# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
This PR fixes many bugs on advanced filters, the goal here was to have
CRUD working with other simple filters and sorts.
In order to test this PR you'll have to run a sync metadata.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/560
## Changed positionInViewFilterGroup field metadata type
This PR changes the type of positionInViewFilterGroup to NUMERIC instead
of POSITION, there certainly was a confusion during the initial
development, where POSITION type seemed relevant but it is not for this
particular feature because the position in a view filter group is not
the position of a record, which is used for displaying and re-ordering
purpose in table and kanban views.
Here the positionInViewFilterGroup is a specific position concept tied
to a custom feature, and it is handled by the specific logic of this
advanced filter dropdown layout.
## Create new ids when duplicating a view
When we use create view from an existing view, the logic in
useCreateViewFromCurrentView will copy over filters, filter groups and
sorts. The problem is that it copies it with the same ids, and that if
the backend manages somehow to create new ids, the ids that are put in
parentViewFilterGroupId are corresponding to the old filter groups not
the duplicated new ones.
So we had to create a map of old id => new id so that everything that
has to be sent to the backend for creation already has the same mapping
of parent id but with new ids generated by the frontend.
## Bug with creating a simple filter
We couldn't create a simple filter when advanced filters were set, this
was because of findDuplicateRecordFilterInNonAdvancedRecordFilters which
wasn't doing what it's naming tells, it wasn't filtering on simple
filters only before looking for duplicates.
## Clean code
- Use lastChildPosition directly from
useChildRecordFiltersAndRecordFilterGroups instead of drilling it down
- Refactored AdvancedFilterDropdownButton to extract the code lower
where it is really needed in AdvancedFilterChip
- Renamed a few View to Record naming where relevant
This PR implements CRUD for view filter groups with the new logic as
already done for view filters and view sorts.
It also completely removes the old combined view filter group states and
usage.
This PR is quite big but the impact is limited since it only changes
advanced filters module, which is under feature flag at the moment, and
it is already in a broken state so unusable, even if someone activates
the feature flag.
This PR removes what's left from record filter and record sort previous
logic to handle CRUD and state management with view.
So everything that is named combinedFilter and combinedSort is removed
here.
We implement currentRecordFilters and currentRecordSorts everywhere.
We also remove the event in a state onSortSelectComponentState. (a
pattern we want to avoid)
In this huge (sorry!) PR:
- introducing objectMetadataItem in contextStore instead of
objectMetadataId which is more convenient
- splitting some big hooks into smaller parts to avoid re-renders
- removing Effects to avoid re-renders (especially onViewChange)
- making the view prefetch separate from favorites to avoid re-renders
- making the view prefetch load a state and add selectors on top of it
to avoir re-renders
As a result, the performance is WAY better (I suspect the favorite
implementation to trigger a lot of re-renders unfortunately).
However, we are still facing a random app freeze on view creation. I
could not investigate the root cause. As this seems to be already there
in the precedent release, we can move forward but this seems a urgent
follow up to me ==> EDIT: I've found the root cause after a few ours of
deep dive... an infinite loop in RecordTableNoRecordGroupBodyEffect...
prastoin edit: close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10253
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Fix#8757
This PR is adding the Add new button on view groups.
Also this PR fix an issue where the pending record can be draggable, and
is causing error.
<img width="1119" alt="Screenshot 2024-12-10 at 4 24 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fd01e99-c85e-4a06-a733-cbf3cc32957d">
It also start to issues with the way we're using Context.
We're initializing pretty much all Context like this:
```typescript
export const RecordTableContext = createContext<RecordTableContextProps>(
{} as RecordTableContextProps,
);
```
This is causing issues when by mistake we use the context like this
outside the Provider hierarchy:
```typescript
const context = useContext(RecordTableContext);
```
This is going to fail silently, and all the context variables become
undefined...
To fix this I've introduced an util called `createRequiredContext`, this
one is returning an array containing the provider and the hook to
retrieve the context.
The context is initialized to undefined inside this utility, this way we
can check if the value has been initialized with the provider to check
if we're inside it. It'll throw an error if this one is used outside the
provider.
The return values are properly typed, so `undefined` is not added to the
value of the Context.
I'll create a followup ticket to use this new utility function, if
that's ok and replace it everywhere in the codebase.
We can also consider adding a eslint rule to warn about the use of
`createContext` directly.
Fix#4244 and #4356
This pull request introduces the new "view groups" capability, enabling
the reordering, hiding, and showing of columns in Kanban mode. The core
enhancement includes the addition of a new entity named `ViewGroup`,
which manages column behaviors and interactions.
#### Key Changes:
1. **ViewGroup Entity**:
The newly added `ViewGroup` entity is responsible for handling the
organization and state of columns.
This includes:
- The ability to reorder columns.
- The option to hide or show specific columns based on user preferences.
#### Conclusion:
This PR adds a significant new feature that enhances the flexibility of
Kanban views through the `ViewGroup` entity.
We'll later add the view group logic to table view too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
