# This PR
- Addressing #3644
- Migrates the `findOne` and the `findMany` Rest API to use TwentyORM
directly
- Adds integration tests to the migrated methods
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
In this PR:
- Remove deactivated objects from ActivityTargetInlineCell record picker
- Prevent users to deactivate createdAt, updatedAt, deletedAt fields on
any objects
Still left:
- write unit tests on the assert utils
- write integration tests on field metadata service
- prevent users to deactivate createdAt, updatedAt, deletedAt on FE
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/526
(for reminder:
1. Make defaultRoleId non-nullable for an active workspace
2. Remove permissions V1 feature flag
3. Set member role as default role for new workspaces
About 1.:
An active workspace's defaultRoleId should never be null.
We can't rely on a simple postgres NOT NULL constraint as defaultRoleId
will always be initially null when the workspace is first created since
the roles do not exist at that time.
Let's add a more complex rule to ensure that
About 3.:
In the first phase of our deploy of permissions, we chose to assign
admin role to all existing users, not to break any existing behavior
with the introduction of the feature (= existing users have less rights
than before).
As we deploy permissions to all existing and future workspaces, let's
set the member role as default role for future workspaces.
)
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
## Context
- Removing search* integration tests instead of fixing them because they
will be replaced by global search very soon
- Fixed billing + add missing seeds to make them work
- Fixed integration tests not using consistently the correct "test" db
- Fixed ci not running the with-db-reset configuration due to nx
configuration being used twice for different level of the command
- Enriched .env.test
- Fixed parts where exceptions were not thrown properly and not caught
by exception handler to convert to 400 when needed
- Refactored feature flag service that had 2 different implementations
in lab and admin panel + added tests
- Fixed race condition when migrations are created at the same timestamp
and doing the same type of operation, in this case object deletion could
break because table could be deleted earlier than its relations
- Fixed many integration tests that were not up to date since the CI has
been broken for a while
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
This PR contains several SNAPSHOT files explaining big +
While refactoring the Object Model settings page in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10653, encountered a critical
issue when submitting either one or both names with `""` empty string
hard corrupting a workspace.
This motivate this PR reviewing server side validation
I feel like we could share zod schema between front and back
## Refactored server validation
What to expect from Names:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Contains only a-z A-Z and 0-9
- Follows camelCase
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
What to expect from Labels:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive ( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10694
## Creation integrations tests
Created new integrations tests, following
[EachTesting](https://jestjs.io/docs/api#testeachtablename-fn-timeout)
pattern and uses snapshot to assert errors message. These tests cover
several failing use cases and started to implement ones for the happy
path but object metadata item deletion is currently broken unless I'm
mistaken @Weiko is on it
## Notes
- [ ] As we've added new validation rules towards names and labels we
should scan db in order to standardize existing values using either a
migration command or manual check
- [ ] Will review in an other PR the update path, adding integrations
tests and so on
A user should not be able to delete their account if they are the last
admin of a workspace.
It means that if a user wants to sign out of twenty, they should delete
their workspace, not their account
In this PR
- updateWorkspaceMemberRole api was changed to stop allowing null as a
valid value for roleId. it is not possible anymore to just unassign a
role from a user. instead it is only possible to assign a different role
to a user, which will unassign them from their previous role. For this
reason in the FE the bins icons next to the workspaceMember on a role
page were removed
- updateWorkspaceMemberRole will throw if a user attempts to update
their own role
- tests tests tests!
Workspace Member will get their own record page in the future.
This PR lays backend changes to prepare for this:
- Settings most fields on WorkspaceMember as system fields
- Renaming workspaceMember/workspaceMemberId to
forWorkspaceMember/forWorkspaceMemberId as it conflicts with the morph
relationship, if we want to be able to add a workspace member as
favorite
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Adding permission gates on workspaceMember to only allow user with
admin permissions OR users attempting to update or delete themself to
perform write operations on workspaceMember object
- Reverting some changes to treat workflow objects as regular metadata
objects (any user can interact with them)
- (fix) Block updates on soft deleted records
Adding permission gates on all workspace-invitations endpoints:
sendInvitation, resendInvitation, deleteWorkspaceInvitation,
findWorkspaceInvitations (the latter being from my understanding only
used to list the invitations to then re-send them or detee them).
+ tests on Api & webhooks permission gates
Following a conversation with @etiennejouan and @martmull, we are adding
a permission gate on billing resolver's checkoutSession, which should
only be accessible to entitled users or at workspace creation (when
there are no roles yet), when the subscription is incomplete
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/393
- enforcing object-records permission checks in resolvers for now. we
will move the logic to a lower level asap
- add integration tests that will still be useful when we have moved the
logic
- introduce guest seeded role to test limited permissions on
object-records
In this PR
- closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/313
- adding permission gates on workspace settings and security settings
- adding integration tests for each of the protected setting and
security
# This PR
- Addressing #3644
- Migrates the `POST rest/*` endpoint to use TwentyORM directly
- Adds integration tests
- Refactors common login in the v2 service file
- Refactors test utility files
# This PR
- Addressing #3644
- Migrates the `DELETE /rest/*` endpoint to use TwentyORM
- Factorizes common middleware logic into a common module
---------
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Solves [ https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/214 ]
**TLDR**
Add unit and integration tests to Billing. First approach to run jest
integration tests directly from VSCode.
**In order to run the unit tests:**
Run unit test using the CLI or with the jest extension directly from
VSCode.
**In order to run the integration tests:**
Ensure that your database has the billingTables. If that's not the case,
migrate the database with IS_BILLING_ENABLED set to true:
` npx nx run twenty-server:test:integration
test/integration/billing/suites/billing-controller.integration-spec.ts`
**Doing:**
- Unit test on transformSubscriptionEventToSubscriptionItem
- More tests cases in billingController integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
isLabelSyncedWithName should be nullable for fieldMetadata, as it is for
objectMetadata.
+ Adding missing validation on label and name sync in
fieldMetadataService for creation and update
+ adding metadata tests
In this PR
1. Add integration tests for /metadata (master issue:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8719)
2. Fix relation deletion: index on "from" object was not deleted,
impeding creation of a new relation between the same two objects A and B
after relation between A and B was deleted
Run the CI integrationin sync mode
and add the option to run it without db reset
cleaning all the useless integration test
---------
Co-authored-by: guillim <guillaume@twenty.com>
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-7526](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-7526).
---
### Description
For workspace members, the deletion of multiple members is a special
case that is not permitted by the method for regular users. As a result,
we ensure that multiple deletions are not processed.
For certain tests, both an account ID and a user ID are required. We are
utilizing Tim's account for all testing purposes, as specified by the
token in `jest-integration.config.ts`. To streamline this process, we
have defined a constant to store and reference the account ID and user
ID during testing.Refs
#7526
### Dem
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-7526](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-7526).
---
### Description
NoteTargets and MessageThreads are special cases because they do not
have a notable property that we could use in "update" the test cases,\
for NoteTargets we are using the personId, testing the relation, but for
MessageThreads we are using updatedAt. To test the relations for
MessageThreads\
we would need to update another object (Message) because the relation is
ONE_TO_MANY, updating another object in a test that would update the
current tested object sounds incorrect.\
In the NoteTargets, we can update the NoteTarget object because the
relation is MANY_TO_ONE\
for some tests we need an account ID, we are using Tim's account for all
the tests (the token in jest-integration.config.ts), so we are using a
constant to use the account ID
### Refs
#7526
### Demo
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
