Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8760
## Context
Index names are based on table names and column names, which means
renaming an object (or a field) should also trigger a recompute of index
names. As of today it raises a bug where you can't create an object with
a name that was previously used.
I also took the occasion to refactor a bit the part where we create and
update (after renaming) relations. Basically the only relations we want
to affect are standard relations so I've aligned the logic with
sync-metadata which uses standardId as a source of truth to simplify the
code.
Note: We don't create index for custom relations
Next step should be to do that and update that code to update the index
name as well. Also note that we need to update the sync-metadata logic
for that as well
Currently when renaming an object, we execute
```
await this.fieldMetadataRepository
.findOneByOrFail({
name: existingObjectMetadata.nameSingular,
label: existingObjectMetadata.labelSingular,
objectMetadataId: relatedObject.id,
workspaceId: workspaceId,
})
```
to find the standard relation fields.
This would throw an error if the label solely was update beforehand
without updating the name too: in that case we will not have migrated
the label of the standard relation fields (which is maybe a mistake?
@Weiko wdyt?).
Let's remove it.
Refactoring update of standard relations when a custom object is
renamed, after observing occasional issues.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
### Description
- This PR has as the base branch the TWNTY-5491 branch, but we also had
to include updates from the main branch, and currently, there are
conflicts in the TWNTY-5491, that cause errors on typescript in this PR,
so, we can update once the conflicts are resolved on the base branch,
but the functionality can be reviewed anyway
- We Implemented a new layout of object details settings and new, the
data is auto-saved in `Settings `tab of object detail
- There is no indication to the user that data are saved automatically
in the design, currently we are disabling the form
### Demo\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4198c0aa54b5450780a570ceee574838?sid=b4ef0a42-2d41-435f-9f5f-1b16816939f7>
### Refs
#TWNTY-5491
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
## Context
Latest refactoring broke the findOneWithinWorkspace method which is
called during object update, I'm simply reverting this change.
object-metadata-relation.service was naively computing a namePlural
based on the nameSingular while we already had that info in the DB...
Should fix some issues with renaming as well because the original field
was not computed with the right name.
## Context
ObjectMetadataService became quite large and handles too many
responsibilities. I'm trying to refactor a bit this part in preparation
of a larger work that will combine object-metadata services and
sync-metadata logic
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_ICONS that can be reused in relation
creation to refer to a standard object icon.
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELD_IDS that can be used with an object
name to get its standard field ids.
- Moved migration, record and relation creations to dedicated services,
refactored to improve performances and readability
- Refactored some validation logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
