# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
- create a form filler component
- send the response on submit
- put back a field name. We need it for the step output
- validate a form is well set before activation
TODO:
- we need to refresh to see the form submitted. We need to discuss about
a strategy
- the response is not saved in the step settings. We need a new endpoint
to update workflow run step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f34a6cd-ed8c-4d9a-a1d4-51455cc83443
When a step is deleted in a draft version, its variable are still
available in the following steps. This is because step output schema was
not reset. We needed either to refresh or to change version so output
schema gets updated.
This PR:
- migrates to a family state global + context not linked to a component
- add a reset step output schema function
- reset when a step is removed
## Introduction
Added coverage on the `useDeleteOneRecord` hooks, especially its
optimistic behavior feature.
Introduced a new testing tool `InMemoryTestingCacheInstance` that has
builtin very basic expectors in order to avoid future duplication when
covering others record hooks `update, create, destroy` etc etc
## Notes
Added few comments in this PR regarding some builtin functions I've
created around companies and people mocked object model and that I think
could be cool to spread and centralize within a dedicated "class
template"
Also put in light that unless I'm mistaken some tests are running on
`RecordNode` and not `RecordObject`
Took few directions on my own that as I always I would suggestion nor
remarks on them !
Let me know
## Misc
- Should we refactor `useDeleteOneRecord` tests to follow `eachTesting`
pattern ? => I feel like this is inappropriate as this hooks is already
high level, the only plus value would be less tests code despite
readability IMO
This PR is part 3 of RecordPicker refactoring.
It aims to remove all effects from:
- (low level layer) SingleRecordPicker, MultipleRecordPicker
- (higher level layer) RelationPicker, RelationToOneInput,
RelationFromManyInput, ActivityTargetInput...
In this PR, I'm re-grouping Effects in ActivityTarget section and
creating a hook that will be called on inlineCellOpen
This PR simply implements record filter group states and context, as we
did for record filter and record sort.
We use a separate context for record filter and record filter group,
we'll see later if it can be merged in practice, but better be cautious
for now.
# Context
To enable search records sorting by ts_rank_cd / ts_rank, we have
decided to add a new search resolver serving `GlobalSearchRecordDTO`.
-----
- [x] Test to add - work in progress
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/357
## Context
We are experiencing a lot of re-rendering / flash on MultiRecordSelect /
SingleRecordSelect / RelationPicker.
This PR is a first step to refactor this components
## Scope
Only move files to uniformize and prepare for the upcoming refactoring
## Vision
- SingleRecordPicker
- MultipleRecordPicker
- sharing RecordPicker tooling (RecordPickerComponentInstanceContext,
searchState)
Used in other areas:
- RelationPicker (which is actually only a subcomponent of
RelationToOneFieldInput)
- RelationFromManyFieldInput
- WorkflowRelationFieldInput
- etc.
+ remove all effects
+ migrate to the latest APIs
+ make a pass on re-renders to remove them completely (we likely need to
use a bit more familyStates here)
Prepare for better version upgrade system + split admin panel into two
permissions + fix GraphQL generation detection
---------
Co-authored-by: ehconitin <nitinkoche03@gmail.com>
Workspace Member will get their own record page in the future.
This PR lays backend changes to prepare for this:
- Settings most fields on WorkspaceMember as system fields
- Renaming workspaceMember/workspaceMemberId to
forWorkspaceMember/forWorkspaceMemberId as it conflicts with the morph
relationship, if we want to be able to add a workspace member as
favorite
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/410
- Added `openRecordIn` column in the `view` entity, which is set to
`SIDE_PANEL` by default
- Created a new option inside the view option dropdown to be able to set
`openRecordIn`
- Updated all record show page openings to reflect the setting behavior
- For `workflow`, `workflowVersion` and `workflowRun` (what I call
workflow objects), we want the default view `openRecordIn` to be set to
`RECORD_PAGE`. When seeding the views for the new workspaces, we set
`openRecordIn` to `RECORD_PAGE` for workflow objects. Since the workflow
objects views `openRecordIn` will be set to the default value
`SIDE_PANEL` for the existing workspaces when the sync metadata runs, I
created a script to run in the 0.43 update to update this value.
- Updated `closeCommandMenu` because of problems introduced by the
animate presence wrapper around the command menu. We now reset the
states at the end of the animation.
Note: We want to be able to open all workflow objects pages in the side
panel, but this requires some refactoring of the workflow module. For
now @Bonapara wanted to allow the possibility to change the
`openRecordIn` setting to `SIDE_PANEL` even for the workflows even if
it's buggy and not ready for the moment. Since this is an experimental
feature, it shouldn't cause too many problems.
This PR is simple, it creates states for record sort, mirroring record
filter states.
It also implements RecordSortsComponentInstanceContext everywhere
RecordFiltersComponentInstanceContext is used.
This could be later merged into a common RecordContext concept but we
first need to decide how to handle the existing ContextStore and
RecordIndexContext and ideally end up with a unique context (or a
context provider component that wraps in all those contexts at once).
Some bugs are already present on main when trying to delete a sort, they
will be fixed in the next PRs.
## Context
With the new permissions system, we now need to hide some items from the
settings navigation and gate some routes so they can't be accessed
directly.
To avoid having to set permission gates in all the component pages, I'm
introducing wrapper at the route level and in the Navigation. This is
not required and is mostly for pages that are strictly mapped to a
single permission, for the rest we still need to use the different hooks
manually but it should avoid a bit of boilerplate for most of the cases.
- currentUserWorkspaceState to access settingsPermissions
- SettingsProtectedRouteWrapper in the router that can take a
settingFeature or a featureFlag as a gate logic, if the currentUser does
not have access to the settingFeature or the featureFlag is not enabled
they will be redirected to the profile page.
- SettingsNavigationItemWrapper & SettingsNavigationSectionWrapper. The
former will check the same logic as SettingsProtectedRouteWrapper and
not display the item if needed. The later will check if all
SettingsNavigationItemWrapper are not visible and hide itself if that's
the case.
- useHasSettingsPermission to get a specific permission state for the
current user
- useSettingsPermissionMap to get a map of all permissions with their
values for the current user
- useFeatureFlagsMap same but for featureFlags
In this huge (sorry!) PR:
- introducing objectMetadataItem in contextStore instead of
objectMetadataId which is more convenient
- splitting some big hooks into smaller parts to avoid re-renders
- removing Effects to avoid re-renders (especially onViewChange)
- making the view prefetch separate from favorites to avoid re-renders
- making the view prefetch load a state and add selectors on top of it
to avoir re-renders
As a result, the performance is WAY better (I suspect the favorite
implementation to trigger a lot of re-renders unfortunately).
However, we are still facing a random app freeze on view creation. I
could not investigate the root cause. As this seems to be already there
in the precedent release, we can move forward but this seems a urgent
follow up to me ==> EDIT: I've found the root cause after a few ours of
deep dive... an infinite loop in RecordTableNoRecordGroupBodyEffect...
prastoin edit: close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10253
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
# Introduction
While importing records encountering missing expected fields when
writting a fragment from apollo cache
## Updates
### 1/ `createdBy` Default value
When inserting in cache in create single or many we will now make
optimistic behavior on the createdBy value
### 2/ `createRecordInCache` dynamically create `recordGrqlFields`
When creating an entry in cache, we will now dynamically generate fields
to be written in the fragment instead of expecting all of them. As by
nature record could be partial
### 3/ Strictly typed `RecordGqlFields`
# Conclusion
closes#9927
Introduce isCustomDomainEnabled field in Workspace entity to manage
custom domain activation. Update related services, types, and logic to
validate and toggle the custom domain's status dynamically based on its
current state. This ensures accurate domain configurations are reflected
across the system.
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR essentially removes the usage of filterDefinition.type, by
replacing it with fieldMetadataItem.type derivation. Thus allowing to
completely remove filterDefinition later on.
In computeFilterRecordGqlOperationFilter, emptyOperationFilter is now
returned before going into the big switch case. This avoids repeating
the same exact call to getEmptyRecordGqlOperationFilter for each type.
Fixed some tests that need
getJestMetadataAndApolloMocksAndActionMenuWrapper to have record filters
properly working with the new implementation. We'll probably want to
refactor the record context store, record index context, etc.
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
At the moment when updating any record cache occurence, we will build a
fragment that will expect all of the object metadata item fields to be
provided.
Which result in the following traces: ( in the video companies aren't
fetch with companyId and other missing fields )
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56eab7c1-8f01-45ff-8f5d-78737b788b92
By definition as we're using graphql we might not request every record's
fields each time we wanna consume them.
In this way we will now dynamically compute or expect depending on the
CRUD operation specific fields to be written in the cache, and not all
of them
Tested all optimistic and failure management use cases
## Covering cache
Added coverage only for the `deleteOne` and `deleteMany` hooks, it cover
only the record record cache and not its relations hydratation ( for the
moment )
## Why not closing #9927
Unless I'm mistaken everything done here have fixed the same logs/traces
issue for updates and deletion but not creation.
Which means we still need to investigate the mass upload from import and
prefillRecord behavior
In a nutshell: went over each `updateRecordFromCache` calls, still need
to do all `createRecordInCache` calls
related to #9927
## Conlusion
Sorry for the big PR should have ejected into a specific one for the
`MinimalRecord` refactor
Will also continue covering others hooks later in my week as for the
`deleteOne`
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
More progress on translations:
- Migrate from translations.io to crowdin
- Optimize performance and robustness
- Set workspaceMember/user locale upon signup
# Content
- Introduce the `workspaceUrls` property. It contains two
sub-properties: `customUrl, subdomainUrl`. These endpoints are used to
access the workspace. Even if the `workspaceUrls` is invalid for
multiple reasons, the `subdomainUrl` remains valid.
- Introduce `ResolveField` workspaceEndpoints to avoid unnecessary URL
computation on the frontend part.
- Add a `forceSubdomainUrl` to avoid custom URL using a query parameter
- Do not render a source handle for the leaf nodes
- Upgrade the `@xyflow/react` library
| Before | After |
|--------|--------|
| 
| 
|
## Other options considered
React Flow exposes a hook to get the connections of the current node. I
tried to use this hook – which makes things way simpler – but I couldn't
find a way to make it work in Storybook. I had two options: 1. Set up
React Flow to render the nodes properly, 2. Mock the hook in Storybook.
The first option was hard to achieve as the `<Reactflow />` component
renders a whole flow, and it doesn't play well with the idea of
rendering a single node in a story.
The second option seemed overkill as mocking modules with Storybook is
not straightforward. See
https://storybook.js.org/docs/writing-stories/mocking-data-and-modules/mocking-modules.
I chose to keep the initial version of my code, written before I spot a
function simplifying the code. We can give it a look another time.
