- Solve (Issue #5915) with another way
@lucasbordeau What do you think about my current approach?
@JarWarren Please check it out—I'd love to get your feedback too!
---------
Co-authored-by: Achsan <achsanh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#5915
This issue occurs only when there is no select field.
The user then creates a new one in settings and returns back to the view
picker.
And the bug arises, it because `viewPickerKanbanFieldMetadataId` is not
being set correctly.
When a user navigate to settings, the dirty state should be set to
false. As a result, after re-rendering the view picker component, it
triggers the effect to set `viewPickerKanbanFieldMetadataId`
---------
Co-authored-by: Achsan <achsanh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Fix duplicate view field creation
- Fix redirect to proper settings data model page
- Refetch view fields after field creation (temporary solution)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5598
**Changes:**
- Changed -/+ to eye and eye off icons
- Changed menu width to 200px
- Created separate menu for hidden fields
- Added Edit Fields option to hidden fields menu
- Added test file MenuItemSelectTag (wasn't included in the issue)
As this is my first pr, feedback is very welcome!
**Note:**
These changes cover most of #4363 . I left out the implementation of the
RightIcon in the "Hidden Fields" menu item.
---------
Co-authored-by: kiridarivaki <k.darivaki03@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Some parts of the Frontend used theme constants exported from
`modules/ui` while other parts used theme constants exported from
`twenty-ui`.
This PR centralizes theme constants by removing them from `modules/ui`
completely.
Stripe tables do not support `hasNextPage` and `totalCount`. This may be
because of stripe wrapper do not properly support `COUNT` request.
Waiting on pg_graphql answer
[here](https://github.com/supabase/pg_graphql/issues/519).
This PR:
- removes `totalCount` and `hasNextPage` form queries for remote
objects. Even if it works for postgres, this may really be inefficient
- adapt the `fetchMore` functions so it works despite `hasNextPage`
missing
- remove `totalCount` display for remotes
- fix `orderBy`
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
The whole viewBar component was re-rendered on view changes which was
introducing performance issue. The need was to compute page title, this
should be done in a lower level component
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
## Context
For users with many records, only the first n*60 records were loaded on
board views (n being the number of visible columns). This was because of
the following behavior:
- watch for end of column visibility changes. If an end of column is
visible, try to fetch more. However, watching for visbility changes is
not reliable enough.
## What we want
If an end of column is visible, try to fetch more. If no more records is
availble in pagination, do not fetch more
# This PR
- Moves dev and ci scripts to the `project.json` file in the
twenty-front package
- Adds a project.json file in the root of the project with the main
start command that start both twenty-server and twenty-front
applications concurrently
- Updates the script command of the root project with the start:prod
command (replacing the start command which will be used in dev with the
help of nx)
- Add a start:prod command in the twenty-front app, replacing the start
command (now used for dev purpose)
Issue ref #4645
@charlesBochet @FelixMalfait please let me know how can I improve it
---------
Co-authored-by: Thaïs Guigon <guigon.thais@gmail.com>
- Fix default value sent to backend, using single quotes by default
- Use default value in field definition and column definition so that
field inputs can access it
- Used currency default value in CurrencyFieldInput
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR, I'm fixing two things on the ViewPicker in Create mode:
- if the Dropdown has no max height, it should not be scrollable (which
is causing issue with inner dropdowns being cut by overflow: hidden
- if the user has changed the icon, the type or the name of the view,
consider the create form as isDirty and prevent its value to be
overriden by re-renders (cache updates for example)
We used to not type properly the return of getRecordFromCache before the
work from last week.
The getViewFromCache function was patching this temporarily in a "dirty"
way.
Now that this is cleaner, I'm removing the typescript patch. This fixing
several behaviors on viewBar
Split from https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/4518
Related to #4766
Mutualizes eslint config between projects.
I didn't include `twenty-server` in this PR as this was causing too many
lint errors.
