# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#5924.
Adding the "many" side of relations in the table view, and fixing some
issues (glitch in Multi record select, cache update after update).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- make invitation and reset password available on every page
- add a sleep after setKeyPair as tokens are sometimes not updated when
redirecting to Index
- refactor sleep
In this PR, we implement the display and update of fields from
fromManyObjects (e.g update Employees for a Company).
Product requirement
- update should be triggered at each box check/uncheck, not at lose of
focus
Left to do in upcoming PRs
- add the column in the table views (e.g. column "Employees" on
"Companies" table view)
- add "Add new" possibility when there is no records (as is currently
exists for "one" side of relations:)
<img width="374" alt="Capture d’écran 2024-06-10 à 17 38 02"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/51697796/6f0cc494-e44f-4620-a762-d7b438951eec">
- update cache after an update affecting other records (e.g "Listings"
have one "Person"; if listing A belonged to Person A but then we
attribute listing A to Person B, Person A is no longer owner of Listing
A. For the moment that would not be reflected immediatly leading, to
potential false information if information is accessed from cache)
- try to get rid of the glitch - we also have it on the task page
example. (probably) due to the fact that we are using a recoil state to
read, update then re-read
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/51697796/54f71674-237a-4946-866e-b8d96353c458
This PR introduces a new side panel to edit records and the ability to
minimize the side panel.
The goal is leverage this sidepanel to be able to create records while
being in another show page.
I'm opening the PR for feedback since it involved refactoring and
therefore already touches a lot of files, even though it was quick to
implement.
<img width="1503" alt="Screenshot 2024-05-23 at 17 41 37"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/6399865/6f17e7a8-f4e9-4eb4-b392-c756db7198ac">
For remotes, we will only create the foreign key, without the relation
metadata. Expected behavior will be:
- possible to create an activity. But the remote object will not be
displayed in the relations of the activity
- the remote objects should not be available in the search for relations
Also switched the number settings to an enum, since we now have to
handle `BigInt` case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
New strategy:
- add settings field on FieldMetadata. Contains a boolean isIdField and
for numbers, a precision
- if idField, the graphql scalar returned will be a GraphQL id. This
will allow the app to work even for ids that are not uuid
- remove globals dateScalar and numberScalar modes. These were not used
- set limit as Integer
- check manually in query runner mutations that we send a valid id
Todo left:
- remove WorkspaceBuildSchemaOptions since this is not used anymore.
Will do in another PR
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
# This PR
- Moves dev and ci scripts to the `project.json` file in the
twenty-front package
- Adds a project.json file in the root of the project with the main
start command that start both twenty-server and twenty-front
applications concurrently
- Updates the script command of the root project with the start:prod
command (replacing the start command which will be used in dev with the
help of nx)
- Add a start:prod command in the twenty-front app, replacing the start
command (now used for dev purpose)
Issue ref #4645
@charlesBochet @FelixMalfait please let me know how can I improve it
---------
Co-authored-by: Thaïs Guigon <guigon.thais@gmail.com>
Split from https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/4518
Related to #4766
Mutualizes eslint config between projects.
I didn't include `twenty-server` in this PR as this was causing too many
lint errors.
When writing to the normalized cache (record), it's crucial to use _refs
for relationships to avoid many problems. Essentially, we only deal with
level 0 and generate all fields to be comfortable with their defaults.
When writing in queries (which should be very rare, the only cases are
prefetch and the case of activities due to the nested query; I've
reduced this to a single file for activities
usePrepareFindManyActivitiesQuery 🙂), it's important to use queryFields
to avoid bugs. I've implemented them on the side of query generation and
record generation.
When doing an updateOne / createOne, etc., it's necessary to distinguish
between optimistic writing (which we actually want to do with _refs) and
the server response without refs. This allows for a clean write in the
optimistic cache without worrying about nesting (as the first point).
To simplify the whole activities part, write to the normalized cache
first. Then, base queries on it in an idempotent manner. This way,
there's no need to worry about the current page or action. The
normalized cache is up-to-date, so I update the queries. Same idea as
for optimisticEffects, actually.
Finally, I've triggered optimisticEffects rather than the manual update
of many queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Created addRecordInCache to inject a record in Apollo cache and inject single read query on this record
- Created createOneRecordInCache and createManyRecordsInCache that uses this addRecordInCache
- Created useOpenCreateActivityDrawerV2 hook to create an activity in cache and inject it into all other relevant requests in the app before opening activity drawer
- Refactored DEFAULT_SEARCH_REQUEST_LIMIT constant and hardcoded arbitrary request limits
- Added Apollo dev logs to see errors in the console when manipulating cache
* refactor: apply relation optimistic effects on record update
Related to #3509
* refactor: remove need to pass relation id field to create and update mutations
* fix: fix tests
* fix: fix SingleEntitySelect glitch
* fix: fix usePersistField tests
* fix: fix wrong import after rebase
* fix: fix several tests
* fix: fix test types
* perf: apply record optimistic effects with cache.modify on mutation
Closes#3509
* refactor: return early when created records do not match filter
* fix: fix id generation on record creation
* fix: comment filtering behavior on record creation
* Fixed typing error
* refactor: review - use ??
* refactor: review - add variables in readFieldValueToSort
* docs: review - add comments for variables.first in triggerUpdateRecordOptimisticEffect
* refactor: review - add intermediary variable for 'not' filter in useMultiObjectSearchMatchesSearchFilterAndToSelectQuery
* refactor: review - add filter utils
* fix: fix tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
