This PR adds a useCheckIsSoftDeleteFilter hook instead of the
undocumented in-place logic to retrieve the soft delete filter.
Also took the opportunity to refactor a recent change of @prastoin with
it.
Split VariantFilterChip into SoftDeleteFilterChip and RecordFilterChip
to separate concerns about this soft delete filtering.
This PR progressively introduces fieldMetadataItemUsedInDropdown instead
of filterDefinitionUsedInDropdown where most easy to replace.
This allows to use `fieldMetadataItemUsedInDropdown.id` instead of
`filterDefinition.fieldMetadataId`, which is one easy dependency to
remove on filter definition.
We still derive filterDefinition instead of fully replacing it, because
it will be easier to remove RecordFilterDefinition usage in a bottom-up
approach instead.
In multiple components of the filter dropdown, we try to replace
filterDefinition by fieldMetadataItem derivation : Icon, label, id,
type, etc.
We also introduce the usage of subFieldNameUsedInDropdown instead of
storing it dynamically on filterDefinition, for handling filtering on
composite sub fields.
The method `formatFieldMetadataItemAsFilterDefinition()` that is used to
derive filterDefinition from fieldMetadataItem is what was being used
originally to create the availableFilterDefinition state. (That is
already removed)
Fixed associated unit tests accordingly.
# Introduction
When we create a new `view` from record table that has relation such as
opportunities.
Encountered invariant conditions:
## Unknown fiel `__typename`
`Should never occur, encountered unknown fields __typename in
objectMetadaItem viewGroup`,
### Fixed by ignoring unknown internal fields
## Provided both relation `view` and `viewId`
`Should never provide relation mutation through anything else than the
fieldId e.g companyId and not company, encountered: view`
### Fixed by sending only `viewId` to `createManyRecords` in
`usePersistViewGroupRecords.ts`
Implements filtering, ordering and cursor filtering for the hook
useCombinedFindManyRecords, because it was not implemented, which was
misleading because variables could be passed to it.
The difficult part was to make sure that the cursor filtering was
working, both before and after a cursor, because it was only hard coded
for last cursor (equivalent to after).
The duplicate limit parameter in the type RecordGqlOperationVariables
was merged into one limit parameter, because it was making the developer
guess how both could be handled.
This single limit parameter can be used for either : general limit
without cursor, first records from after cursor, last records until
before cursor. Since those cases are exclusive it's better to have only
one limit parameter and have an internal logic handling those cases.
Tests were added on the relevant parts, especially
useCombinedFindManyRecordsQueryVariables which requires its own unit
test to handle this cursor + limit logic.
Record show page pagination was tested to make sure removing the
duplicate limit parameter had no impact.
# Introduction
Added the `RecordAction` destroy multiple record
## Repro
Select multiples `deletedRecords`, you should be able to see the
`Destroy` pinned CTA ( iso short label with the destroy one ), open
control panel and fin new CTA `Permanently delete records`
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31ee8738-9d61-4dec-9a1f-41bb6785e018
## TODO
- [ ] Gain granularity within tests to assert the action should be
registered only when filtering by deleted
## Conclusion
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/110
With the introduction of dropdown focus id, the table header cell filter
dropdown wasn't taken into account by this new system that prevents
multiple dropdowns from conflicting.
The fix was to just add a dropdown focus id when opening the dropdown.
There was also a bug with the hotkey scope which was staying on table
hotkey scope, thus triggering table hotkeys, this PR also fixes that.
The global record filter refactor will derive everything at runtime from
objectMetadataItemsState, thus removing the need for a filter definition
concept.
Here we don't yet remove available filter definition usage but we
replace the available filter definitions states, we now derive the same
value from objectMetadataItemsState.
This will allow us to progressively remove the usage of the concept of
filter definition, at the end it will then be easy to just remove from
the codebase because nothing will use it anymore.
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Fixes
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1333822806504247467
In this PR:
- Make the workflow step title input readonly when the visualizer is in
readonly mode
- Make all the fields of the Update Record and Delete Record readonly
when the visualizer is in readonly mode
- Create stories for the Create Record, Updated Record and Delete Record
actions; I'm checking for the default mode and several variants of the
disabled mode
- Set up mocks for the workflows and use them in msw handlers
Follow up:
- We use `readonly` and `disabled` alternatively; these are two
different states when talking about a HTML `<input />` element. I think
we should settle on a single word.
- Refactor the `<WorkflowSingleRecordPicker />` component to behave as
other selects
| Current component | Should look like |
|--------|--------|
| 
| 
|
This PR doesn't remove or change the current behavior of the filter
definition used in filter dropdown, but adds a parallel code path where
we set the field metadata item used in filter dropdown, which is enough
to replace the filter definition.
The goal at the end is to compute dynamically the equivalent of filter
definition where needed, by deriving from objectMetadataItems global
state + fieldMetadataItemId used in dropdown, that way we don't create
any other source of truth for the concept of filter definition and
everything is easier to work with, especially with advanced filters.
The general spirit is that it's always better to derive everywhere from
a unique state as much as possible, and only create the equivalent of
selectors where needed that will only take the relevant chunk of state
for the small zone of the code operating some reading/writing.
- Added utils and hooks to get a FieldMetadataItem more easily
- Removed some properties from RecordFilterDefinition (the easiest to
remove) and replaced them with a dynamic logic, deriving what's needed
where it is needed
- Added a new fieldMetadataItemIdUsedInDropdownComponentState that is
set in parallel of filterDefinitionUsedInDropdown (to prepare the
removal of filter definition used in dropdown)
- Fixed some stories
---------
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
The optimistic effect for record creations and updates wasn't working
properly for `and filters` without explicit `and`.
The problem was located inside `isRecordMatchingFilter` which didn't
consider implicit `and filters` as `and filters`. This caused queries to
be updated by the optimistic effect even if they didn't match the root
query filter.
I also removed `fetchPolicy: 'cache-and-network'` from a query. This was
a temporary fix for this issue.
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Implementing the Outlook icon for CreatedBy, only for emails.
Not in this PR original scope : The similar feature for calendar created
records. Since it was straightforward, I added it to the scope of this
PR.
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/252
# Introduction
This PR is highly related to previous optimistic cache refactor:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9881
Here we've added some logic within the
`triggerUpdateRelationsOptimisticEffect` which will now run if given
recordInput `deletedAt` field is defined.
If deletion, we will iterate over all the fields searching for
`RELATION` for which deletion might implies necessity to detach the
relation
## Known troubleshooting ( also on main )
We might have to refactor the `prefillRecord` to spread and
overrides`inputValue` over defaultOne as inputValue could be a partial
one for more info please a look to
# Conclusion
Any suggestions are welcomed !
fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9580
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
~~this could be cool for the updateRecordFromCache to return the updated
record, so we could consume its return value more explicitly such as
`updatedRecordValue`~~
In fact this is nitpick as it would really be the same than returning
the received params
## Fixes duplicated optimistic cache upsert
<img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/289f4801-5b67-4e4e-a87b-a512deb5180c"
width="300px" height="300px">
We were before comparing the previously `cachedRecord` which is now, not
the latest as the optimistic is (should) be working successfully since
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9881
## Reproduction
1- Open any Company
2- Attach an Opportunity it should appears only once
3bis- If you revert the last branch commit it will appear duplicated
Related to #9580
# Introduction
It seems like optimistic caching isn't working as expected for any
record relation mutation, CREATE UPDATE DELETE.
It should not have an impact on the destroy
We included a new `computeOptimisticRecordInput` that will calculate if
a relation is added or detach.
Updated the `triggerCreateRecordsOptimisticEffect` signature we should
have a look to each of its call to determine if it should be checking
cache or not
Related to #9580
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
### Context
[Issue 9019](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9019) opens by
user having domain name not imported while importing through CSV.
@samyakpiya (thank you for your investigation !) has tested various
domain imports and has reported issue with its import test. Issues that
no longer exist : when I test your import, I get all records imported.
### Solution
- Remove "Link label" (cf screenshot - before fix) composite field in
matching options, not used in front that could mislead the user.
<img width="300" alt="Screenshot 2025-01-28 at 15 39 18"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0ea24d9e-b339-42f3-b8d9-e271b33dbcfd"
/>
- Check links type fields validity in "Validate data" step
closes#9019
---------
Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
# Introduction
At the moment the relationships are inferred from the record data
structure instead of its metadatas
We should refactor the code that computes or not the necessity to detach
a relation on a mutation
We've refactored the `isObjectRecordConnection` method to be consuming a
`relationDefintion` instead of "typeChecking" at the runtime the data
structure using zod validation schema
Related to #9580
This PR implements a first real use case, now currentRecordFilters
component state acts as the global record filter reference.
It is set by the view initially and can be reset to view filters state
at any point.
This new state is also modified by two new upsertRecordFilter /
removeRecordFilter hooks that will be drop-in replacement of the actual
upsertCombinedViewFilter and removeCombinediewFilter hooks.
This PR implements the logic to manipulate record filters but only reads
it to make the table find many request, all other features are still
relying on the old view filter implementation.
Advanced filters are ignored because they are hidden and because this
effort is made precisely to allow the completion of the advanced filters
feature.
# Introduction
By initially fixing this Fixes#9381, discovered other behavior that
have been fix.
Overall we encountered a bug that corrupts a workspace and make the
browser + api crash
This issue https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/25
suggests a refactor that has final save button instead of auto-save
## `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` form default value
The default value resulted in being undefined, resulting in react hook
form `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` is required field error.
### Fix
Setting default value fallback to `null` as field is `nullable`
## `SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` never triggers form
Unless I'm mistaken in production touching any fields within
`SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` would never trigger form
submission until you also modify `SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm`
fields
### Fix
Provide and apply `onblur` that triggers the form on both
`SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` inputs
## Wrong default `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` on first page render
When landing on the page for the first time, if a custom
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` has been set it won't be computed
within the `PreviewCard`.
Occurs when `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` form default value is
undefined, due to `any` injection.
### Fix
In the `getLabelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` check the
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataIdFormValue` definition, if undefined
fallback to current `objectMetadata` identifier
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Created an new component state
`isRecordEditableNameRenamingComponentState`
- Updated `useCreateNewTableRecord` to open the ShowPage on workflow
creation
- Refactored `RecordEditableName` and its components to remove the
useEffect (This was causing the recordName state to be updated after the
focus on `NavigationDrawerInput`, but we want the text so be selected
after the update).
- Introduced a new component `EditableBreadcrumbItem`
- Created an autosizing text input: This is done by a hack using a span
inside a div and the input position is set to absolute and takes the
size of the div. There are two problems that I didn't manage to fix:
If the text is too long, the title overflows, and the letter spacing is
different between the span and the input creating a small offset.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4aa1e177-7458-4691-b0c8-96567b482206
New text input component:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/94565546-fe2b-457d-a1d8-907007e0e2ce
This PR fixes a problem with how TypeORM handles date without time.
A date without time that is stored in PostgreSQL database as `date` type
gets returned as an ISO string date with a timezone that can shift its
date part in an unwanted way.
In short DB stores `2025-01-01`, TypeORM query builder returns
`2024-12-31T23:00:00Z` which gets parsed as `2024-12-31` on the front
end field.
We don't want to handle timezone here because we are manipulating a date
without its time part, so this PR adds a step that counteracts what
TypeORM does and returns `2025-01-01T00:00:00.000Z` so that the front
can parse it correctly.
@Weiko We might want to check other places of the backend where date
types are returned by TypeORM, we might have the same problem, this PR
only fixes it for updateOne resolver return.
- Fixed date persist on frontend which was shifting the date to a
different day due to timezone issue
- Fixed date returned by the backend update logic, which was shifting
the date by the timezone offset (so this PR adds back the offset so that
it stays at 00:00:00Z time)
