## Context
Following this https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/4199
This has not been fully implemented, after 5months of dead code I'm
removing the feature for the time being until we re-prioritise the
feature (unlikely during these next 6 months) to keep the codebase a bit
cleaner (no need to maintain dead features)
Feel free to reopen / revert this PR once feature is ready
## Test
locally after importing emails
Fix#4244 and #4356
This pull request introduces the new "view groups" capability, enabling
the reordering, hiding, and showing of columns in Kanban mode. The core
enhancement includes the addition of a new entity named `ViewGroup`,
which manages column behaviors and interactions.
#### Key Changes:
1. **ViewGroup Entity**:
The newly added `ViewGroup` entity is responsible for handling the
organization and state of columns.
This includes:
- The ability to reorder columns.
- The option to hide or show specific columns based on user preferences.
#### Conclusion:
This PR adds a significant new feature that enhances the flexibility of
Kanban views through the `ViewGroup` entity.
We'll later add the view group logic to table view too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Steps to test
1. Run metadata migrations
2. Run sync-metadata on your workspace
3. Enable the following feature flags:
IS_SEARCH_ENABLED
IS_QUERY_RUNNER_TWENTY_ORM_ENABLED
IS_WORKSPACE_MIGRATED_FOR_SEARCH
4. Type Cmd + K and search anything
- create a workflow run every time a workflow is triggered in
not_started status. This status will be helpful later for once workflows
will be scheduled
- update run status once workflow starts running
- complete status once the workflow finished running
- add a failed status if an error occurs
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Refactor connected account module
- Move blocklist into it's own module
- Move contact-creation-manager into it's own module
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR was first here to fix the issue related to ticket #5004, after
some testing it seems that changing the name of a relation is actually
properly working, if we rename `ONE-TO-MANY` side, the only things that
is going to be updated is the FieldMetadata as the `joinColumn` is
stored on the opposite object.
For `MANY-TO-ONE` relations, the `joinColumn` migration is properly
generated. We need to take care that if we rename a side of a relation,
sometimes the opposite side doesn't have `inverseSideFieldKey`
implemented and used by default the name of the opposite object, so this
is going to throw an error as the field can't be found in the object.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
In this PR, I'm refactoring the messaging module into smaller pieces
that have **ONE** responsibility: import messages, clean messages,
handle message participant creation, instead of having ~30 modules (1
per service, jobs, cron, ...). This is mandatory to start introducing
drivers (gmails, office365, ...) IMO. It is too difficult to enforce
common interfaces as we have too many interfaces (30 modules...). All
modules should not be exposed
Right now, we have services that are almost functions:
do-that-and-this.service.ts / do-that-and-this.module.ts
I believe we should have something more organized at a high level and it
does not matter that much if we have a bit of code duplicates.
Note that the proposal is not fully implemented in the current PR that
has only focused on messaging folder (biggest part)
Here is the high level proposal:
- connected-account: token-refresher
- blocklist
- messaging: message-importer, message-cleaner, message-participants,
... (right now I'm keeping a big messaging-common but this will
disappear see below)
- calendar: calendar-importer, calendar-cleaner, ...
Consequences:
1) It's OK to re-implement several times some things. Example:
- error handling in connected-account, messaging, and calendar instead
of trying to unify. They are actually different error handling. The only
things that might be in common is the GmailError => CommonError parsing
and I'm not even sure it makes a lot of sense as these 3 apis might have
different format actually
- auto-creation. Calendar and Messaging could actually have different
rules
2) **We should not have circular dependencies:**
- I believe this was the reason why we had so many modules, to be able
to cherry pick the one we wanted to avoid circular deps. This is not the
right approach IMO, we need architect the whole messaging by defining
high level blocks that won't have circular dependencies by design. If we
encounter one, we should rethink and break the block in a way that makes
sense.
- ex: connected-account.resolver is not in the same module as
token-refresher. ==> connected-account.resolver => message-importer (as
we trigger full sync job when we connect an account) => token-refresher
(as we refresh token on message import).
connected-account.resolver and token-refresher both in connected-account
folder but should be in different modules. Otherwise it's a circular
dependency. It does not mean that we should create 1 module per service
as it was done before
In a nutshell: The code needs to be thought in term of reponsibilities
and in a way that enforce high level interfaces (and avoid circular
dependencies)
Bonus: As you can see, this code is also removing a lot of code because
of the removal of many .module.ts (also because I'm removing the sync
scripts v2 feature flag end removing old code)
Bonus: I have prefixed services name with Messaging to improve dev xp.
GmailErrorHandler could be different between MessagingGmailErrorHandler
and CalendarGmailErrorHandler for instance
This PR is updating all object metadata entities with the new
decorators, and deleting the old ones.
This way we can use the new TwentyORM with all the standard objects.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Refactored the code to introduce two different concepts:
- AuditLogs (immutable, raw data)
- TimelineActivities (user-friendly, transformed data)
Still some work needed:
- Add message, files, calendar events to timeline (~2 hours if done
naively)
- Refactor repository to try to abstract concept when we can (tbd, wait
for Twenty ORM)
- Introduce ability to display child timelines on parent timeline with
filtering (~2 days)
- Improve UI: add links to open note/task, improve diff display, etc
(half a day)
- Decide the path forward for Task vs Notes: either introduce a new
field type "Record Type" and start going into that direction ; or split
in two objects?
- Trigger updates when a field is changed (will be solved by real-time /
websockets: 2 weeks)
- Integrate behavioral events (1 day for POC, 1 week for
clean/documented)
<img width="1248" alt="Screenshot 2024-04-12 at 09 24 49"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/6399865/9428db1a-ab2b-492c-8b0b-d4d9a36e81fa">
* feat: wip refactor default-value
* feat: health check to migrate default value
* fix: tests
* fix: refactor defaultValue to make it more clean
* fix: unit tests
* fix: front-end default value
