# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Implement date formatting per workspace member settings
We'll need another round to maybe initialize all workspaces on the
default settings.
For now the default behavior is to take system settings if nothing is
found in DB.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Closes#6431
- create new field `activationStatus`
- create migration commands
- add logic to update `activationStatus` on workspace activation and on
stripe subscriptionStatus change
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR refactors the ORM-Manager to simplify and unify the datasource
creation. I'm deprecating all usages if InjectWorkspaceDatasource and
InjectWorkspaceRepository as we can't be sure they are up-to-date
## Bug Description
We are facing a bug in case recaptcha is enabled.
To reproduce:
- Create your recaptcha: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/about/
- update your server .env with the following variables:
```
CAPTCHA_SECRET_KEY=REPLACE_ME
CAPTCHA_SITE_KEY=REPLACE_ME
CAPTCHA_DRIVER=google-recaptcha
```
- Go to the login page, enter an existing user email and hit 'Reset your
password'.
- Add a console.log in emailPasswordResetLink in auth.resolver.ts to get
the token that would be sent by email if you don't have the mailer setup
- Browse: /reset-password/{passwordToken}
- Update the password:
<img width="1446" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dd5b077f-293e-451a-8630-22d24ac66c42">
- See that the token is invalid
You should see two calls in your developer network tab. A successful one
to update the password and another to log you in. This 2nd call
(Challenge) does not have the captcha token provided. It should be
## Fix
- Refreshing the token on page load
- providing it to the Challenge graphql call
### Overview
This PR builds upon #5153, adding the ability to get a repository for
custom objects. The `entitySchema` is now generated for both standard
and custom objects based on metadata stored in the database instead of
the decorated `WorkspaceEntity` in the code. This change ensures that
standard objects with custom fields and relations can also support
custom objects.
### Implementation Details
#### Key Changes:
- **Dynamic Schema Generation:** The `entitySchema` for standard and
custom objects is now dynamically generated from the metadata stored in
the database. This shift allows for greater flexibility and
adaptability, particularly for standard objects with custom fields and
relations.
- **Custom Object Repository Retrieval:** A repository for a custom
object can be retrieved using `TwentyORMManager` based on the object's
name. Here's an example of how this can be achieved:
```typescript
const repository = await this.twentyORMManager.getRepository('custom');
/*
* `repository` variable will be typed as follows, ensuring that standard
fields and relations are properly typed:
* const repository: WorkspaceRepository<CustomWorkspaceEntity & {
* [key: string]: any;
* }>
*/
const res = await repository.find({});
```
Fix#6179
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
We call convertExceptionToGraphQLError in the exception handler for http
exceptions but we don't take into account those that already are
graphqlErrors and because of that the logic of convertExceptionToGraphql
is to fallback to a 500.
Now if the exception is a BaseGraphqlError (custom graphql error we
throw in the code), we throw them directly.
BEFORE
<img width="957" alt="Screenshot 2024-07-12 at 15 33 03"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22ddae13-4996-4ad3-8f86-dd17c2922ca8">
AFTER
<img width="923" alt="Screenshot 2024-07-12 at 15 32 01"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d3d6db93-6d28-495c-a4b4-ba4e47d45abd">
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In the longer term, we want to improve the efficiency and reliability of
the sync-metadata command, by choosing an error handling strategy and
paying greater attention to health checks.
In the meantime, this PR adds an option to run the sync-metadata command
on all active workspaces at once.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Refactor calendar modules and some messaging modules to better
organize them by business rules and decouple them
- Work toward a common architecture for the different calendar providers
by introducing interfaces for the drivers
- Modify cron job to use the new sync statuses and stages
Added:
- An "Ask AI" command to the command menu.
- A simple GraphQL resolver that converts the user's question into a
relevant SQL query using an LLM, runs the query, and returns the result.
<img width="428" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-09 at 20 53 09"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/171685816/57127f37-d4a6-498d-b253-733ffa0d209f">
No security concerns have been addressed, this is only a
proof-of-concept and not intended to be enabled in production.
All changes are behind a feature flag called `IS_ASK_AI_ENABLED`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
This PR was first here to fix the issue related to ticket #5004, after
some testing it seems that changing the name of a relation is actually
properly working, if we rename `ONE-TO-MANY` side, the only things that
is going to be updated is the FieldMetadata as the `joinColumn` is
stored on the opposite object.
For `MANY-TO-ONE` relations, the `joinColumn` migration is properly
generated. We need to take care that if we rename a side of a relation,
sometimes the opposite side doesn't have `inverseSideFieldKey`
implemented and used by default the name of the opposite object, so this
is going to throw an error as the field can't be found in the object.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
We have recently deprecated our subscriptionStatus on workspace to
replace it by a check on existing subscription (+ freeAccess
featureFlag) but the logic was not properly implemented
Closes#5748
- Create feature flag
- Add scope `https://www.googleapis.com/auth/profile.emails.read` when
connecting an account
- Get email aliases with google people API, store them in
connectedAccount and refresh them before each message-import
- Update the contact creation logic accordingly
- Refactor
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
querying workspaceMembers may be slow leads to wrong
setNextOnboardingStatus value. So we added a resolved field in workspace
to get workspaceMemberCount directly
- move front `onboardingStatus` computing to server side
- add logic to `useSetNextOnboardingStatus`
- update some missing redirections in
`usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation`
- separate subscriptionStatus from onboardingStatus
This PR introduce a new decorator named `@WorkspaceJoinColumn`, the goal
of this one is to manually declare the join columns inside the workspace
entities, so we don't have to rely on `ObjectRecord` type.
This decorator can be used that way:
```typescript
@WorkspaceRelation({
standardId: ACTIVITY_TARGET_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.company,
type: RelationMetadataType.MANY_TO_ONE,
label: 'Company',
description: 'ActivityTarget company',
icon: 'IconBuildingSkyscraper',
inverseSideTarget: () => CompanyWorkspaceEntity,
inverseSideFieldKey: 'activityTargets',
})
@WorkspaceIsNullable()
company: Relation<CompanyWorkspaceEntity> | null;
// The argument is the name of the relation above
@WorkspaceJoinColumn('company')
companyId: string | null;
```
This PR introduces an `upsert` parameter (along the existing `data`
param) for `createOne` and `createMany` mutations.
When upsert is set to `true`, the function will look for records with
the same id if an id was passed. If not id was passed, it will leverage
the existing duplicate check mechanism to find a duplicate. If a record
is found, then the function will perform an update instead of a create.
Unfortunately I had to remove some nice tests that existing on the args
factory. Those tests where mostly testing the duplication rule
generation logic but through a GraphQL angle. Since I moved the
duplication rule logic to a dedicated service, if I kept the tests but
mocked the service we wouldn't really be testing anything useful. The
right path would be to create new tests for this service that compare
the JSON output and not the GraphQL output but I chose not to work on
this as it's equivalent to rewriting the tests from scratch and I have
other competing priorities.
