This PR was first here to fix the issue related to ticket #5004, after
some testing it seems that changing the name of a relation is actually
properly working, if we rename `ONE-TO-MANY` side, the only things that
is going to be updated is the FieldMetadata as the `joinColumn` is
stored on the opposite object.
For `MANY-TO-ONE` relations, the `joinColumn` migration is properly
generated. We need to take care that if we rename a side of a relation,
sometimes the opposite side doesn't have `inverseSideFieldKey`
implemented and used by default the name of the opposite object, so this
is going to throw an error as the field can't be found in the object.
---------
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
5b26452649