# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
- create a form filler component
- send the response on submit
- put back a field name. We need it for the step output
- validate a form is well set before activation
TODO:
- we need to refresh to see the form submitted. We need to discuss about
a strategy
- the response is not saved in the step settings. We need a new endpoint
to update workflow run step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f34a6cd-ed8c-4d9a-a1d4-51455cc83443
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/271
This PR
- Removes the feature flag IS_COMMAND_MENU_V2_ENABLED
- Removes all old Right drawer components
- Removes the Action menu bar
- Removes unused Copilot page
When a step is deleted in a draft version, its variable are still
available in the following steps. This is because step output schema was
not reset. We needed either to refresh or to change version so output
schema gets updated.
This PR:
- migrates to a family state global + context not linked to a component
- add a reset step output schema function
- reset when a step is removed
Steps are broken when a variable is set.
This is because component instance is not set for version and run
visualizers.
Each step viewer should be wrapped by the instance context.
Each diagram visualizer should be responsible for populating the output
schema.
Also fixing a billing error when running workflow.
This PR follows #10700, it is the same refactor but for the workflows
pages.
- Duplicates the right drawer workflow pages for the command menu and
replace the states used in these pages by component states
- We store the component instance id upon navigation to restore the
states when we navigate back to a page
There are still states which are not component states inside the
workflow diagram and workflow command menu pages, we should convert them
in a futur refactor.
`closeCommandMenu` was called programmatically in multiple places for
the workflow, I refactored that to only rely on the click outside
listener. This introduced a wiggling bug on the workflow canvas when we
change node selection. This should be fixed in another PR by updating
the canvas animation to take the animation values of the command menu
instead. I'm thinking we could use [motion
values](https://motion.dev/docs/react-motion-value) for this as I told
you @Devessier
- Create a workflow version component family state for each workflow
version : `stepId` => `StepOutputSchema`
- Populate this state when reaching the workflow visualizer of the
workflow version
- Wrap the right drawer when in edit mode with the context. It is the
only one who needs this schema
Next step:
- read this state from the variables
- Improve the type-safety of the objects mapping the id of a right
drawer or side panel view to a React component
- Improve the types of the `useTabList` hook to type the available tab
identifiers strictly
- Create a specialized `WorkflowRunDiagramCanvas` component to render a
`WorkflowRunDiagramCanvasEffect` component that opens
`RightDrawerPages.WorkflowRunStepView` when a step is selected
- Create a new side panel view specifically for workflow run step
details
- Create tab list in the new side panel; all the tabs are `Node`,
`Input` and `Output`
- Create a hook `useWorkflowSelectedNodeOrThrow` not to duplicate
throwing mechanisms
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/432
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8d5df7dc-0b99-49a2-9a54-d3eaee80a8e6
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/410
- Added `openRecordIn` column in the `view` entity, which is set to
`SIDE_PANEL` by default
- Created a new option inside the view option dropdown to be able to set
`openRecordIn`
- Updated all record show page openings to reflect the setting behavior
- For `workflow`, `workflowVersion` and `workflowRun` (what I call
workflow objects), we want the default view `openRecordIn` to be set to
`RECORD_PAGE`. When seeding the views for the new workspaces, we set
`openRecordIn` to `RECORD_PAGE` for workflow objects. Since the workflow
objects views `openRecordIn` will be set to the default value
`SIDE_PANEL` for the existing workspaces when the sync metadata runs, I
created a script to run in the 0.43 update to update this value.
- Updated `closeCommandMenu` because of problems introduced by the
animate presence wrapper around the command menu. We now reset the
states at the end of the animation.
Note: We want to be able to open all workflow objects pages in the side
panel, but this requires some refactoring of the workflow module. For
now @Bonapara wanted to allow the possibility to change the
`openRecordIn` setting to `SIDE_PANEL` even for the workflows even if
it's buggy and not ready for the moment. Since this is an experimental
feature, it shouldn't cause too many problems.
This PR introduces a new Recoil state to store the flow.
A few parts of the application need to know the definition of the
current flow. Previously, we stored the workflow version's ID and
fetched its definition with the `useWorkflowVersion` hook. However, we
must use another strategy to visualize workflow runs. Indeed, we now
store the definition of the workflow in the workflow run output when it
is executed. This is useful for draft versions, which can change between
the moment they were executed and the moment they are visualized.
- Do not render a source handle for the leaf nodes
- Upgrade the `@xyflow/react` library
| Before | After |
|--------|--------|
| 
| 
|
## Other options considered
React Flow exposes a hook to get the connections of the current node. I
tried to use this hook – which makes things way simpler – but I couldn't
find a way to make it work in Storybook. I had two options: 1. Set up
React Flow to render the nodes properly, 2. Mock the hook in Storybook.
The first option was hard to achieve as the `<Reactflow />` component
renders a whole flow, and it doesn't play well with the idea of
rendering a single node in a story.
The second option seemed overkill as mocking modules with Storybook is
not straightforward. See
https://storybook.js.org/docs/writing-stories/mocking-data-and-modules/mocking-modules.
I chose to keep the initial version of my code, written before I spot a
function simplifying the code. We can give it a look another time.
- Remove the `WorkflowDiagramBaseStepNode` component
- Create the `WorkflowDiagramStepNodeIcon` component to centralize the
icon put in workflow step nodes; that was the main task of the
`WorkflowDiagramBaseStepNode` component and the new
`WorkflowDiagramStepNodeIcon` component made it obsolete
- Update the `WorkflowDiagramStepNodeBase` component to be THE low level
component
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
**This PR implements a new layout for the visualizer, but the dimensions
of the nodes will change soon. I used hard-coded dimensions, like
`40px`, but I'll update them when I work on fixing the nodes' design. I
think we can merge this PR first and then fix the nodes' design.**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/580fa812-ee8e-4452-b6ac-ca55ecb31759
- Clean Playwright's configuration:
- Remove artificial 500ms delay between each step
- Group all tests under a `chrome` project relying on a `setup` project
to get an authentication state which all tests can reuse
- Changes on the `Sign up with invite link via email` test:
- Generate a new email for each test trial, as previously it was failing
when run many times
- Make deleting the account part of the test; if we write other tests
for account sign-up, we'll prefer to delete the accounts with an HTTP
call to speed up things
- Added some assertions to ensure we reached steps when expected, as we
removed the 500ms delay between each step, and it made some assertions
fail
- Wrote new tests for workflows:
- Created `Create workflow`, a test asserting we can create a workflow
from the record table
- Created `Create simple workflow`, a test asserting we can create a
simple flow; I will add more assertions to this test and write other
tests once this first PR is approved
- I make HTTP calls to delete and destroy workflows after they run to
keep the database clean
- Added a data-testid to ensure we focus elements from the Cmd+K; our
selectors are not strong – see `getByRole('textbox')` – and I preferred
to scope them to a root element
- Added an `aria-label` to a button
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
