Issue Reference: Fixes#7105
Description:
This pull request introduces adjustments to the styling of the
RecordBoardColumnHeader component. The modifications enhance the layout
and visual consistency of the Kanban board headers.
Changes Made:
Margin Adjustment:
Increased the bottom margin from theme.spacing(2) to theme.spacing(6)
for better spacing below the header.
Header Container Enhancements:
Added a background color sourced from the theme
(theme.background.primary) to the header container for improved
visibility and aesthetics.
Set a fixed height of 40px for the header to ensure a consistent size
across different screens.
Applied a fixed position to the header container to keep it visible at
the top during scrolling.
Added padding at the top using theme.spacing(2) for better alignment of
content within the header.
Before :
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd1c2d65-5e50-489a-a388-c0c4e1bd015b
Now :
[now.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd4cfb86-fc14-4902-b84c-99d27b07859e)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Fixed CSS for SortOrFilter chips
- Fixed bug when refreshing with an actor source filter set
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR, I'm fixing part of the impact of soft deletion on optimistic
rendering.
## Backend Vision
1) Backend endpoints will not return soft deleted records (having
deletedAt set) by default. To get the softDeleted records, we will pass
a { withSoftDelete: true } additional param in the query.
2) Record relations will NEVER contain softDeleted relations
## Backend current state
Right now, we have the following behavior:
- if the query filters do not mention deletedAt, we don't return
softDeletedRecords
- if the query filters mention deletedAt, we take it into consideration.
Meaning that if we want to have the softDeleted records in any way we
need to do { or: [ deletedAt: NULL, deletedAt: NOT_NULL] }
## Optimistic rendering strategy
1) useDestroyOne/Many is triggering destroyOptimisticEffects (previously
deleteOptimisticEffects)
2) UseDeleteOne/Many and useRestoreOne/Many are actually triggering
updateOptimisticEffects (as they only update deletedAt field) AND we
need updateOptimisticEffects to take into account deletedAt (future
withSoftDelete: true) filter.
Closes#7336
Create 3 states:
- `contextStoreCurrentObjectMetadataIdState`: is set when we change
object metadata
- `contextStoreCurrentViewIdState`: is set when we change view
- `contextStoreTargetedRecordIdsState`: is set when we select records
inside a table or a board or when a show page is opened. Is reset when
we change view.
## Context
We have recently merged a refactoring of our view module. However, one
case was forgotten which is to test our dynamic filtering logic.
It is currently possible to pass unsaved filters through the URL and
these filters will be applied to the currentView through
`QueryParamsFiltersEffect`. This component was saving filters but also
listening to them through useGetCurrentView hook.
## How
1) I'm removing this infinite loop by directly loading currentViewId
through the right recoil atom.
Bonus: I'm also removing the unmounting logic which seems wrong to me as
unsaved filters are mounted on a specific view, there is no need to
remove them while switching views in my opinion.
Solves issue #5917.
This PR is now ready for the first review!
Filters do not fully work yet, there's a problem applying multiple
filters like the following:
```
{
and: [
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
gte: start.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
lte: end.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
],
}
```
I'll do my best to dig into it tonight!
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
Fixes#6833
The view states for unsaved changes were not reseted on view change.
The fix was to just add a call to the existing resetCurrentView when the
viewId changes in the related effect.
Implement soft delete on standards and custom objects.
This is a temporary solution, when we drop `pg_graphql` we should rely
on the `softDelete` functions of TypeORM.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
## Context
- Adding RATING sort and filter capabilities.
- Fixing isEmpty/isNotEmpty filters
- Fixing combined view filters so it combines filters per field metadata
and not per filter id. This is more a product question but to me it does
not make sense to apply multiples filters on the same field IF the
operations is wrapped in a AND. If at some point we want to put a OR
instead then that would make more sense
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9fcdd5ca-4329-467c-ada8-4dd5d45be259">
Open questions:
- the Tag component does not match Figma in term of style and API for
"transparent" | "outline". We need to discuss with @Bonapara what is the
desired behavior here
- right now opportunity.stage is not nullable. We need to discuss with
@FelixMalfait and @Bonapara what we want here. I would advocate to make
a it nullable for now until we introduce settings on select fields.
custom select are nullable and it could be confusing for the user
Follow up:
- enhance tests on Tags
- add story to cover the No Value column on record board
# This PR
- Revise my previous work (PR #5969)
Because it would break the current logic and cause unexpected behavior.
(Issue #5979)
- Solve (Issue #5915) with another way
@lucasbordeau What do you think about my current approach?
@JarWarren Please check it out—I'd love to get your feedback too!
---------
Co-authored-by: Achsan <achsanh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#5915
This issue occurs only when there is no select field.
The user then creates a new one in settings and returns back to the view
picker.
And the bug arises, it because `viewPickerKanbanFieldMetadataId` is not
being set correctly.
When a user navigate to settings, the dirty state should be set to
false. As a result, after re-rendering the view picker component, it
triggers the effect to set `viewPickerKanbanFieldMetadataId`
---------
Co-authored-by: Achsan <achsanh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
- Fix duplicate view field creation
- Fix redirect to proper settings data model page
- Refetch view fields after field creation (temporary solution)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5598
**Changes:**
- Changed -/+ to eye and eye off icons
- Changed menu width to 200px
- Created separate menu for hidden fields
- Added Edit Fields option to hidden fields menu
- Added test file MenuItemSelectTag (wasn't included in the issue)
As this is my first pr, feedback is very welcome!
**Note:**
These changes cover most of #4363 . I left out the implementation of the
RightIcon in the "Hidden Fields" menu item.
---------
Co-authored-by: kiridarivaki <k.darivaki03@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Some parts of the Frontend used theme constants exported from
`modules/ui` while other parts used theme constants exported from
`twenty-ui`.
This PR centralizes theme constants by removing them from `modules/ui`
completely.
Stripe tables do not support `hasNextPage` and `totalCount`. This may be
because of stripe wrapper do not properly support `COUNT` request.
Waiting on pg_graphql answer
[here](https://github.com/supabase/pg_graphql/issues/519).
This PR:
- removes `totalCount` and `hasNextPage` form queries for remote
objects. Even if it works for postgres, this may really be inefficient
- adapt the `fetchMore` functions so it works despite `hasNextPage`
missing
- remove `totalCount` display for remotes
- fix `orderBy`
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
The whole viewBar component was re-rendered on view changes which was
introducing performance issue. The need was to compute page title, this
should be done in a lower level component
## Query depth deprecation
I'm deprecating depth parameter in our graphql query / cache tooling.
They were obsolete since we introduce the possibility to provide
RecordGqlFields
## Refactor combinedFindManyRecordHook
The hook can now take an array of operationSignatures
## Fix tasks issues
Fix optimistic rendering issue. Note that we still haven't handle
optimisticEffect on creation properly
## Context
For users with many records, only the first n*60 records were loaded on
board views (n being the number of visible columns). This was because of
the following behavior:
- watch for end of column visibility changes. If an end of column is
visible, try to fetch more. However, watching for visbility changes is
not reliable enough.
## What we want
If an end of column is visible, try to fetch more. If no more records is
availble in pagination, do not fetch more
