# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
## Context
- Removing search* integration tests instead of fixing them because they
will be replaced by global search very soon
- Fixed billing + add missing seeds to make them work
- Fixed integration tests not using consistently the correct "test" db
- Fixed ci not running the with-db-reset configuration due to nx
configuration being used twice for different level of the command
- Enriched .env.test
- Fixed parts where exceptions were not thrown properly and not caught
by exception handler to convert to 400 when needed
- Refactored feature flag service that had 2 different implementations
in lab and admin panel + added tests
- Fixed race condition when migrations are created at the same timestamp
and doing the same type of operation, in this case object deletion could
break because table could be deleted earlier than its relations
- Fixed many integration tests that were not up to date since the CI has
been broken for a while
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
## Context
Enum are named after this pattern
`${schema}_${tableName}_${columnName}_enum` however now that we allowed
table name update, we need to make sure their enums are renamed as well.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8760
## Context
Index names are based on table names and column names, which means
renaming an object (or a field) should also trigger a recompute of index
names. As of today it raises a bug where you can't create an object with
a name that was previously used.
I also took the occasion to refactor a bit the part where we create and
update (after renaming) relations. Basically the only relations we want
to affect are standard relations so I've aligned the logic with
sync-metadata which uses standardId as a source of truth to simplify the
code.
Note: We don't create index for custom relations
Next step should be to do that and update that code to update the index
name as well. Also note that we need to update the sync-metadata logic
for that as well
Currently when renaming an object, we execute
```
await this.fieldMetadataRepository
.findOneByOrFail({
name: existingObjectMetadata.nameSingular,
label: existingObjectMetadata.labelSingular,
objectMetadataId: relatedObject.id,
workspaceId: workspaceId,
})
```
to find the standard relation fields.
This would throw an error if the label solely was update beforehand
without updating the name too: in that case we will not have migrated
the label of the standard relation fields (which is maybe a mistake?
@Weiko wdyt?).
Let's remove it.
Refactoring update of standard relations when a custom object is
renamed, after observing occasional issues.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
### Description
- This PR has as the base branch the TWNTY-5491 branch, but we also had
to include updates from the main branch, and currently, there are
conflicts in the TWNTY-5491, that cause errors on typescript in this PR,
so, we can update once the conflicts are resolved on the base branch,
but the functionality can be reviewed anyway
- We Implemented a new layout of object details settings and new, the
data is auto-saved in `Settings `tab of object detail
- There is no indication to the user that data are saved automatically
in the design, currently we are disabling the form
### Demo\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4198c0aa54b5450780a570ceee574838?sid=b4ef0a42-2d41-435f-9f5f-1b16816939f7>
### Refs
#TWNTY-5491
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
## Context
Latest refactoring broke the findOneWithinWorkspace method which is
called during object update, I'm simply reverting this change.
object-metadata-relation.service was naively computing a namePlural
based on the nameSingular while we already had that info in the DB...
Should fix some issues with renaming as well because the original field
was not computed with the right name.
## Context
ObjectMetadataService became quite large and handles too many
responsibilities. I'm trying to refactor a bit this part in preparation
of a larger work that will combine object-metadata services and
sync-metadata logic
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_ICONS that can be reused in relation
creation to refer to a standard object icon.
- Created a STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELD_IDS that can be used with an object
name to get its standard field ids.
- Moved migration, record and relation creations to dedicated services,
refactored to improve performances and readability
- Refactored some validation logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
