# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
## Context
- Removing search* integration tests instead of fixing them because they
will be replaced by global search very soon
- Fixed billing + add missing seeds to make them work
- Fixed integration tests not using consistently the correct "test" db
- Fixed ci not running the with-db-reset configuration due to nx
configuration being used twice for different level of the command
- Enriched .env.test
- Fixed parts where exceptions were not thrown properly and not caught
by exception handler to convert to 400 when needed
- Refactored feature flag service that had 2 different implementations
in lab and admin panel + added tests
- Fixed race condition when migrations are created at the same timestamp
and doing the same type of operation, in this case object deletion could
break because table could be deleted earlier than its relations
- Fixed many integration tests that were not up to date since the CI has
been broken for a while
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
This PR contains several SNAPSHOT files explaining big +
While refactoring the Object Model settings page in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10653, encountered a critical
issue when submitting either one or both names with `""` empty string
hard corrupting a workspace.
This motivate this PR reviewing server side validation
I feel like we could share zod schema between front and back
## Refactored server validation
What to expect from Names:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Contains only a-z A-Z and 0-9
- Follows camelCase
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
What to expect from Labels:
- Plural and singular have to be different ( case insensitive and
trimmed check )
- Is not empty => Is not too short ( 1 )
- Is not too long ( 63 )
- Is case insensitive ( fooBar and fOoBar now rejected )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10694
## Creation integrations tests
Created new integrations tests, following
[EachTesting](https://jestjs.io/docs/api#testeachtablename-fn-timeout)
pattern and uses snapshot to assert errors message. These tests cover
several failing use cases and started to implement ones for the happy
path but object metadata item deletion is currently broken unless I'm
mistaken @Weiko is on it
## Notes
- [ ] As we've added new validation rules towards names and labels we
should scan db in order to standardize existing values using either a
migration command or manual check
- [ ] Will review in an other PR the update path, adding integrations
tests and so on
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/393
- enforcing object-records permission checks in resolvers for now. we
will move the logic to a lower level asap
- add integration tests that will still be useful when we have moved the
logic
- introduce guest seeded role to test limited permissions on
object-records
In this PR
- closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/313
- adding permission gates on workspace settings and security settings
- adding integration tests for each of the protected setting and
security
## Context
We recently introduced a createMany on the field metadata service to
improve seeding performances. This broke relation metadata creation
because it was using a method with the same name that was inherited from
TypeOrmQueryService.
# This PR
- Addressing #3644
- Migrates the `DELETE /rest/*` endpoint to use TwentyORM
- Factorizes common middleware logic into a common module
---------
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
Solves [ https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/214 ]
**TLDR**
Add unit and integration tests to Billing. First approach to run jest
integration tests directly from VSCode.
**In order to run the unit tests:**
Run unit test using the CLI or with the jest extension directly from
VSCode.
**In order to run the integration tests:**
Ensure that your database has the billingTables. If that's not the case,
migrate the database with IS_BILLING_ENABLED set to true:
` npx nx run twenty-server:test:integration
test/integration/billing/suites/billing-controller.integration-spec.ts`
**Doing:**
- Unit test on transformSubscriptionEventToSubscriptionItem
- More tests cases in billingController integration tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#9151
## Description
This PR automatically sets a workspace's logo based on the user's work
email domain during signup. When a user creates a new workspace using
their work email (e.g., @airbnb.com), the system will fetch and set
their company logo from twenty-icons.com as the default workspace logo.
## Implementation Details
- Added a new `CompanyEnrichmentService` to handle company-related data
enrichment
- Created a modular architecture that supports future enrichment
features (e.g., company name, details)
- Integrated with existing work email detection
- Maintains user ability to override the logo later
## Testing
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f7855c99-462a-4053-9e52-29649e954275
I tested the following scenarios:
- Signing up with a work email (e.g., @company.com) → Logo is
automatically set
- Signing up with a personal email (e.g., @gmail.com) → No logo is set
- User can still upload a custom logo after automatic setting
## Technical Notes
- Uses existing `isWorkEmail` utility
- Structured for future extensibility (additional company data
enrichment)
- No breaking changes to existing functionality
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Run the CI integrationin sync mode
and add the option to run it without db reset
cleaning all the useless integration test
---------
Co-authored-by: guillim <guillaume@twenty.com>
### Summary
This PR introduces several integration tests, a mix of manually written
tests and those generated using the `generate-integration-tests` Python
script located in the `scripts` folder.
### Tests Added:
- **Authentication tests**: Validating login, registration, and token
handling.
- **FindMany queries**: Fetching multiple records for all existing
entities that do not require input arguments.
### How the Integration Tests Work:
- A `setupTest` function is called during the Jest test run. This
function initializes a test instance of the application and exposes it
on a dedicated port.
- Since tests are executed in isolated workers, they do not have direct
access to the in-memory app instance. Instead, the tests query the
application through the exposed port.
- A static accessToken is used, this one as a big expiration time so it
will never expire (365 years)
- The queries are executed, and the results are validated against
expected outcomes.
### Current State and Next Steps:
- These tests currently run using the existing development seed data. We
plan to introduce more comprehensive test data using `faker` to improve
coverage.
- At the moment, the only mutation tests implemented are for
authentication. Future updates should include broader mutation testing
for other entities.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
