In this PR, I'm fixing part of the impact of soft deletion on optimistic
rendering.
## Backend Vision
1) Backend endpoints will not return soft deleted records (having
deletedAt set) by default. To get the softDeleted records, we will pass
a { withSoftDelete: true } additional param in the query.
2) Record relations will NEVER contain softDeleted relations
## Backend current state
Right now, we have the following behavior:
- if the query filters do not mention deletedAt, we don't return
softDeletedRecords
- if the query filters mention deletedAt, we take it into consideration.
Meaning that if we want to have the softDeleted records in any way we
need to do { or: [ deletedAt: NULL, deletedAt: NOT_NULL] }
## Optimistic rendering strategy
1) useDestroyOne/Many is triggering destroyOptimisticEffects (previously
deleteOptimisticEffects)
2) UseDeleteOne/Many and useRestoreOne/Many are actually triggering
updateOptimisticEffects (as they only update deletedAt field) AND we
need updateOptimisticEffects to take into account deletedAt (future
withSoftDelete: true) filter.
Closes#7336
Create 3 states:
- `contextStoreCurrentObjectMetadataIdState`: is set when we change
object metadata
- `contextStoreCurrentViewIdState`: is set when we change view
- `contextStoreTargetedRecordIdsState`: is set when we select records
inside a table or a board or when a show page is opened. Is reset when
we change view.
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
- Fix duplicate view field creation
- Fix redirect to proper settings data model page
- Refetch view fields after field creation (temporary solution)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5598
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
We used to not type properly the return of getRecordFromCache before the
work from last week.
The getViewFromCache function was patching this temporarily in a "dirty"
way.
Now that this is cleaner, I'm removing the typescript patch. This fixing
several behaviors on viewBar
Split from https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/4518
Related to #4766
Mutualizes eslint config between projects.
I didn't include `twenty-server` in this PR as this was causing too many
lint errors.
When writing to the normalized cache (record), it's crucial to use _refs
for relationships to avoid many problems. Essentially, we only deal with
level 0 and generate all fields to be comfortable with their defaults.
When writing in queries (which should be very rare, the only cases are
prefetch and the case of activities due to the nested query; I've
reduced this to a single file for activities
usePrepareFindManyActivitiesQuery 🙂), it's important to use queryFields
to avoid bugs. I've implemented them on the side of query generation and
record generation.
When doing an updateOne / createOne, etc., it's necessary to distinguish
between optimistic writing (which we actually want to do with _refs) and
the server response without refs. This allows for a clean write in the
optimistic cache without worrying about nesting (as the first point).
To simplify the whole activities part, write to the normalized cache
first. Then, base queries on it in an idempotent manner. This way,
there's no need to worry about the current page or action. The
normalized cache is up-to-date, so I update the queries. Same idea as
for optimisticEffects, actually.
Finally, I've triggered optimisticEffects rather than the manual update
of many queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* Store compact view status
* Rename to isCompact
* Fixes
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
* feat: add link to relation filtered table in Record Show Page
Closes#3125
* refactor: use generateFindManyRecordsQuery for optimization
* Fixes from review
* Minor fixes
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* Use new ObjectRecordConnection
* Use new records without connection in GraphQLView
* Added playwright for storybook tests
* Fixed lint
* Fixed test and tsc
* Fixed storybook tests
* wip tests
* Added useMapConnectionToRecords unit test
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
