# Introduction
Diff description: ~500 tests and +500 additions
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/731
## What has been done here
In a nutshell on a field metadata type ( `SELECT MULTI_SELECT` ) update,
we will be browsing all `ViewFilters` in a post hook searching for some
referencing related updated `fieldMetadata` select. In order to update
or delete the `viewFilter` depending on the associated mutations.
## How to test:
- Add FieldMetadata `SELECT | MULTI_SELECT` to an existing or a new
`objectMetadata`
- Create a filtered view on created `fieldMetadata` with any options you
would like
- Remove some options ( in the best of the world some that are selected
by the filter ) from the `fieldMetadata` settings page
- Go back to the filtered view, removed or updated options should have
been hydrated in the `displayValue` and the filtered data should make
sense
## All filtered options are deleted edge case
If an update implies that a viewFilter does not have any existing
related options anymore, then we remove the viewFilter
## Testing
```sh
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/update-one-field-metadata-related-record.integration-spec.ts (27 s)
update-one-field-metadata-related-record
SELECT
✓ should delete related view filter if all select field options got deleted (2799 ms)
✓ should update related multi selected options view filter (1244 ms)
✓ should update related solo selected option view filter (1235 ms)
✓ should handle partial deletion of selected options in view filter (1210 ms)
✓ should handle reordering of options while maintaining view filter values (1487 ms)
✓ should handle no changes update of options while maintaining existing view filter values (1174 ms)
✓ should handle adding new options while maintaining existing view filter (1174 ms)
✓ should update display value with options label if less than 3 options are selected (1249 ms)
✓ should throw error if view filter value is not a stringified JSON array (1300 ms)
MULTI_SELECT
✓ should delete related view filter if all select field options got deleted (1127 ms)
✓ should update related multi selected options view filter (1215 ms)
✓ should update related solo selected option view filter (1404 ms)
✓ should handle partial deletion of selected options in view filter (1936 ms)
✓ should handle reordering of options while maintaining view filter values (1261 ms)
✓ should handle no changes update of options while maintaining existing view filter values (1831 ms)
✓ should handle adding new options while maintaining existing view filter (1610 ms)
✓ should update display value with options label if less than 3 options are selected (1889 ms)
✓ should throw error if view filter value is not a stringified JSON array (1365 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots: 18 passed, 18 total
Time: 27.039 s
```
## Out of scope
- We should handle ViewFilter validation when extracting its definition
from the metadata
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1009
## Concerns
- Are we able through the api to update an RATING fieldMetadata ? ( if
yes than that's an issue and we should handle RATING the same way than
for SELECT and MULTI_SELECT )
- It's not possible to group a view from a MULTI_SELECT field
The above points create a double nor a triple "lecture" to the post hook
effect:
- ViewGroup -> only SELECT
- VIewFilter -> only SELECT || MULTI_SELECT
- Rating nothing
I think we should determine the scope of all of that
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Preview :
<img width="501" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-02 at 16 24 34"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c649df1-0e26-4ddc-8e13-ebd78af7ec09"
/>
Done :
- Fix getCalendarEventsFromPersonIds and getCalendarEventsFromCompanyId
(include accountOwner check)
- Fix permission check on pre-hook - Pre-hook seems useless, calendar
events are always on METADATA or SHARE_EVERYTHING visibility, else post
hook always has the responsibility of returning the data user can
access. >> To delete or to keep in case other visibility options are
added ?
- Add post hook to secure finOne / findMany calendarEvents resolver
- Update design
To do :
- same on messages (PR to arrive)
closes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9826
# Introduction
In this PR using the Ts AST dynamically compute what to export,
gathering non-runtime types and interface in an `export type`
[Export type TypeScript
documentation](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-3-8.html)
From
```ts
// index.ts
export * from "submodule"
```
To
```ts
export type { SomeType } from "submodule";
export { SomeFunction, SomeConst } from "submodule";
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/644
## Motivations
- Most explicit and maintainable
- Best for tree-shaking
- Clear dependency tracking
- Prevents name collisions
## Important note
Please keep in mind that I will create, very soon, a dedicated
`generate-barrel` package in our yarn workspaces in order to:
- Make it reusable for twenty-ui
- Split in several files
- Setup lint + tsconfig
- Add tests
## Conclusion
As usual any suggestions are more than welcomed !
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/393
- enforcing object-records permission checks in resolvers for now. we
will move the logic to a lower level asap
- add integration tests that will still be useful when we have moved the
logic
- introduce guest seeded role to test limited permissions on
object-records
More progress on translations:
- Migrate from translations.io to crowdin
- Optimize performance and robustness
- Set workspaceMember/user locale upon signup
In this PR
- introducing roles module to separate roles logic (assign a Role, get a
workspace's roles etc.) from permission logic (check if a user has a
permission)
- Introduces getRoles endpoint to fetch a workspace's roles
- introduces the first permission check: getRoles in only accessible to
users with permission on ROLE setting. Implemented
validatesUserHasWorkspaceSettingPermissionOrThrow
Closes#9151
## Description
This PR automatically sets a workspace's logo based on the user's work
email domain during signup. When a user creates a new workspace using
their work email (e.g., @airbnb.com), the system will fetch and set
their company logo from twenty-icons.com as the default workspace logo.
## Implementation Details
- Added a new `CompanyEnrichmentService` to handle company-related data
enrichment
- Created a modular architecture that supports future enrichment
features (e.g., company name, details)
- Integrated with existing work email detection
- Maintains user ability to override the logo later
## Testing
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f7855c99-462a-4053-9e52-29649e954275
I tested the following scenarios:
- Signing up with a work email (e.g., @company.com) → Logo is
automatically set
- Signing up with a personal email (e.g., @gmail.com) → No logo is set
- User can still upload a custom logo after automatic setting
## Technical Notes
- Uses existing `isWorkEmail` utility
- Structured for future extensibility (additional company data
enrichment)
- No breaking changes to existing functionality
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
