This PR adapts teh deleteOneField to make sure morph relations can be
deleted, either
- from a relation type,
- or from a morph relation type (which is the most obvious case).
This PR covers
- the deletion of fieldMetadata
- and the migrationof workspace schemas, by using the already existing
definition of relation migrations
This PR implements a new test suite: "Delete Object metadata with morph
relation" and completes the other test suites for FieldMetadata and
ObjectMetadata creation/deletion.
Last, we added a nitpick from @paul I forgot on a previous PR on
process-nested-realtion-v2
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1197
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
In this PR, behind a feature flag, we add a permission layer check based
on the read permission.
It is done by computing a map of an object's fields, where keys are the
column names and values the fieldMetadata id, making them comparable to
the restricted fields ids list stored in the permission cache.
For mutations (create, update, delete, destroy), we need to check the
read permission on the returned field, as they may differ from the
updated field. The write field permission will be tackled in a different
PR.
# Introduction
Following `FieldMetadataInterface` deprecation in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13264
As for the previous PR will rename and remove all the file in a
secondary PR to avoid conflicts and over loading this one
## Improvements
Removed optional properties from the `objectMetadataEntity` model and
added utils to retrieve test data
## Notes
By touching to `ObjectMetadataDTO` I would have expected a twenty-front
codegenerated types mutation, but it does not seem to be granular enough
to null/undefined coercion
# Introduction
From the moment replaced the FieldMetadataInterface definition to:
```ts
import { FieldMetadataType } from 'twenty-shared/types';
import { FieldMetadataEntity } from 'src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/field-metadata.entity';
export type FieldMetadataInterface<
T extends FieldMetadataType = FieldMetadataType,
> = FieldMetadataEntity<T>;
```
After this PR merge will create a new one removing the type and
replacing it to `FieldMetadataEntity`.
Did not renamed it here to avoid conflicts on naming + type issues fixs
within the same PR
## Field metadata entity RELATION or MORPH
Relations fields cannot be null for those field metadata entity instance
anymore, but are never for the others see
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/types/field-metadata-entity-test.type.ts`
( introduced TypeScript tests )
## Concerns
- TS_VECTOR is the most at risk with the `generatedType` and
`asExpression` removal from interface
## What's next
- `FielMetadataInterface` removal and rename ( see introduction )
- Depcrecating `ObjectMetadataInterface`
- Refactor `FieldMetadataEntity` optional fiels to be nullable only
- TO DIG `never` occurences on settings, defaultValue etc
- Some interfaces will be replaced by the `FlatFieldMetadata` when
deprecating the current sync and comparators tools
Fixes: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13110
I'm deprecating note.body and task.body to remove confusion between body
and bodyV2
What will be left but should be done later to avoid breaking changes:
- re-add a body field in the graphql API only that points to the same
bodyV2 field in SQL (need to be handled in fields and filter for note
and task)
- (wait some time)
- remove bodyV2 field
- Added a generic HTTP request tool, allowing agents and workflows to
make HTTP requests to external APIs with configurable method, headers,
and body.
- Decoupled HTTP request workflow nodes from workflow-specific types and
factories, introducing a generic tool interface.
- Updated agent system prompts to include explicit guidance for the HTTP
request tool, including when and how to use it, and how to communicate
limitations.
### Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/129bc445-a277-4a19-95ab-09f890f8f051
## Context
Add an eventEmitter instance to twenty datasources so we can emit DB
events.
Add input and output formatting to twenty orm (formatData, formatResult)
Those 2 elements simplified existing logic when we interact with the
ORM, input will be formatted by the ORM so we can directly use
field-like structure instead of column-like. The output will be
formatted, for builder queries it will be in `result.generatedMaps`
where `result.raw` preserves the previous column-like structure.
Important change: We now have an authContext that we can pass when we
get a repository, this will be used for the different events emitted in
the ORM. We also removed the caching for repositories as it was not
scaling well and not necessary imho
Note: An upcoming PR should handle the onDelete: cascade behavior where
we send DESTROY events in cascade when there is an onDelete: CASCADE on
the FK.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR will create the migration to be run for the morph relations
- We created a dedicated util to generate the column name and refactored
a little the code in order to have less dependencies and a clearer devX
(updated the snapshot that changed because of this)
- Moved the `createMigrationActions` to its own util as well
- Created the `MorphRelationColumnActionFactory` based on the relation
one
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Introduced `EachTesting` pattern for the builder unit tests.
As always any suggestions are more than welcomed !
Still need to:
- [x] implem basic tests for field
- [x] create `get-flat-index-field-metadata.mock.ts`
- [x] Implement basic tests for index and index-fields
- [ ] Implem standard edges cases tests TDD style
## Misc
- was https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13132 closed due to mess
to rebase on main
_(AI generated)_
### Summary
This PR fixes a validation bug in the GraphQL API that prevented
relation fields from being programmatically deactivated. The validation
was incorrectly triggering a "name cannot be changed" error even when
the update payload did not include a name, making it impossible to
disable the field.
Issue #13200
### Problem
- The [updateOneField] mutation failed when trying to set `isActive:
false` on a `RELATION` field.
- The root cause was a validation check in
[FieldMetadataValidationService] that compared the incoming `name` with
the existing one. If the input `name` was `undefined`, the check
`undefined !== existingName` would incorrectly fail.
- This created a catch-22 where a field could not be deleted (because it
had to be deactivated first) and could not be deactivated (due to this
validation error).
### Solution
- The validation logic in [field-metadata-validation.service.ts] has
been updated to only check for a name change if a new name is
**explicitly provided** in the input
(`isDefined(fieldMetadataInput.name)`).
- This change correctly enforces the rule that relation field names
cannot be changed, while allowing other properties like `isActive` to be
updated without issue.
### How to Test
1. Create a custom field of type `RELATION`.
2. Using the GraphQL API, call the [updateOneField] mutation with the
field's ID and the payload `{ "isActive": false }`.
3. Verify that the mutation succeeds and the field is now inactive.
4. Call the [deleteOneField] mutation to delete the field.
5. Verify that the deletion is successful.
### Additional Changes
_to be deleted if not necessary_
- Added a new integration test
[successful-field-metadata-relation-update.integration-spec.ts] to cover
this specific use case and prevent future regressions. The existing test
for failing updates remains untouched and continues to pass.
In the BE we throw custom errors with precise error codes (e.g.
"LABEL_ALREADY_EXISTS") before catching them in filters and rethrowing
BaseGraphQLErrors (standard errors such as NotFoundError, UserInputError
etc.).
In the FE we were grouping sentries based on the error codes but we were
actually grouping by very broad codes such as "NOT_FOUND" or
"BAD_USER_INPUT", extracted from the BaseGraphQLErrors.
To fix that, we update the BaseGraphQLError constructor api to allow to
pass on the CustomError directly and retrieve from it the original code
and store it in existing property `subCode` that we will use in the FE
to send errors to sentry.
This new api also eases usage of `userFriendlyMessage` that is passed on
to the api response and therefore to the FE when CustomError is passed
on directly to the BaseGraphQLError constructor.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12867
Issue:
when you have a variable `toto` which is: `Record<string, MyType>` and
you do toto['xxx'], this will be typed as `MyType` instead of `MyType |
undefined`
Solutions:
- activate `noUncheckedIndexedAccess` check in tsconfig, this is the
preferred solution but will take time to get there (this raises 600+
errors)
- use a Map: cf https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13125/files
- set the type to Partial<Record<string, MyType>>. Drawback is that when
you do Object.values(toto), you'll get `Array<MyType | undefined>`.
Hence why we have to filter these behind
<img width="1512" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0a0bfed-c441-4e53-84c2-2da98ccbcf50"
/>
Large PR, sorry for that. Don't hesitate to reach me to have full
context (env. 500lines for integration and unit tests)
- Add connect logic in Workspace Entity Manager
- Update QueryDeepPartialEntity type to enable dev to use connect
- Add integration test on createOne / createMany
- Add unit test to cover main utils
- Remove feature flag on connect
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1148
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1147
In this PR
- introduction of fieldPermission entity
- addition of upsertFieldPermission in role resolver
- computing of permissions taking fieldPermission into account. In order
to limit what is stored in Redis we only store fields restrictions. For
instance for objectMetadata with id XXX with a restriction on field with
id YYY we store:
`"XXX":{"canRead":true,"canUpdate":false,"canSoftDelete":false,"canDestroy":false,"restrictedFields":{"YYY":{"canRead":false,"canUpdate":null}}}`
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
## Expected behavior
Described behavior regarding: (update | create) x (custom | standard) x
(icon, label, name, isSynced)
**Custom:**
- Field RELATION create: name, label, isSynced, icon should be editable
- Field RELATION update: name should not, icon label, isSynced should
- For other fields, icon, label, name, isSynced should be editable at
field creation | update
To simplify: Field RELATION name should not be editable at update
**Standards**
- Field: create does not makes sense
- Field: name should not, icon label, isSynced should (this will end up
in overrides)
To simplify, no Field RELATION edge case, name should not be editable at
update
**Note:** the FE logic is quite different as the UI is hiding some
details behind the syncWithLabel. See my comments and TODO there
## What I've tested:
(update | create) x (custom | standard) x (icon, label, name, isSynced,
description)
Currently, when a server query or mutation from the front-end fails, the
error message defined server-side is displayed in a snackbar in the
front-end.
These error messages usually contain technical details that don't belong
to the user interface, such as "ObjectMetadataCollection not found" or
"invalid ENUM value for ...".
**BE**
In addition to the original error message that is still needed (for the
request response, debugging, sentry monitoring etc.), we add a
`displayedErrorMessage` that will be used in the snackbars. It's only
relevant to add it for the messages that will reach the FE (ie. not in
jobs or in rest api for instance) and if it can help the user sort out /
fix things (ie. we do add displayedErrorMessage for "Cannot create
multiple draft versions for the same workflow" or "Cannot delete
[field], please update the label identifier field first", but not
"Object metadata does not exist"), even if in practice in the FE users
should not be able to perform an action that will not work (ie should
not be able to save creation of multiple draft versions of the same
workflows).
**FE**
To ease the usage we replaced enqueueSnackBar with enqueueErrorSnackBar
and enqueueSuccessSnackBar with an api that only requires to pass on the
error.
If no displayedErrorMessage is specified then the default error message
is `An error occured.`
Modifying the data-model can sometimes fail in the middle of your
operation, due to the way we handle both metadata update and schema
migration separately, a field can be created while the associated column
creation failed (same for object/table and such). This is also an issue
because WorkspaceMigrations are then stored as FAILED can never really
recovered by themselves so the schema is broken and we can't update the
models anymore.
This PR adds a executeMigrationFromPendingMigrationsWithinTransaction
method where we can (and must) pass a queryRunner executing a
transaction, which should come from the metadata services so that if
anything during metadata update OR schema update fails, it rolls back
everything (this also mean a workspaceMigration should never stay in a
failed state now).
This also fixes some issues with migration not running in the correct
order due to having the same timestamp and having to do some weird logic
to fix that.
This is a first step and fix before working on a much more reliable
solution in the upcoming weeks where we will refactor the way we
interact with the data model.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Previous logic was using the previous step output and filtering items
that were passing filters.
What we actually want is:
- send filters, right operand being always a step output key, left
operand being either a key, either a value
- resolve those filter variables
- apply the filters to decide whether the condition is passed or not
This PR introduces a significant enhancement to the role-based
permission system by extending it to support AI agents, enabling them to
perform database operations based on assigned permissions.
## Key Changes
### 1. Database Schema Migration
- **Table Rename**: `userWorkspaceRole` → `roleTargets` to better
reflect its expanded purpose
- **New Column**: Added `agentId` (UUID, nullable) to support AI agent
role assignments
- **Constraint Updates**:
- Made `userWorkspaceId` nullable to accommodate agent-only role
assignments
- Added check constraint `CHK_role_targets_either_agent_or_user`
ensuring either `agentId` OR `userWorkspaceId` is set (not both)
### 2. Entity & Service Layer Updates
- **RoleTargetsEntity**: Updated with new `agentId` field and constraint
validation
- **AgentRoleService**: New service for managing agent role assignments
with validation
- **AgentService**: Enhanced to include role information when retrieving
agents
- **RoleResolver**: Added GraphQL mutations for `assignRoleToAgent` and
`removeRoleFromAgent`
### 3. AI Agent CRUD Operations
- **Permission-Based Tool Generation**: AI agents now receive database
tools based on their assigned role permissions
- **Dynamic Tool Creation**: The `AgentToolService` generates CRUD tools
(`create_*`, `find_*`, `update_*`, `soft_delete_*`, `destroy_*`) for
each object based on role permissions
- **Granular Permissions**: Supports both global role permissions
(`canReadAllObjectRecords`) and object-specific permissions
(`canReadObjectRecords`)
### 4. Frontend Integration
- **Role Assignment UI**: Added hooks and components for
assigning/removing roles from agents
## Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/41732267-742e-416c-b423-b687c2614c82
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillim <guillim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie <51697796+ijreilly@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Baptiste Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
Co-authored-by: nitin <142569587+ehconitin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Rastoin <45004772+prastoin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <157669812+vickywxng@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vicky Wang <vw92@cornell.edu>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12852
Discovered that:
- `relationCreationPayload` does not seem to be validated through the
input decorators
```ts
// TODO @prastoin implement validation for this with validate nested and dedicated class instance
@IsOptional()
@Field(() => GraphQLJSON, { nullable: true })
relationCreationPayload?: {
targetObjectMetadataId: string;
targetFieldLabel: string;
targetFieldIcon: string;
type: RelationType;
};
```
- Sending an unknown `targetObjectMetadataId` generates an
`internal_server_error` `500` @guillim on the go
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/failing-field-metadata-relation-creation.integration-spec.ts
Field metadata relation creation should fail
✓ relation when targetFieldLabel is empty (109 ms)
✓ relation when targetFieldLabel exceeds maximum length (100 ms)
✓ relation when targetObjectMetadataId is unknown (97 ms)
✓ relation when targetFieldLabel contains only whitespace (103 ms)
✓ relation when targetFieldLabel conflicts with an existing field on target object metadata id (108 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots: 5 passed, 5 total
Time: 2.629 s, estimated 3 s
```
Better catching label input
- there were absolutely no check on label when creating the target field
while doing a relation : we crearted these checks here.
- We keep the label quite open to special char as discussed with Felix.
so mostly checking length of label.
- We check that label does not already exists on the targetted object
- making sure the Target fieldinput label is checked before we create
it. The previous checks are not enough since the label goes through
anoteher merthod before going in the database
- validate-metadata-name-is-camel-case.utils.ts : making sure we can use
this error message for metadata name and for target label
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Let's introduce an object-limited role for Tim, to test and/or spot
incompatibilities with restricted permissions in the future.
Our main user tim@apple.dev is now assigned a role that has all settings
permissions, and all object permissions except for update on Pets (to
test read-only view) and read on Rockets.
Since we still need an admin user for each workspace we are introducing
a new member, Jane, who has the admin role
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Test was flaky because sometimes a calendar event is associated to an
account which the user does not have access to
Removing the snapshot to test the exact response value but the test is
still there (more flexible)
- Fix an issue where custom object were seeded with 2 views, and with
the wrong icon
- ACME becomes YCombinator
- Allow 2 workspaces to have different metadata seeded
- Add many seeds for messages
- Add many seeds for calendar events
- Randomize createdBy for person and companies
---------
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12343
Adding a transform step for any field phone in order to infer country
code and calling code from the number if they're provided
## Edges cases
```ts
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_NUMBER:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_CALLING_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_CALLING_CODE_AND_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_CALLING_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_URL:
```
## Coverage
Note: Will handle REST api integration testing pivot and UPDATE
operation later in the afternoon, critical bug appeared that I prefer
handling before improving this PR coverage, also would be too many
updates
Note2: Haven't fuzzed all of the string inputs, would seem overkill for
such a use case, to be debated
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/phone/create-one-field-metadata-phone.integration-spec.ts (23.609 s)
Phone field metadata tests suite
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field (1397 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with number and other information (930 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international format and other information (893 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international and infer other information from it but not the countryCode as its shared (825 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international and infer other information from it (818 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with empty payload (827 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with number and other information (894 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international format and other information (1024 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international and infer other information from it but not the countryCode as its shared (808 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international and infer other information from it (751 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with empty payload (739 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field without country or calling code at all (776 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid country code (782 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid calling code (858 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting country code and calling code (872 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid phone number format (1489 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number country code (1425 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number calling code (1553 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field without country or calling code at all (814 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid country code (813 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid calling code (742 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting country code and calling code (783 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid phone number format (731 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number country code (947 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number calling code (822 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 25 passed, 25 total
Snapshots: 14 passed, 14 total
Time: 23.627 s
```
Fix inconsistent domain URL formats : removing the last / that was
caused by URL method
Standardize URL formatting to ensure consistent links storage and
retrieval of domain URLs across the application. Will improve the
dedpulicates in the links
Note: there is another temporary issue from google that was solved on
the 13th of june https://groups.google.com/g/adwords-api/c/tRSQMRZrJYM
but we consider this out of this scope
Fixes#12621
- Add seeds for notes/tasks
- Adds account manager to companies
- A companies and phone numbers to people
- Add many more opportunities
TODO: add timeline activities
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor Agent <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/868
We should not allow to grant any writing permission (update, soft
delete, delete) on an object or at role-level without the reading
permission at the same level.
This has been implemented in the front-end at role level, and is yet to
be done at object level (@Weiko)
We need to use twentyORMManager and not twentyORMGlobalManager in rest
api base handler, because we don't want to bypass permissions using
`shouldBypassPermissions` parameter (which we would have to do to use
twentyORMGlobalManager).
ScopedWorkspaceContextFactory was not adapted to rest api requests which
form differs from graphql request.
In this PR
- Determine object record permissions on workflows objects (workflow,
workflowVersion, workflowRun) base on settings permissions @Weiko
- Add Workflow permission guards on workflow resolvers @thomtrp . **Any
method within a resolver that has the SettingsPermission Guard is only
callable by a apiKey or a user that has the permission** (so not by
external parties).
- Add checks bypass in workflow services since 1) for actions gated by
settings permissions, the gate should be done at resolver level, so it
will have been done before the call to the service 2) some service
methods may be called by workflowTriggerController which is callable by
external parties without permissions (ex:
workflowCommonWorkspaceService.getWorkflowVersionOrFail). This is
something we may want to change in the future (still to discuss), by
removing the guard at resolver-level and relying on
shouldBypassPermissionChecks at getRepository and made in a way that we
only bypass for external parties.
- Add checks bypass for actions performed by workflows since they should
not be restricted in our current vision
- Add tests
# Fix cursor-based pagination with lexicographic ordering for composite
fields
## Bug
The existing cursor-based pagination implementation had a bug when
handling composite fields.
When paginating through results sorted by composite fields (like
`fullName` with sub-properties `firstName` and`lastName`), the WHERE
conditions generated for cursor positioning were incorrect, leading to
records being skipped.
The previous implementation was generating wrong WHERE conditions:
For example, when paginating with a cursor like `{ firstName: 'John',
lastName: 'Doe' }`, it would generate:
```sql
WHERE firstName > 'John' AND lastName > 'Doe'
```
This is incorrect because it would miss records like `{ firstName:
'John', lastName: 'Smith' }` which should be included in forward
pagination.
## Fix
Create a new util to use proper lexicographic order when sorting a
composite field.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
