9ed6edc005
- In this PR the default value of IS_CONFIG_VARIABLES_IN_DB_ENABLED has
been changed to true,
- This is my first time writing integration tests, so I’d appreciate a
thorough review. :)
I’ve tried to follow the existing test patterns closely, but there might
be some small mistakes I may have missed.
Also let me know if I have missed any important test cases that should
be tested
UPDATE -
### Config Value Converter Refactoring
- Created a centralized type transformers registry with bidirectional
validation
- Refactored ConfigValueConverterService to support validation in both
directions:
- Maintained existing DB-to-app conversion behavior
- Added validation for app-to-DB conversion
- Added integration tests to verify validation works in both directions
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
19 lines
729 B
TypeScript
19 lines
729 B
TypeScript
import { getConfigVariablesGroupedQueryFactory } from './get-config-variables-grouped.query-factory.util';
|
|
import { makeAdminPanelAPIRequest } from './make-admin-panel-api-request.util';
|
|
|
|
export const getConfigVariablesGrouped = async (expectToFail = false) => {
|
|
const graphqlOperation = getConfigVariablesGroupedQueryFactory();
|
|
|
|
const response = await makeAdminPanelAPIRequest(graphqlOperation);
|
|
|
|
if (!expectToFail) {
|
|
expect(response.body.data).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(response.body.errors).toBeUndefined();
|
|
expect(response.body.data.getConfigVariablesGrouped).toBeDefined();
|
|
} else {
|
|
expect(response.body.errors).toBeDefined();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return { data: response.body.data, errors: response.body.errors };
|
|
};
|