# Introduction
This PR contains several SNAPSHOT files explaining big +
While refactoring the Object Model settings page in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10653, encountered a critical
issue when submitting either one or both names with `""` empty string
hard corrupting a workspace.
This motivate this PR reviewing server side validation
I feel like we could share zod schema between front and back
## Refactored server validation
What to expect from Names:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Contains only a-z A-Z and 0-9
- Follows camelCase
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
What to expect from Labels:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive ( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10694
## Creation integrations tests
Created new integrations tests, following
[EachTesting](https://jestjs.io/docs/api#testeachtablename-fn-timeout)
pattern and uses snapshot to assert errors message. These tests cover
several failing use cases and started to implement ones for the happy
path but object metadata item deletion is currently broken unless I'm
mistaken @Weiko is on it
## Notes
- [ ] As we've added new validation rules towards names and labels we
should scan db in order to standardize existing values using either a
migration command or manual check
- [ ] Will review in an other PR the update path, adding integrations
tests and so on
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
### Summary
This PR introduces several integration tests, a mix of manually written
tests and those generated using the `generate-integration-tests` Python
script located in the `scripts` folder.
### Tests Added:
- **Authentication tests**: Validating login, registration, and token
handling.
- **FindMany queries**: Fetching multiple records for all existing
entities that do not require input arguments.
### How the Integration Tests Work:
- A `setupTest` function is called during the Jest test run. This
function initializes a test instance of the application and exposes it
on a dedicated port.
- Since tests are executed in isolated workers, they do not have direct
access to the in-memory app instance. Instead, the tests query the
application through the exposed port.
- A static accessToken is used, this one as a big expiration time so it
will never expire (365 years)
- The queries are executed, and the results are validated against
expected outcomes.
### Current State and Next Steps:
- These tests currently run using the existing development seed data. We
plan to introduce more comprehensive test data using `faker` to improve
coverage.
- At the moment, the only mutation tests implemented are for
authentication. Future updates should include broader mutation testing
for other entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
