Introduced `updatedAt` column. and fix an existing bug where the field
edition page was crashing because we were trying to compute Date('now')
(param coming from the default value)
## Context
We recently introduced the new twenty ORM and used it in the update
methods in the query runner.
Initially we were using pg_graphql to fetch the record before updating
it allowing us to compare the before and the after and create a diff.
This diff is then used for the timeline activity creation. Now,
twentyORM is doing the fetch and pg_graphql is still doing the update
and their responses are not exactly the same, which means the diff is
not working as intended (e.g date types were always in the diff due to
one being in Date format and the other as a string)
This PR introduces a updatedFields property to the update event which
comes from the input. This is not ideal as this won't work for API users
that send the whole payload but will be sufficient enough for our FE
that only sends modified fields. We then compare only those fields in
the diff.
An ACTIVE workspace is a workspace that has a complete workspaceSchema
and is authorized to be browsed by users.
In this PR, I'm:
- introducing a new activationStatus: PENDING_CREATION (existing ACTIVE
/ INACTIVE)
- removing workspaceService.isWorkspaceActivated (based on
workspaceSchema existence which is not robust and checking
activationStatus.ACTIVE instead)
- removing dynamic activationStatus field on worksapce resolver (we can
use the postgres column directly now that data has been migrated)
- on user sign up creating the workspace in PENDING_CREATION, and on
workspace activation setting it to ACTIVE
- only re-activating a workspace if the current activationStatus is
INACTIVE through billing webhooks (a PENDING_CREATION should stay
PENDING and ACTIVE should stay ACTIVE)
- Add global listener on database event
- Fetch event listener associated
- Trigger associated workflow
Also updated the runner so it expects the input to be in the payload
rather than the trigger
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Implement date formatting per workspace member settings
We'll need another round to maybe initialize all workspaces on the
default settings.
For now the default behavior is to take system settings if nothing is
found in DB.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Closes#6431
- create new field `activationStatus`
- create migration commands
- add logic to update `activationStatus` on workspace activation and on
stripe subscriptionStatus change
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Throw service error from query runner
- Catch in resolver factories
- Map to graphql errors
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR refactors the ORM-Manager to simplify and unify the datasource
creation. I'm deprecating all usages if InjectWorkspaceDatasource and
InjectWorkspaceRepository as we can't be sure they are up-to-date
## Bug Description
We are facing a bug in case recaptcha is enabled.
To reproduce:
- Create your recaptcha: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/about/
- update your server .env with the following variables:
```
CAPTCHA_SECRET_KEY=REPLACE_ME
CAPTCHA_SITE_KEY=REPLACE_ME
CAPTCHA_DRIVER=google-recaptcha
```
- Go to the login page, enter an existing user email and hit 'Reset your
password'.
- Add a console.log in emailPasswordResetLink in auth.resolver.ts to get
the token that would be sent by email if you don't have the mailer setup
- Browse: /reset-password/{passwordToken}
- Update the password:
<img width="1446" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dd5b077f-293e-451a-8630-22d24ac66c42">
- See that the token is invalid
You should see two calls in your developer network tab. A successful one
to update the password and another to log you in. This 2nd call
(Challenge) does not have the captcha token provided. It should be
## Fix
- Refreshing the token on page load
- providing it to the Challenge graphql call
This PR fixes a few bugs on TwentyORM:
- fix many to one relations that were not properly queries
- fix many to one relations that were not properly parsed
- compute datasource (or use from cache) at run-time and do not use
injected one that could be outdated
We still need to refactor it to simplify, I feel the API are too complex
and we have too many cache layers. Also the relation computation part is
very complex and bug prone
