Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-6260](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-6260).
This ticket was imported from:
[TWNTY-6260](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6260)
---
### Description
This is the second PR on TWNTY-6260 which handles data migration of
Phone field to Phones field.\
\
How to Test?\
Follow the below steps:
- On the main branch,
- go to
`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm-seeds/workspace/people.ts`
and change any person's phone number to a string with characters for
example: "test invalid phone", and then reset the DB.
- reset database using `npx nx database:reset twenty-server`
- This is to make sure that invalid numbers will be handled properly. We
should use the invalid value itself to avoid removing data and see how
the behavior is on the front end. should be the same as in the main, the
display shows the invalid value, but the input is empty when you click,
and then you can update.
- Checkout to `TWNTY-6260-phone-migration` branch
- Rebuild typescript using `npx nx build twenty-server`
- Run command `yarn command:prod upgrade-0.32` to do migration
- Run both backend and frontend to see the migrated field
### Demo
- **Loom Video:**\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4b9bcb423cee447d8ad09852a83b27da?sid=ed74ecaa-0339-4575-acdc-a863e95e94fd>
### Refs
#6260
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This is the second PR on TWNTY-6261 which handlesdata migration of Email
field to Emails field.\
\
How to Test?\
Firstly make sure that you have completed the testing steps on first PR
then follow the below steps:
- Checkout to TWNTY-6261-emails-migrations branch
- Rebuild typescript using "npx nx build twenty-server"
- Run command "yarn command:prod upgrade-0.25" to do migration\
\
Loom Video:\
<https://www.loom.com/share/f82b8d29f8f64f92abe3c59c01147b45?sid=9f8ccc05-aa38-4c49-b139-fd0823066273>
**Testing Messaging Sync functionality:**
Please watch the below video to see that the synchronization of contacts
is working fine after migrating Email field to Emails field:\
<https://www.loom.com/share/400949464b244272b78c25e338cc6ab2?sid=103f6625-5933-4b99-9825-0fed33782f36>
**Question to the client**
should we rename email to emails here? in the DomainName PR, the name
did not change.
```typescript
@WorkspaceField({
standardId: PERSON_STANDARD_FIELD_IDS.email,
type: FieldMetadataType.EMAILS,
label: 'Email',
description: 'Contact’s Email',
icon: 'IconMail',
})
email: EmailsMetadata;
```
**Test Messaging Sync**
This pr will update messaging sync files so the changes shouldn't break
existing functionality of importing people and companies in the app.\
To test messaging sync you should follow the below steps:\
1. you need to connect a google account to see the importing
functionality. For this purpose you
have to create a project inside Google Cloud. But to make things easier
you can use the below credentials of an already created project. Put
them in .env of twenty-server package:
```properties
MESSAGING_PROVIDER_GMAIL_ENABLED=true
CALENDAR_PROVIDER_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID=951231465939-h61tg6nkpkv1821qi899fjbj9looquto.apps.googleusercontent.com
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET=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
AUTH_GOOGLE_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google/redirect
AUTH_GOOGLE_APIS_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google-apis/get-access-token
MESSAGE_QUEUE_TYPE=bull-mq
```
Alternative env
```properties
MESSAGING_PROVIDER_GMAIL_ENABLED=true
CALENDAR_PROVIDER_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_ENABLED=true
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID=622006708006-dc4n3vrtf3cs2h6k7hgbborudme7ku9l.apps.googleusercontent.com
AUTH_GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET=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
AUTH_GOOGLE_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google/redirect
AUTH_GOOGLE_APIS_CALLBACK_URL=http://localhost:3000/auth/google-apis/get-access-token
MESSAGE_QUEUE_TYPE=bull-mq
```
1. Launch your worker with `npx nx run twenty-server:worker`
2. npx nx run twenty-server:command cron:messaging:messages-import
3. npx nx run twenty-server:command cron:messaging:message-list-fetch
4. npx nx run twenty-server:command
cron📆calendar-event-list-fetch
5. Run the app and navigate to Settings/Accounts then connect your
Google account
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
In this PR, we are refactoring two things:
- leverage field.defaultValue for Select and MultiSelect settings form
(instead of option.isDefault)
- use quoted string (ex: "'USD'") for string default values to embrace
backend format
---------
Co-authored-by: Thaïs Guigon <guigon.thais@gmail.com>
Closes#4295
Note: for the sake of an easier code review, I did not rename/move some
files and added "todo" comments instead so Github is able to match those
files with their previous version.
This PR fixes several issues:
- enum naming should be: {tableName}_{fieldName}_enum and respecting the
case
- defaultValue format handled in the FE should respect the one in the BE
In my opinion we should refactor the defaultValue:
- we should respect backend format: "'myDefault'" for constant default
and "0" for float, "now" for expressions, "true" for booleans. we can
rename it to defaultValueExpression if it is more clear but we should
not maintain a parallel system
- we should deprecate option: isDefaultValue which is confusing
- we should re-work backend to have a more unified approach between
fields and avoid having if everywhere about select, multiselect, and
currency cases. one unified "computeDefaultValue" function should do the
job
What is still broken:
- currency default Value on creation. I think we should do the refactor
first
- select default value edition.
These cases do not break the schema but are ignored currently
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
When writing to the normalized cache (record), it's crucial to use _refs
for relationships to avoid many problems. Essentially, we only deal with
level 0 and generate all fields to be comfortable with their defaults.
When writing in queries (which should be very rare, the only cases are
prefetch and the case of activities due to the nested query; I've
reduced this to a single file for activities
usePrepareFindManyActivitiesQuery 🙂), it's important to use queryFields
to avoid bugs. I've implemented them on the side of query generation and
record generation.
When doing an updateOne / createOne, etc., it's necessary to distinguish
between optimistic writing (which we actually want to do with _refs) and
the server response without refs. This allows for a clean write in the
optimistic cache without worrying about nesting (as the first point).
To simplify the whole activities part, write to the normalized cache
first. Then, base queries on it in an idempotent manner. This way,
there's no need to worry about the current page or action. The
normalized cache is up-to-date, so I update the queries. Same idea as
for optimisticEffects, actually.
Finally, I've triggered optimisticEffects rather than the manual update
of many queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* feat: wip refactor default-value
* feat: health check to migrate default value
* fix: tests
* fix: refactor defaultValue to make it more clean
* fix: unit tests
* fix: front-end default value
